The post Will Batman And Superman Be In Marvel MCU In 10 Years? It’s Possible appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. DC Studios successfully rebooted their shared cinematic superhero universe (known as the DCU) this year, kicking off a 10-year initial plan referred to as “Chapter 1: Gods and Monsters.” But just as that plan comes to fruition, could Batman and Superman wind up in Marvel’s MCU? It’s possible. David Corenswet stars in “Superman.” Courtesy Warner Bros. Pictures Batman And Superman Set Things Up Things are going terrific so far for DC Studios. Superman, written and directed by DC Studios co-CEO James Gunn, got the DCU ball rolling with a $615 million blockbuster result this summer. Next year brings Supergirl from director Craig Gillespie and screenwriter Ana Nogueira, plus the Batman tie-in Clayface from director James Watkins and written by Mike Flanagan and Hossein Amini. Forbes‘The Batman’ Is Not In DCU Shared Universe, Says Director Matt ReevesBy Mark Hughes Then, 2027 brings the one-two punch of Gunn’s Superman follow-up Man of Tomorrow and writer director Matt Reeves’ The Batman: Part II with co-writer Mattson Tomlin. Additionally, a Wonder Woman script from scribe Nogueira is in the works and that project is now a big priority. And of course, there’s the ever-present Batman: The Brave and the Bold project in development, amid speculation that the DCU and Reeves’ Batman franchise might just merge, despite recent statements confirming the current plan (at least publicly) is to proceed as if the DCU will have its own separate Batman. With an imminent buyout of parent company Warner Bros. Discovery and studios like Paramount and Netflix preparing bids, there’s question as to how much of the existing DCU plan will survive the ownership changes, especially with regard to Batman’s cinematic future, as I discussed at length this week. So it’s possible that there could be some delays and foot-dragging until the situation becomes clearer, since a… The post Will Batman And Superman Be In Marvel MCU In 10 Years? It’s Possible appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. DC Studios successfully rebooted their shared cinematic superhero universe (known as the DCU) this year, kicking off a 10-year initial plan referred to as “Chapter 1: Gods and Monsters.” But just as that plan comes to fruition, could Batman and Superman wind up in Marvel’s MCU? It’s possible. David Corenswet stars in “Superman.” Courtesy Warner Bros. Pictures Batman And Superman Set Things Up Things are going terrific so far for DC Studios. Superman, written and directed by DC Studios co-CEO James Gunn, got the DCU ball rolling with a $615 million blockbuster result this summer. Next year brings Supergirl from director Craig Gillespie and screenwriter Ana Nogueira, plus the Batman tie-in Clayface from director James Watkins and written by Mike Flanagan and Hossein Amini. Forbes‘The Batman’ Is Not In DCU Shared Universe, Says Director Matt ReevesBy Mark Hughes Then, 2027 brings the one-two punch of Gunn’s Superman follow-up Man of Tomorrow and writer director Matt Reeves’ The Batman: Part II with co-writer Mattson Tomlin. Additionally, a Wonder Woman script from scribe Nogueira is in the works and that project is now a big priority. And of course, there’s the ever-present Batman: The Brave and the Bold project in development, amid speculation that the DCU and Reeves’ Batman franchise might just merge, despite recent statements confirming the current plan (at least publicly) is to proceed as if the DCU will have its own separate Batman. With an imminent buyout of parent company Warner Bros. Discovery and studios like Paramount and Netflix preparing bids, there’s question as to how much of the existing DCU plan will survive the ownership changes, especially with regard to Batman’s cinematic future, as I discussed at length this week. So it’s possible that there could be some delays and foot-dragging until the situation becomes clearer, since a…

Will Batman And Superman Be In Marvel MCU In 10 Years? It’s Possible

2025/09/26 06:27

DC Studios successfully rebooted their shared cinematic superhero universe (known as the DCU) this year, kicking off a 10-year initial plan referred to as “Chapter 1: Gods and Monsters.” But just as that plan comes to fruition, could Batman and Superman wind up in Marvel’s MCU? It’s possible.

David Corenswet stars in “Superman.”

Courtesy Warner Bros. Pictures

Batman And Superman Set Things Up

Things are going terrific so far for DC Studios. Superman, written and directed by DC Studios co-CEO James Gunn, got the DCU ball rolling with a $615 million blockbuster result this summer. Next year brings Supergirl from director Craig Gillespie and screenwriter Ana Nogueira, plus the Batman tie-in Clayface from director James Watkins and written by Mike Flanagan and Hossein Amini.

Forbes‘The Batman’ Is Not In DCU Shared Universe, Says Director Matt Reeves

Then, 2027 brings the one-two punch of Gunn’s Superman follow-up Man of Tomorrow and writer director Matt Reeves’ The Batman: Part II with co-writer Mattson Tomlin.

Additionally, a Wonder Woman script from scribe Nogueira is in the works and that project is now a big priority. And of course, there’s the ever-present Batman: The Brave and the Bold project in development, amid speculation that the DCU and Reeves’ Batman franchise might just merge, despite recent statements confirming the current plan (at least publicly) is to proceed as if the DCU will have its own separate Batman.

With an imminent buyout of parent company Warner Bros. Discovery and studios like Paramount and Netflix preparing bids, there’s question as to how much of the existing DCU plan will survive the ownership changes, especially with regard to Batman’s cinematic future, as I discussed at length this week. So it’s possible that there could be some delays and foot-dragging until the situation becomes clearer, since a blockbuster future for the DCU depends on getting Batman as right as they got Superman.

It’s likely we’ll have a Wonder Woman movie by 2029, and either The Brave and the Bold (the DCU new Batman movie) or The Batman: Part III by 2031. There should also be a few more additional live-action DCU feature film releases in that time, plus the animated Dynamic Duo movie and several streaming series like Peacemaker, Creature Commandos, Lanterns, and others.

So by the early 2030s, we should have between eight to ten DCU movies already, setting up the final leg of “Gods and Monsters” for whatever capstone project (I suspect a Super Friends movie at the moment, but it’s early) sometime between 2032 and 2035, completing the establishment of the foundations of a successful shared DC universe across all mediums, finally at long last giving DC the same scope and success Marvel Studio’s own MCU has enjoyed.

ForbesDC Studios’ Batman Plans May Change In Paramount Or Netflix WBD Buyout

Batman and Superman: Free Agents?

Unfortunately for DC Studios, this grand achievement will come to fruition at exactly the worst time. Because in 2034 and 2035, Superman and Batman (respectively) are scheduled to enter the public domain.

That’s right, in less than 10 years, the earliest incarnation of Superman will be available for use by anyone, essentially. And a year later, in 2035, Batman’s very first iteration will become publicly available for use. This has been discussed for a while, since the countdown has started on the final decade as DC Studios tries to work its magic on the big screen, but most conversation has centered around the notion of Zack Snyder starting his own DC movie universe, fans generating AI versions of their own ideas (and inevitably overstepping by using aspects of the characters not in the public domain, setting off lawsuits galore), or the rush of low-budget exploitation horror movies using the superheroes.

I think the much bigger deal is that Marvel will be able to introduce Superman and Batman into their own comics and movies, and that the timing is just when DC should be riding high with no worries, assuming their own DCU continues to succeed (which I do assume). Instead, Marvel will have had years to plot their own adaptations of those characters and will have a chance to use that for undercutting DC’s own position in the marketplace.

Every year, more and more of each character’s world, villains, and modernized changes will become available, as will other DC superheroes like Blue Beetle, the Spirit, Flash, Hawkman, Wonder Woman, and Green Lantern. Within about half a year after the DCU’s “Chapter One” ends, Marvel will have access to a large set of DC’s most popular superheroes.

On the flip side, the only really notable or “usable in their early forms” Marvel characters who could become available for DC to use in their own stories are the Sub-Mariner, the original Human Torch, Captain America, and Bucky. Those are some good ones, but notice it’s a small list and only includes one truly top-tier MCU hero.

So it will be a one-sided situation where Marvel quickly accumulates access to all of the biggest DC superheroes in a relatively short period of time starting in 2034, at the moment when DC will be trumpeting the victory of their “Chapter 1: Gods and Monsters.”

Barry Keoghan stars in a deleted scene from “The Batman”

Source: Warner Bros.

It’s true that “Gods and Monsters” might wind up concluding a year or two earlier, or a year or two later, but the proximity and overlap makes it a wash. The outcome is that either the end of the DCU’s “Gods and Monsters” or the start of the DCU’s “Chapter 2″ will come when Marvel gets Superman and Batman.

If you’re Marvel, you simply cannot ignore such a convergence of opportunity. Batman is a prime character and brand around the world, Batman will be riding a wave of popularity from the DCU, Batman is suddenly available to put into the MCU films, the use of Batman in the MCU will inherently attract attention for Marvel instead of just DC, and any Marvel use of Batman will inherently be negative for DC.

It’s not that they have animosity toward one another the way the Marvel-DC fandoms do. It’s that in any studio business if a competing studio has a top brand and you can also use that brand to improve your own position but also weaken a competitor’s position, then you do it. Because there are a limited number of total tickets sold each year to a limited number of people, and every movie is competing against every other movie for those ticket sales. After all, the average person only sees three or maybe four films each year, and every movie wants to be chosen.

Forbes‘Superman’ Sequel In The Works? Sort Of, Says James Gunn

Marvel’s Batman And Superman

So yes, as soon as Marvel can make Batman movies, Marvel will surely make Batman movies. If they don’t, then investors should revolt, because this is a no-brainer. The same with Superman, there’s every reason to use him and zero reasons not to. Marvel could literally even start their own separate superhero shared world just for the DC superheroes as they enter public domain, and from 2034 til about 2040 they’d probably have enough of the primary set of DC heroes to fill out a standalone shared universe and do a Justice League movie.

This sounds crazy, except in less than 10 years it starts happening. Marvel would surely know that everybody will want in on that action, but that nobody has the advantages and ability to jump to the head of the pack like Marvel does, with their built-in fanbase and massive outreach and unmatchable merchandising and PR machines at their disposal through their parent company.

DC’s shared-universe struggles have resulted in Warner Bros.’ reputation of being their own worst enemy, because their biggest obstacle is so often themselves. It’s ironic that, when they finally succeed in establishing their cinematic universe, their biggest competition might once again be themselves, with their biggest brands – Batman and Superman.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/markhughes/2025/09/25/will-batman-and-superman-be-in-marvel-mcu-in-10-years-its-possible/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

US Spot ETH ETFs Witness Remarkable $244M Inflow Surge

US Spot ETH ETFs Witness Remarkable $244M Inflow Surge

BitcoinWorld US Spot ETH ETFs Witness Remarkable $244M Inflow Surge The world of digital assets is buzzing with exciting news! US spot ETH ETFs recently experienced a significant milestone, recording a whopping $244 million in net inflows on October 28. This marks the second consecutive day of positive movement for these crucial investment vehicles, signaling a growing appetite for Ethereum exposure among mainstream investors. What’s Fueling the Latest US Spot ETH ETFs Inflow? This impressive influx of capital into US spot ETH ETFs highlights a clear trend: institutional and retail investors are increasingly comfortable with regulated crypto investment products. The figures, reported by industry tracker Trader T, show a robust interest that could reshape the market. Fidelity’s FETH led the charge, attracting a substantial $99.27 million. This demonstrates strong confidence in Fidelity’s offering and Ethereum’s long-term potential. BlackRock’s ETHA wasn’t far behind, securing $74.74 million in inflows. BlackRock’s entry into the crypto ETF space has been closely watched, and these numbers confirm its growing influence. Grayscale’s Mini ETH also saw significant action, pulling in $73.03 million. This new product is quickly gaining traction, offering investors another avenue for Ethereum exposure. It’s important to note that while most products saw positive flows, Grayscale’s ETHE experienced a net outflow of $2.66 million. This might suggest a shift in investor preference towards newer, perhaps more cost-effective, spot ETF options. Why Are US Spot ETH ETFs Attracting Such Significant Capital? The appeal of US spot ETH ETFs is multifaceted. For many investors, these products offer a regulated and accessible way to gain exposure to Ethereum without directly owning the cryptocurrency. This removes some of the complexities associated with digital asset management, such as setting up wallets, managing private keys, or dealing with less regulated exchanges. Key benefits include: Accessibility: Investors can buy and sell shares of the ETF through traditional brokerage accounts, just like stocks. Regulation: Being regulated by financial authorities provides a layer of security and trust that some investors seek. Diversification: For traditional portfolios, adding exposure to a leading altcoin like Ethereum through an ETF can offer diversification benefits. Liquidity: ETFs are generally liquid, allowing for easy entry and exit from positions. Moreover, Ethereum itself continues to be a powerhouse in the blockchain space, underpinning a vast ecosystem of decentralized applications (dApps), NFTs, and decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols. Its ongoing development and significant network activity make it an attractive asset for long-term growth. What Does This US Spot ETH ETFs Trend Mean for Investors? The consistent positive inflows into US spot ETH ETFs could be a strong indicator of maturing institutional interest in the broader crypto market. It suggests that major financial players are not just dabbling but are actively integrating digital assets into their investment strategies. For individual investors, this trend offers several actionable insights: Market Validation: The increasing capital flow validates Ethereum’s position as a significant digital asset with real-world utility and investor demand. Potential for Growth: Continued institutional adoption through ETFs could contribute to greater price stability and potential upward momentum for Ethereum. Observing Investor Behavior: The shift from products like Grayscale’s ETHE to newer spot ETFs highlights how investors are becoming more discerning about their investment vehicles, prioritizing efficiency and cost. However, it is crucial to remember that the crypto market remains volatile. While these inflows are positive, investors should always conduct their own research and consider their risk tolerance before making investment decisions. A Compelling Outlook for US Spot ETH ETFs The recent $244 million net inflow into US spot ETH ETFs is more than just a number; it’s a powerful signal. It underscores a growing confidence in Ethereum as an asset class and the increasing mainstream acceptance of regulated cryptocurrency investment products. With major players like Fidelity and BlackRock leading the charge, the landscape for digital asset investment is evolving rapidly, offering exciting new opportunities for both seasoned and new investors alike. This positive momentum suggests a potentially bright future for Ethereum’s integration into traditional financial portfolios. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) What is a US spot ETH ETF? A US spot ETH ETF (Exchange-Traded Fund) is an investment product that allows investors to gain exposure to the price movements of Ethereum (ETH) without directly owning the cryptocurrency. The fund holds actual Ethereum, and shares of the fund are traded on traditional stock exchanges. Which firms are leading the inflows into US spot ETH ETFs? On October 28, Fidelity’s FETH led with $99.27 million, followed by BlackRock’s ETHA with $74.74 million, and Grayscale’s Mini ETH with $73.03 million. Why are spot ETH ETFs important for the crypto market? Spot ETH ETFs are crucial because they provide a regulated, accessible, and often more familiar investment vehicle for traditional investors to enter the cryptocurrency market. This can lead to increased institutional adoption, greater liquidity, and enhanced legitimacy for Ethereum as an asset class. What was Grayscale’s ETHE outflow and what does it signify? Grayscale’s ETHE experienced a net outflow of $2.66 million. This might indicate that some investors are shifting capital from older, perhaps less efficient, Grayscale products to newer spot ETH ETFs, which often offer better fee structures or direct exposure without the previous trust structure limitations. If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network! Your support helps us bring more valuable insights into the world of cryptocurrency. Spread the word and let others discover the exciting trends shaping the digital asset space. To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum institutional adoption. This post US Spot ETH ETFs Witness Remarkable $244M Inflow Surge first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
2025/10/29 11:45
First Ethereum Treasury Firm Sells ETH For Buybacks: Death Spiral Incoming?

First Ethereum Treasury Firm Sells ETH For Buybacks: Death Spiral Incoming?

Ethereum-focused treasury company ETHZilla said it has sold roughly $40 million worth of ether to fund ongoing share repurchases, a maneuver aimed at closing what it calls a “significant discount to NAV.” In a press statement on Monday, the company disclosed that since Friday, October 24, it has bought back about 600,000 common shares for approximately $12 million under a broader authorization of up to $250 million, and that it intends to continue buying while the discount persists. ETHZilla Dumps ETH For BuyBacks The company framed the buybacks as balance-sheet arbitrage rather than a strategic retreat from its core Ethereum exposure. “We are leveraging the strength of our balance sheet, including reducing our ETH holdings, to execute share repurchases,” chairman and CEO McAndrew Rudisill said, adding that ETH sales are being used as “cash” while common shares trade below net asset value. He argued the transactions would be immediately accretive to remaining shareholders. Related Reading: Crypto Analyst Shows The Possibility Of The Ethereum Price Reaching $16,000 ETHZilla amplified the message on X, saying it would “use its strong balance sheet to support shareholders through buybacks, reduce shares available for short borrow, [and] drive up NAV per share” and reiterating that it still holds “~$400 million of ETH” on the balance sheet and carries “no net debt.” The company also cited “recent, concentrated short selling” as a factor keeping the stock under pressure. The market-structure logic is straightforward: when a digital-asset treasury trades below the value of its coin holdings and cash, buying back stock with “coin-cash” can, in theory, collapse the discount and lift NAV per share. But the optics are contentious inside crypto because the mechanism requires selling the underlying asset—here, ETH—to purchase equity, potentially weakening the very treasury backing that investors originally sought. Death Spiral Incoming? Popular crypto trader SalsaTekila (@SalsaTekila) commented on X: “This is extremely bearish, especially if it invites similar behavior. ETH treasuries are not Saylor; they haven’t shown diamond-hand will. If treasury companies start dumping the coin to buy shares, it’s a death spiral setup.” Skeptics also zeroed in on funding choices. “I am mostly curious why the company chose to sell ETH and not use the $569m in cash they had on the balance sheet last month,” another analyst Dan Smith wrote, noting ETHZilla had just said it still holds about $400 million of ETH and thus didn’t deploy it on fresh ETH accumulation. “Why not just use cash?” The question cuts to the core of treasury signaling: using ETH as a liquidity reservoir to defend a discounted equity can be read as rational capital allocation, or as capitulation that undermines the ETH-as-reserve narrative. Beyond the buyback, a retail-driven storyline has rapidly formed around the stock. Business Insider reported that Dimitri Semenikhin—who recently became the face of the Beyond Meat surge—has targeted ETHZilla, saying he purchased roughly 2% of the company at what he views as a 50% discount to modified NAV. He has argued that the market is misreading ETHZilla’s balance sheet because it still reflects legacy biotech results rather than the current digital-asset treasury model. Related Reading: Ethereum Emerges As The Sole Trillion-Dollar Institutional Store Of Value — Here’s Why The same report cites liquid holdings on the order of 102,300 ETH and roughly $560 million in cash, translating to about $62 per share in liquid assets, and calls out a 1-for-10 reverse split on October 15 that, in his view, muddied the optics for retail. Semenikhin flagged November 13 as a potential catalyst if results show the pivot to ETH generating profits. The company’s own messaging emphasizes the discount-to-NAV lens rather than a change in strategy. ETHZilla told investors it would keep buying while the stock trades below asset value and highlighted a goal of shrinking lendable supply to blunt short-selling pressure. For Ethereum markets, the immediate flow effect is limited—$40 million is marginal in ETH’s daily liquidity—but the second-order risk flagged by traders is behavioral contagion. If other ETH-heavy treasuries follow the playbook, selling the underlying to buy their own stock, the flow could become pro-cyclical: coins are sold to close equity discounts, the selling pressures spot, and wider discounts reappear as equity screens rerate to the weaker mark—repeat. That is the “death spiral” scenario skeptics warn about when the treasury asset doubles as the company’s signal of conviction. At press time, ETH traded at $4,156. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
2025/10/29 12:00