MicroStrategy, now known as Strategy, has long been known for its aggressive Bitcoin accumulation strategy and its near-total reluctance to sell. But recently, the company has made a notable shift in MicroStrategy, now known as Strategy, has long been known for its aggressive Bitcoin accumulation strategy and its near-total reluctance to sell. But recently, the company has made a notable shift in

Can Strategy (MicroStrategy) Still Affect the Crypto Market by Buying Bitcoin?

MicroStrategy, now known as Strategy, has long been known for its aggressive Bitcoin accumulation strategy and its near-total reluctance to sell. But recently, the company has made a notable shift in how it manages its massive Bitcoin holdings. Instead of treating BTC purely as a long-term reserve asset, Strategy is beginning to approach it as a tool for optimizing its capital structure and maintaining liquidity.
The question many investors are now asking is: can this new strategy still have the same impact on the market as before?
 
 

Key Takeaways

  • Strategy is shifting from one-way BTC accumulation toward two-way capital management through BTC Monetization.
  • An mNAV below 1x makes the model of issuing shares to buy BTC less efficient.
  • Spot Bitcoin ETFs are becoming a larger source of institutional demand than Strategy.
  • Strategy still holds around 4% of the total BTC supply, but its relative market impact is declining.
  • Investors need to monitor mNAV, ETF flows, and the possibility of Strategy selling BTC.

 

1. Why Did the Crypto Market Care So Much Whenever Strategy Made a Move?

Between 2020 and 2024, whenever Michael Saylor, co-founder and executive chairman of Strategy, hinted at another BTC purchase, the trading community would react almost immediately.
The logic was fairly simple: Strategy raised capital by issuing common stock, preferred shares, or debt, then allocated most of the proceeds to Bitcoin as a reserve asset on its balance sheet. As the company repeatedly became a net buyer on a scale ranging from hundreds of millions to billions of dollars per purchase, the market viewed Strategy as a persistent source of institutional demand capable of absorbing circulating supply and pushing prices higher. By 2026, however, the picture has changed. According to the Q2/2026 financial report and the latest updates:
  • Strategy's BTC holdings peaked at around 846,000 BTC at the end of June.
  • As of August 17, 2026, the figure had fallen to 840,447 BTC after the company launched its BTC Monetization program, meaning it began selling part of its holdings to strengthen its cash reserves and fund preferred stock dividends.
     
 
This marks the first time Strategy's role has shifted from a "one-way buyer" to a "two-way manager," challenging the familiar narrative that the market had relied on for years. CEO Phong Le later reassured investors that the company would resume Bitcoin accumulation toward the end of 2026 once it had completed building its USD reserve.
 

2. What Is Strategy's New Bitcoin Accumulation Strategy?

On June 29, 2026, Strategy announced its Digital Credit Capital Framework, marking a major shift after six years of pursuing its Bitcoin Treasury strategy. If Bitcoin was essentially a one-way asset that was only purchased and accumulated throughout 2020-2025, the new framework officially allows the company to sell part of its BTC under certain conditions.
 
This is not simply about "Strategy being allowed to sell Bitcoin." It represents a broader change in how the company manages its balance sheet.
The framework revolves around four key pillars:
  • Maintain a USD Reserve equivalent to at least 12 months of dividend and interest obligations.
  • Increase the STRC dividend yield to 12% per year.
  • Launch two share repurchase programs with a combined value of $2 billion.
  • BTC Monetization Program: Allows the company to sell up to $1.25 billion worth of BTC to strengthen its reserves, meet financial obligations, or repurchase shares.
It is important to note that this is an authorized limit rather than a commitment to sell. BTC sales are considered a last-resort option when other forms of capital raising become less efficient.
Overall, Strategy is moving from a Bitcoin accumulation model toward Bitcoin capital management. When MSTR trades at a favorable valuation, the company can issue shares to acquire more BTC. When the stock trades below the value of its underlying assets, it can prioritize share buybacks and protect liquidity.
This could become a new model for the next generation of Bitcoin Treasury Companies 2.0, while also requiring investors to evaluate Strategy not only by how much BTC it buys, but also by its USD reserves, mNAV, and the potential for BTC selling pressure.
 

3. The "Buy the Rumor, Sell the News" Pattern Has Become Clear

One of the most notable findings comes from research by Bitwise Europe, which analyzed around 100 Strategy BTC purchase announcements since August 2020:
  • For the top 10% of the largest transactions, such as the purchase of more than 34,000 BTC in April, BTC prices tended to rise during the two hours before the announcement was officially released, then reverse lower shortly afterward.
  • In contrast, smaller and medium-sized purchases showed a relatively weak reaction before the announcement but experienced a slight increase after the purchase was confirmed.
In other words, most of the actual buying demand had already been priced in before the company officially announced the purchase. This may be because on-chain transparency allows the market to monitor large wallet movements, or because major trading desks had gained access to the information earlier. By the time the official announcement arrived, there was little surprise left, causing the price reaction to shift toward profit-taking rather than another leg higher.
 
A typical example: In June this year, Strategy announced the purchase of another 1,550 BTC worth around $101 million, but BTC remained almost unchanged around the $62,600 level. This suggests that the market had largely ignored the news. It is fairly convincing evidence that traders have "learned the pattern" and adjusted their strategies around Strategy's announcement events instead of reacting instinctively as they did in previous years.
 

4. Has MSTR's Capital-Raising Flywheel Broken Down?

The machine that allowed Strategy to continuously raise money to buy BTC for years operated through a relatively simple cycle:
Issue more shares to raise capital → use the proceeds to buy Bitcoin → rising BTC prices increase the value of the company's assets → MSTR trades at a higher premium relative to the actual value of its BTC holdings → favorable conditions allow the company to issue more shares at better prices → the cycle repeats.
The problem is that since mid-2025, this premium has narrowed significantly. The key metric MSTR investors watch is mNAV (market-to-net-asset-value), which measures the ratio between the company's market value and the net value of the BTC it holds:
  • Based on pure market capitalization (basic mNAV), the ratio is now only around 0.68-0.70x, meaning MSTR is trading roughly 30% below the implied BTC value per share.
  • Based on enterprise value, including debt and outstanding preferred shares, mNAV rises to around 1.04-1.06x, close to the breakeven point.
The gap between these two figures shows that the company's overall capital structure, including its debt obligations, is being valued relatively close to the value of its BTC holdings. However, the common equity portion is trading at a significant discount. With the stock trading around $93, MSTR has fallen approximately 74% over the past 12 months and nearly 80% from its summer 2025 peak.
With basic mNAV below 1, issuing new shares to purchase BTC becomes unfavorable because it dilutes existing shareholders instead of creating additional value as it did previously. This is precisely why Strategy launched its BTC Monetization program. By the end of July 2026, the company had sold approximately $218 million worth of Bitcoin, reducing its holdings from around 846,000 BTC to 840,447 BTC. At the same time, the company also used part of the capital it raised to repurchase STRC preferred shares trading at a discount to par value, rather than allocating everything toward additional BTC purchases as it had done previously.
Some analysts have previously warned about the "two-way flow risk": a company once viewed as one of the largest sources of Bitcoin demand in the market could now potentially become a source of supply if financial pressure or dividend obligations force it to sell more BTC.
 

5. ETF Flows Have Surpassed Strategy in Terms of Market Impact

Another factor gradually diminishing Strategy's influence is the rise of spot Bitcoin ETFs.
Even during Strategy's most aggressive buying period this year, when the company deployed as much as $2.54 billion in a single week to purchase more than 34,000 BTC, net inflows into spot Bitcoin ETFs during the same period also reached around $200-300 million per day, amounting to billions of dollars per week when accumulated.
 
 
Recent developments make this even clearer:
  • August 3-7: Spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded more than $750 million in net inflows, with BlackRock, Fidelity, and Franklin Templeton all adding exposure.
  • August 14: The market saw a modest net outflow of around $57.6 million.
  • Week ending August 15: Combined Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF flows recorded $1.1 billion in net inflows, ending the outflow streak that had continued since the beginning of the year. BlackRock's IBIT accounted for around 80% of total inflows.
  • Total net assets held by spot Bitcoin ETFs currently stand at around $76.6 billion, with cumulative net inflows of approximately $51.8 billion since these funds began trading in January 2024.
At this scale, just a few days of significant ETF flow changes can create an impact equivalent to or even greater than Strategy's monthly purchases. The market now has multiple institutional channels for gaining Bitcoin exposure, meaning Strategy no longer holds the position of the "only major buyer" that it once had.
Sentiment in the derivatives market also reflects this growing "immunity":
  • The Fear and Greed Index currently sits around 38/100, indicating mild fear rather than euphoria.
  • Bitcoin futures open interest is hovering around 750,000 BTC, equivalent to approximately $48 billion in notional value.
Relatively thin derivatives liquidity compared with the size of open positions means sharp volatility can still occur. However, overall, the market is increasingly treating Strategy's purchases as a normal event rather than a special catalyst that requires an immediate repricing of risk.
 

6. Does the Supply Squeeze Effect Still Exist?

There is no denying that long-term Bitcoin accumulation by a company as prominent as Strategy has a certain impact on circulating supply. The share of BTC held by corporations has increased from around 1% to more than 4% over the past two years, while Strategy alone currently controls around 4% of the total Bitcoin supply with 840,447 BTC, worth approximately $54 billion at current market prices.
In theory, having this amount of BTC locked up for the long term reduces the amount of available supply for other investors.
However, this supply squeeze effect is being offset by several countervailing forces:
  • Bitcoin miners continue to produce around 450 BTC per day, creating natural selling pressure worth tens of billions of dollars each year.
  • Arbitrage activity between ETFs and the spot market also increases the amount of BTC effectively circulating through the market.
  • The number of active Bitcoin addresses currently fluctuates around 667,000, showing that the network remains healthy but has yet to see signs of explosive new demand.
A more accurate way to understand this may be that sustained accumulation can push the price level required to attract sufficient sellers higher over time. However, this is a process that unfolds over weeks or even months, rather than an immediate consequence of a single purchase announcement.
 

7. How Should Investors Evaluate Strategy News?

Instead of immediately buying whenever Michael Saylor posts a signal such as "Bitcoin Drive Engaged," traders should cross-check five factors:
  • The size of the transaction relative to available spot market liquidity.
  • The time gap between the actual purchase and the official announcement.
  • The source of funding for the transaction, whether through equity issuance, debt, or cash.
  • Funding rates and open interest across the derivatives market.
  • The broader macro environment, including ETF flows, interest rate expectations, and overall risk sentiment.
A practical approach is to monitor two sets of data simultaneously:
  • BTC/USDT spot market: trading volume, order book depth, and nearby resistance levels to assess the sustainability of a price move.
  • Perpetual futures: compare the derivatives market to determine whether the rally is being driven by genuine demand or simply by leveraged positions.
     
 
Rising spot demand combined with moderate funding rates generally reflects broader and more sustainable participation. Meanwhile, a sharp increase in open interest accompanied by highly positive funding can create the risk of widespread long liquidations if the price reverses.
 

Conclusion

Strategy's Bitcoin purchases are no longer a "nuclear catalyst" capable of shaping the entire price trend on their own as they could during the 2020-2024 period. Instead, they are gradually becoming a normal institutional event within the broader 2026 market structure.
That said, Strategy remains an important part of Bitcoin's supply structure, with around 4% of the total supply held for the long term. However, the real drivers of Bitcoin price discovery today are increasingly tied to Federal Reserve interest rate decisions and ETF flows rather than any individual purchase announcement from Michael Saylor.
For traders, the key is not to react to the headline itself, but to cross-check the news against liquidity, derivatives data, and the broader macro environment before making a decision.
 
Disclaimer: This content does not constitute investment, tax, legal, financial, or accounting advice. MEXC Blog provides this information for educational purposes only. Always do your own research, understand the risks, and invest responsibly.
 
市場機遇
4 圖標
4實時價格 (4)
--
----
USD
4 (4) 實時價格圖表

本頁面分享的文章均源自公開平台,僅供參考。該內容不代表 MEXC 的立場或觀點。所有版權歸 Van Dat Phan 所有。如果您認為任何內容侵犯了第三方的權益,請聯絡 service@support.mexc.com 以便及時刪除。 MEXC 不保證任何內容的準確性、完整性或及時性,且不對基於所提供信息而採取的任何行動負責。本內容不構成財務、法律或其他專業建議,亦不應被解釋為 MEXC 的推薦或認可。如需專家見解和深入分析,請造訪 MEXC 學院

學習更多 4 知識

查看更多
AI 代幣最佳交易所:9 大加密平台、4 種 AI 幣,只有 2 家全數涵蓋

AI 代幣最佳交易所:9 大加密平台、4 種 AI 幣,只有 2 家全數涵蓋

在這份涵蓋九大平台的比較中,MEXC 是我們的首選。 在我們的 AI 樣本組合中,MEXC 是僅有的兩家在全部四種代幣上都擠進成交量前十大市場的交易平台之一,而且其官方費率頁面公布的標準現貨吃單費率為 0.0500%。 Gate 的涵蓋度與其並駕齊驅。 其餘七家都做不到。 Key Takeaways 在這份涵蓋九大平台的比較中,MEXC 是我們的首選;2026 年 8 月 24 日,它是僅有的兩家
2026/08/27
RWA 代幣最佳交易所:我們查核了 9 個平台的 5 大 RWA 層級

RWA 代幣最佳交易所:我們查核了 9 個平台的 5 大 RWA 層級

在這份涵蓋 9 個平台的比較中,MEXC 是我們的 RWA 代幣首選。 它是本次比較中唯一一個能讓我們在平台官方頁面上查證全部 5 大 RWA 層級的交易所,從板塊代幣、代幣化股票,一路到實股。 Key Takeaways MEXC 是我們的首選,因為它是本次比較中唯一一個能讓我們在平台官方頁面上查證全部 5 大 RWA 層級的平台。 「RWA 代幣」有三種截然不同的意思,而多數排名頁面都默默地只
2026/08/27
MEXC Alpha Trader 投資研究週報 | "美元貶值交易" 點燃話題,BTC 與 黃金 同步突破——新範式還是短期狂熱?

MEXC Alpha Trader 投資研究週報 | "美元貶值交易" 點燃話題,BTC 與 黃金 同步突破——新範式還是短期狂熱?

2026 年 8 月第 3 週 統計週期:2026 年 8 月 19 日 – 2026 年 8 月 25 日 數據截止:2026 年 8 月 25 日 核心敘事 過去一週,幣種市場出現罕見的單邊上漲。比特幣週初約為 $64,000,先後突破 $65,000、$70,000、$75,000 和 $80,000 四個重要整數關口。截至 8 月 25 日亞洲時段,BTC 最高觸及 $80,908,週漲幅
2026/08/27
查看更多

4 最新動態

查看更多
AI晶片拋售潮在美光財報公布前加深,萬億美元論題遭受考驗

AI晶片拋售潮在美光財報公布前加深,萬億美元論題遭受考驗

週二,美國AI半導體股票大幅回落,投資者對2026年部分表現最強勁的科技股獲利了結。納斯達克綜合指數下跌了2.2%,美光科技在財報公布前下跌了逾13%,輝達則下跌了逾4%。此次拋售不僅僅是單日科技板塊的波動:市場正在測試AI記憶體需求與資料中心支出是否仍能支撐偏高的半導體估值。目前的關鍵問題在於,AI晶片交易究竟只是在擁擠的漲勢後進行重置,還是開始出現估值疲態的跡象。
2026/06/24
從稀缺交易到估值紀律:SpaceX的回調考驗OpenAI的IPO野心

從稀缺交易到估值紀律:SpaceX的回調考驗OpenAI的IPO野心

據報導,OpenAI 傾向將其 IPO 推遲至 2027 年,但更強烈的市場訊號來自 SpaceX。SpaceX 於 6 月 22 日收盤下跌了 16.4%,收於 154.60 美元,較盤中高點 225.64 美元降低了 31.5%,但仍較其 135 美元的 IPO 價格高出 14.5%。這一走勢使 SpaceX 從一個由稀缺性驅動的 IPO 成功案例,轉變為 AI 相關超大型上市週期中首個重大公開市場壓力測試。 OpenAI 的問題不在於需求,而在於估值。路透社引用《紐約時報》的報導指出,OpenAI 正考慮等待至 2027 年,以維持高達 1 兆美元的估值目標,而顧問將此選擇定調為:要麼等待達到該估值,要麼以較低目標提前上市。 預測市場已開始反映這種謹慎態度。Polymarket 的 OpenAI IPO 市場近期顯示,OpenAI 在 2026 年 12 月 31 日前完成 IPO 的機率約為四分之一,這表明交易者不再將近期上市視為明確的基本情境。對於加密貨幣交易者而言,這使得 AI 上市前的曝險從單向的稀缺性交易,轉變為與公開市場基準掛鉤的估值紀律交易。
2026/06/29
Hyperliquid 未平倉合約達 115 億美元:鏈上永續合約是否正擴展至美國股票市場?

Hyperliquid 未平倉合約達 115 億美元:鏈上永續合約是否正擴展至美國股票市場?

Hyperliquid 的未平倉合約已達到約 115 億美元,創下 2026 年新高,其中 HIP-3 市場貢獻了近 40 億美元。與 S&P 500 掛鉤的合約已成為最大的 HIP-3 市場,而追蹤 SK Hynix 和 Micron Technology 的合約則反映了對 AI 和半導體相關曝險的需求日益增長。
2026/07/28
查看更多