Author: CoinW Research Institute Key points On-chain lending is gradually transforming from an early leverage-centric tool to a fundamental infrastructure for capitalAuthor: CoinW Research Institute Key points On-chain lending is gradually transforming from an early leverage-centric tool to a fundamental infrastructure for capital

The Structure, Risks, and New Cycle of the On-Chain Lending Market

2026/01/28 08:30
4 min read
News Brief
On-chain lending has transformed from a basic leverage mechanism into essential infrastructure driving capital flows across DeFi. Currently, lending protocols command approximately $64.30 billion in TVL—roughly 53.54% of DeFi's $120.20 billion total. Aave dominates with around $32.90 billion, claiming nearly half the lending landscape, while Morpho and emerging competitors steadily capture market share.Credit assets are increasingly central to the on-chain RWA narrative. I believe that as diverse debt instruments migrate on-chain and institutions demand compliant, auditable collateral, RWA lending will fuel substantial expansion. Moreover, improving macroeconomic conditions and regulatory clarity are reducing friction and operational costs.However, significant risks persist. Protocols depend heavily on collateral valuations and market depth, leaving them exposed during volatility. Furthermore, uncollateralized lending and RWA introduce credit default and counterparty hazards. Token incentive over-reliance artificially inflates metrics, and cross-chain infrastructure creates attack vectors. Therefore, protocols must balance security, liquidity, and compliance simultaneously.As tokenized securities and compliant assets like US Treasuries enter blockchain ecosystems, on-chain lending is evolving from crypto-native finance into mainstream infrastructure with robust collateral foundations. Institutional inter-lending on-chain represents a critical growth catalyst. We'll probably witness hybrid interest rate models emerge as markets mature, while regulation may bifurcate ecosystems into compliant, stable tiers and experimental, high-risk zones. Ultimately, on-chain lending is accelerating toward global capital market integration through asset compliance and institutional adoption.

Author: CoinW Research Institute

Key points

On-chain lending is gradually transforming from an early leverage-centric tool to a fundamental infrastructure for capital allocation. On-chain lending has become an important part of the DeFi ecosystem. Currently, the total value of on-chain lending protocols (TVL) is approximately $64.3 billion, accounting for about 53.54% of the total TVL of DeFi.

Aave has become the leading protocol in the on-chain lending sector, with a TVL of approximately $32.9 billion, accounting for about 50% of the total TVL of the lending sector. Meanwhile, Morpho and others continue to consolidate their market share, resulting in a dominant player and several strong contenders in the on-chain lending sector.

Credit assets have become an important part of on-chain RWA. With more types of debt being introduced onto the chain, and institutions' increasing demand for compliant and traceable collateral, RWA lending is expected to become another significant growth engine. Simultaneously, improvements in the macro-monetary environment and regulatory framework are jointly reducing capital flow and compliance costs, creating smoother external conditions for market development.

On-chain lending protocols also face multiple risks. First, they are highly dependent on collateral value and market liquidity, making them susceptible to liquidation due to market fluctuations. Second, the introduction of uncollateralized lending and RWA increases credit default and counterparty risk. Furthermore, over-reliance on token incentives to artificially inflate scale, and the security risks of bridging in cross-chain expansion, all pose significant challenges. Therefore, on-chain lending protocols must balance security, liquidity, and compliance while pursuing growth.

As securities tokenization and compliant assets such as US Treasury bonds gradually move onto the blockchain, on-chain lending is evolving from a crypto-native financing tool into mainstream financial infrastructure, with a more robust collateral base. In this process, inter-institutional on-chain lending is expected to become a significant growth driver. Simultaneously, the coexistence of fixed and floating interest rates will promote the continuous maturation of the on-chain interest rate system. Regulatory and capital logic may also lead to a market differentiation into a structure where a compliant and stable layer coexists with a high-risk, innovative layer. On-chain lending will accelerate its integration into global capital markets through asset compliance and institutional alignment.

Table of contents

I. Overview of the On-Chain Lending Market

  • 1.1. Market Size and Capital Flows
  • 1.2. Macroeconomic and Industry Drivers
  • 1.3. Regulatory Dynamics and Compliance

II. Classification of On-Chain Lending Markets

  • 2.1. Mortgage-backed loan agreement
  • 2.2. Unsecured Loan Agreement
  • 2.3. Modular Lending Agreement
  • 2.4. RWA Combined with Lending

III. Competitive Landscape

  • 3.1. Head-end Protocol Landscape and TVL Changes
  • 3.2. Comparison of Revenue Structure and Profit Model
  • 3.3. User Profile and Asset Structure
  • 3.4. Multi-chain deployment and ecosystem integration

IV. Risk Dilemmas and Challenges

  • 4.1. Liquidity Risk
  • 4.2. Credit Default Risk
  • 4.3. The Illusion of Incentives and Growth
  • 4.4. Cross-chain risks

V. Possible Development Trends

  • 5.1. On-chaining of inter-institutional lending
  • 5.2. On-chaining of securities and their collateral potential
  • 5.3. U.S. Treasury bonds will become the core asset for lending.
  • 5.4. Coexistence of fixed and floating interest rates
  • 5.5. The Two-Tier Structure Differentiation in the Lending Market

VI. Conclusion

References

On-chain lending protocols have become a crucial part of the DeFi ecosystem. From their initial role as leverage tools, they have expanded to encompass diversified capital markets including stablecoins and RWA. On-chain lending protocols not only reliably support liquidity but are also increasingly becoming key centers for pricing funds and allocating capital. Currently, the total value of on-chain lending protocols (TVL) is approximately $64.3 billion, accounting for about 53.54% of the total TVL of DeFi (nearly $120.2 billion). Specifically, Aave alone accounts for about 50% of the lending TVL, approximately $32.9 billion; Morpho and others also hold significant market share.

Furthermore, the diversity of funding sources and asset classes in on-chain lending is increasing, with RWA becoming a new engine for the growth of lending protocols. The on-chain lending market structure faces both growth and challenges. On the one hand, the TVL (Total Value Limit) of lending protocols has gradually recovered, and the overall market trend shows signs of recovery. On the other hand, the market still faces structural challenges, with severe liquidity fragmentation, dispersed funds between protocols and chains, and a lack of efficient liquidity integration mechanisms; traditional stablecoin lending is approaching saturation, while RWA and institutional credit remain insufficient in supply, leading to interest rate divergence and differences in risk appetite. The following report will systematically analyze the operating logic, current development status, and trends of the on-chain lending sector from the perspectives of market overview, market classification, and competitor landscape.

Please see the full report here: https://www.coinw.com/zh_CN/research/on-chain-lending-market-structure-risks-and-the-new-cycle/106

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Taiko and Chainlink to Unleash Reliable Onchain Data for DeFi Ecosystem

Taiko and Chainlink to Unleash Reliable Onchain Data for DeFi Ecosystem

Taiko and Chainlink Data Streams to deliver secure, high-speed onchain data by empowering next-generation DeFi protocols and institutional-grade adoption.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 06:10
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
One Of Frank Sinatra’s Most Famous Albums Is Back In The Spotlight

One Of Frank Sinatra’s Most Famous Albums Is Back In The Spotlight

The post One Of Frank Sinatra’s Most Famous Albums Is Back In The Spotlight appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Frank Sinatra’s The World We Knew returns to the Jazz Albums and Traditional Jazz Albums charts, showing continued demand for his timeless music. Frank Sinatra performs on his TV special Frank Sinatra: A Man and his Music Bettmann Archive These days on the Billboard charts, Frank Sinatra’s music can always be found on the jazz-specific rankings. While the art he created when he was still working was pop at the time, and later classified as traditional pop, there is no such list for the latter format in America, and so his throwback projects and cuts appear on jazz lists instead. It’s on those charts where Sinatra rebounds this week, and one of his popular projects returns not to one, but two tallies at the same time, helping him increase the total amount of real estate he owns at the moment. Frank Sinatra’s The World We Knew Returns Sinatra’s The World We Knew is a top performer again, if only on the jazz lists. That set rebounds to No. 15 on the Traditional Jazz Albums chart and comes in at No. 20 on the all-encompassing Jazz Albums ranking after not appearing on either roster just last frame. The World We Knew’s All-Time Highs The World We Knew returns close to its all-time peak on both of those rosters. Sinatra’s classic has peaked at No. 11 on the Traditional Jazz Albums chart, just missing out on becoming another top 10 for the crooner. The set climbed all the way to No. 15 on the Jazz Albums tally and has now spent just under two months on the rosters. Frank Sinatra’s Album With Classic Hits Sinatra released The World We Knew in the summer of 1967. The title track, which on the album is actually known as “The World We Knew (Over and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:02