The post Banks Navigate Compliance in Digital Asset Custody appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. James Ding Nov 14, 2025 11:38 Banks are integrating digital asset custody with new compliance frameworks, aligning with global standards like NIST CSF and DORA to secure assets effectively. Banks and financial institutions are increasingly incorporating digital assets into their operations, marking a significant shift in the financial landscape. This transition presents new challenges in terms of threat vectors and custody models, necessitating alignment with emerging supervisory standards. Global regulators are establishing frameworks to formalize best practices in digital asset management, although specifics on custody architecture remain underdeveloped, according to Fireblocks. Framework for Digital Asset Custody Fireblocks has introduced a custody technology framework designed to support regulated institutions by aligning their infrastructure with supervisory expectations and operational best practices. This framework focuses on key areas such as risk management, control enforcement, and governance, aiming to provide a secure and scalable model for digital asset custody. The framework is structured around four core domains: compliance-related controls, technical safeguards, transaction processing, and monitoring and resilience. It aligns with global regulatory expectations, including NIST CSF 2.0, offering banks a model to operationalize custody governance effectively. Comparing Traditional and Digital Asset Compliance Regulators are extending traditional control expectations into blockchain environments, adapting them to reflect cryptographic infrastructure and real-time operational risks. Key distinctions between traditional and digital asset compliance frameworks include differences in custody models, governance, and risk controls, as well as technology risk expectations and third-party oversight. These adaptations highlight how banks must redefine risk management strategies to accommodate digital asset activities, positioning compliance as a critical operational component. Core Risk Management Domains As regulatory expectations evolve, institutions must embed controls across custody operations. Compliance-related controls must address traditional regulatory requirements and specific blockchain risks, including transaction monitoring, sanctions screening, and know-your-customer (KYC) processes. Technical… The post Banks Navigate Compliance in Digital Asset Custody appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. James Ding Nov 14, 2025 11:38 Banks are integrating digital asset custody with new compliance frameworks, aligning with global standards like NIST CSF and DORA to secure assets effectively. Banks and financial institutions are increasingly incorporating digital assets into their operations, marking a significant shift in the financial landscape. This transition presents new challenges in terms of threat vectors and custody models, necessitating alignment with emerging supervisory standards. Global regulators are establishing frameworks to formalize best practices in digital asset management, although specifics on custody architecture remain underdeveloped, according to Fireblocks. Framework for Digital Asset Custody Fireblocks has introduced a custody technology framework designed to support regulated institutions by aligning their infrastructure with supervisory expectations and operational best practices. This framework focuses on key areas such as risk management, control enforcement, and governance, aiming to provide a secure and scalable model for digital asset custody. The framework is structured around four core domains: compliance-related controls, technical safeguards, transaction processing, and monitoring and resilience. It aligns with global regulatory expectations, including NIST CSF 2.0, offering banks a model to operationalize custody governance effectively. Comparing Traditional and Digital Asset Compliance Regulators are extending traditional control expectations into blockchain environments, adapting them to reflect cryptographic infrastructure and real-time operational risks. Key distinctions between traditional and digital asset compliance frameworks include differences in custody models, governance, and risk controls, as well as technology risk expectations and third-party oversight. These adaptations highlight how banks must redefine risk management strategies to accommodate digital asset activities, positioning compliance as a critical operational component. Core Risk Management Domains As regulatory expectations evolve, institutions must embed controls across custody operations. Compliance-related controls must address traditional regulatory requirements and specific blockchain risks, including transaction monitoring, sanctions screening, and know-your-customer (KYC) processes. Technical…