The post Why Kalshi’s $5B valuation puts Polymarket on notice appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A high-stakes capital race has redefined the prediction market. Kalshi’s $300 million raise at a $5 billion valuation positioned it as the most valuable CFTC-regulated event-contract exchange in history. The firm’s expansion into 140 countries and growing list of macro and cultural markets seemed to cement its place as the global leader. Around the same time, Polymarket, Kalshi’s on-chain rival, secured $2 billion in backing from Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the owner of the New York Stock Exchange, and announced plans to re-enter the US market through a newly licensed exchange framework. This marks the first true duel between regulated infrastructure and crypto-native liquidity in the prediction market. Polymarket goes institutional The ICE investment transformed Polymarket overnight from a scrappy decentralized platform into a heavyweight competitor with Wall Street credentials. ICE’s commitment gives the firm an implied valuation of $8 billion and makes it the first blockchain-based prediction market to gain backing from a Tier-1 financial operator. Beyond the capital, the partnership grants Polymarket access to ICE’s global distribution and data-feed infrastructure: channels that reach thousands of institutions already plugged into equities, commodities, and derivatives markets. Polymarket’s comeback also carries a regulatory twist. After years of operating offshore, the company has quietly built a compliant US pathway by acquiring QCX LLC, a CFTC-licensed exchange. Through QCX, Polymarket obtained a Designated Contract Market license and adopted a self-certification mechanism for event markets, allowing it to list new contracts without pre-approval unless the CFTC objects. That structure effectively mirrors Kalshi’s own legal model. A recent no-action letter cleared the way for Polymarket to resume operations in the United States, starting with contracts tied to sports outcomes and election probabilities. In parallel, Polymarket has timed its re-entry to coincide with the surge in political and sports-betting interest ahead of the 2026 election cycle. Its… The post Why Kalshi’s $5B valuation puts Polymarket on notice appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A high-stakes capital race has redefined the prediction market. Kalshi’s $300 million raise at a $5 billion valuation positioned it as the most valuable CFTC-regulated event-contract exchange in history. The firm’s expansion into 140 countries and growing list of macro and cultural markets seemed to cement its place as the global leader. Around the same time, Polymarket, Kalshi’s on-chain rival, secured $2 billion in backing from Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the owner of the New York Stock Exchange, and announced plans to re-enter the US market through a newly licensed exchange framework. This marks the first true duel between regulated infrastructure and crypto-native liquidity in the prediction market. Polymarket goes institutional The ICE investment transformed Polymarket overnight from a scrappy decentralized platform into a heavyweight competitor with Wall Street credentials. ICE’s commitment gives the firm an implied valuation of $8 billion and makes it the first blockchain-based prediction market to gain backing from a Tier-1 financial operator. Beyond the capital, the partnership grants Polymarket access to ICE’s global distribution and data-feed infrastructure: channels that reach thousands of institutions already plugged into equities, commodities, and derivatives markets. Polymarket’s comeback also carries a regulatory twist. After years of operating offshore, the company has quietly built a compliant US pathway by acquiring QCX LLC, a CFTC-licensed exchange. Through QCX, Polymarket obtained a Designated Contract Market license and adopted a self-certification mechanism for event markets, allowing it to list new contracts without pre-approval unless the CFTC objects. That structure effectively mirrors Kalshi’s own legal model. A recent no-action letter cleared the way for Polymarket to resume operations in the United States, starting with contracts tied to sports outcomes and election probabilities. In parallel, Polymarket has timed its re-entry to coincide with the surge in political and sports-betting interest ahead of the 2026 election cycle. Its…

Why Kalshi’s $5B valuation puts Polymarket on notice

2025/10/10 23:54

A high-stakes capital race has redefined the prediction market. Kalshi’s $300 million raise at a $5 billion valuation positioned it as the most valuable CFTC-regulated event-contract exchange in history. The firm’s expansion into 140 countries and growing list of macro and cultural markets seemed to cement its place as the global leader.

Around the same time, Polymarket, Kalshi’s on-chain rival, secured $2 billion in backing from Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the owner of the New York Stock Exchange, and announced plans to re-enter the US market through a newly licensed exchange framework.

This marks the first true duel between regulated infrastructure and crypto-native liquidity in the prediction market.

Polymarket goes institutional

The ICE investment transformed Polymarket overnight from a scrappy decentralized platform into a heavyweight competitor with Wall Street credentials. ICE’s commitment gives the firm an implied valuation of $8 billion and makes it the first blockchain-based prediction market to gain backing from a Tier-1 financial operator. Beyond the capital, the partnership grants Polymarket access to ICE’s global distribution and data-feed infrastructure: channels that reach thousands of institutions already plugged into equities, commodities, and derivatives markets.

Polymarket’s comeback also carries a regulatory twist. After years of operating offshore, the company has quietly built a compliant US pathway by acquiring QCX LLC, a CFTC-licensed exchange. Through QCX, Polymarket obtained a Designated Contract Market license and adopted a self-certification mechanism for event markets, allowing it to list new contracts without pre-approval unless the CFTC objects. That structure effectively mirrors Kalshi’s own legal model. A recent no-action letter cleared the way for Polymarket to resume operations in the United States, starting with contracts tied to sports outcomes and election probabilities.

In parallel, Polymarket has timed its re-entry to coincide with the surge in political and sports-betting interest ahead of the 2026 election cycle. Its first US product slate reportedly includes NFL-style moneyline and point-spread markets and macro-themed contracts on inflation, unemployment, and presidential odds. For Kalshi, which has been building its own regulated sports and entertainment categories, this represents direct overlap in nearly every growth vertical it identified for 2025.

Diverging philosophies

Kalshi’s strategy from day one has been to look and behave like a financial exchange, not a crypto startup. It operates under full CFTC oversight, clears trades in dollars, requires KYC verification, and positions its products as risk-management instruments rather than speculative wagers. The founders, Tarek Mansour and Luana Lopes Lara, often describe their goal as building a “futures exchange for everyday events”: a platform that allows traders to hedge exposure to inflation surprises, policy decisions, or even weather anomalies.

Polymarket’s trajectory could not have been more different. It rose during the DeFi boom as an open, tokenized platform where users could trade on virtually any topic using stablecoins. Its speed and openness made it popular among crypto natives and political bettors, but its regulatory exposure limited its access to mainstream capital. When US regulators fined Polymarket in 2022 and restricted its operations, it appeared to confirm Kalshi’s long-held thesis that compliance was the only path to scale. Yet the ICE partnership has flipped that narrative, demonstrating that a crypto-native model can coexist with regulatory legitimacy once a trusted intermediary bridges the gap.

Now, the contrast between the two platforms is less about legality and more about philosophy. Kalshi remains rooted in traditional market structure, emphasizing transparency and incremental growth. Polymarket has become the experimental frontier: a decentralized core reinforced by institutional scaffolding. The result is a convergence: Kalshi moving slightly toward innovation, and Polymarket edging toward regulation.

A narrowing gap

Kalshi’s compliance advantage once looked unassailable. However, if Polymarket can operate under a similar CFTC framework while leveraging ICE’s technology and data reach, the margin between the two will begin to disappear. Investors and liquidity providers who once preferred Kalshi’s regulatory certainty may now see equal safety with greater upside on Polymarket, especially if ICE integrates prediction-market data into its existing financial terminals.

This development also creates new pressure on Kalshi to accelerate its roadmap. Its international rollout, initially aimed at gradually onboarding retail and institutional users, now faces competition from a rival with a larger valuation and far deeper distribution. Polymarket’s data could soon appear on Bloomberg-style dashboards and risk-management systems, giving it visibility that Kalshi will struggle to match unless it secures similar partnerships.
The road ahead

Both companies now represent opposite poles of the same emerging industry. Kalshi embodies the institutionalization of prediction markets, proving they can exist inside the boundaries of US law. Polymarket, once an outsider, is now building a hybrid model where blockchain liquidity meets regulated infrastructure. Their competition could accelerate the normalization of event-based trading as a legitimate component of financial portfolios, bridging the gap between hedging instruments and public sentiment.

For Kalshi, the challenge is demonstrating that regulation remains a durable moat even when others gain it too. Its best defense may be execution: deeper liquidity, broader product coverage, and continued credibility with regulators wary of crypto experimentation. For Polymarket, the next phase is about proving that institutional capital can flow through decentralized systems without losing trust or transparency.

The race between them will define whether prediction markets evolve into a new class of financial derivatives or remain an experimental niche. Kalshi’s founders have long argued that the world’s most valuable commodity is information about the future. Polymarket’s comeback, backed by the owner of the NYSE, shows that Wall Street may have finally come to the same conclusion.

Mentioned in this article

Source: https://cryptoslate.com/why-kalshis-5b-valuation-puts-polymarket-on-notice/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Shocking Crypto Scam Exposed: Group Referred to Prosecutors Over $4.3M Fraud

Shocking Crypto Scam Exposed: Group Referred to Prosecutors Over $4.3M Fraud

BitcoinWorld Shocking Crypto Scam Exposed: Group Referred to Prosecutors Over $4.3M Fraud The world of cryptocurrency, while offering exciting opportunities, also harbors significant risks. A recent incident in South Korea serves as a stark reminder, where a group accused of orchestrating a massive crypto scam has been referred to prosecutors. This alleged fraud, totaling 5.8 billion won (approximately $4.3 million), highlights the crucial need for vigilance among investors. Unpacking the Deception: How This Crypto Scam Unfolded According to reports from YTN, the accused group allegedly defrauded 27 unsuspecting investors through a series of elaborate tactics. Their scheme was not just about empty promises; it involved sophisticated manipulation designed to exploit trust and greed. Understanding these methods is key to recognizing potential red flags in the future. Price Manipulation: The ring reportedly manipulated the prices of certain digital coins, creating an artificial sense of value and growth. This tactic makes an investment seem more attractive than it truly is. False Exchange Listings: A major part of their deception involved falsely claiming that specific tokens would soon be listed on prominent cryptocurrency exchanges. Such listings typically lead to price surges, making these claims highly enticing to investors. Guaranteed Returns: Luring victims with promises of large, guaranteed returns on coins that the group personally vouched for was another core element. In the volatile crypto market, “guaranteed returns” are often a tell-tale sign of a scam. These methods collectively created a compelling illusion of a lucrative, low-risk investment, ultimately leading to significant financial losses for the victims. Who Were the Victims of This Massive Crypto Scam? The scale of this operation is considerable, impacting 27 individual investors who collectively lost millions. Each victim likely had hopes of financial growth, only to face the harsh reality of fraud. This incident underscores that even experienced individuals can fall prey to well-crafted schemes, especially when promises of quick wealth are involved. It’s a sobering reminder that the allure of rapid profits can sometimes overshadow critical due diligence. The referral of this group to prosecutors marks a significant step towards justice for those affected by this devastating crypto scam. Why Do These Crypto Scams Continue to Thrive? Despite increasing awareness, crypto scams unfortunately persist. Several factors contribute to their prevalence in the digital asset space: Market Volatility and Hype: The inherent volatility of the crypto market, combined with periods of intense hype, creates an environment ripe for exploitation. Investors eager for quick gains can become less cautious. Complexity and Information Asymmetry: Cryptocurrencies can be complex, and not all investors fully understand the underlying technology or market dynamics. Scammers leverage this knowledge gap. Regulatory Gaps: While regulations are evolving, the decentralized nature of crypto often means there are still gaps that fraudsters can exploit, especially across international borders. Anonymity: The pseudo-anonymous nature of some blockchain transactions can make it challenging to trace funds and identify perpetrators, emboldening criminals. Understanding these contributing factors is the first step in building a stronger defense against such fraudulent activities. Protecting Yourself: Actionable Insights Against Crypto Scams In a landscape where sophisticated fraud like this $4.3 million crypto scam can occur, proactive measures are essential. Here are vital steps you can take to safeguard your investments: Do Your Own Research (DYOR): Always thoroughly investigate any project or token before investing. Look for whitepapers, team backgrounds, community sentiment, and genuine utility. Be Skeptical of “Guaranteed Returns”: No legitimate investment, especially in crypto, can promise guaranteed high returns. If it sounds too good to be true, it almost certainly is. Verify Exchange Listings: Always check official exchange announcements directly on their websites, not through third-party claims or unofficial channels. Understand the Risks: Acknowledge that cryptocurrency investments carry inherent risks, and never invest more than you can afford to lose. Seek Independent Advice: If unsure, consult with a trusted financial advisor who understands the crypto market. By adopting a cautious and informed approach, investors can significantly reduce their vulnerability to fraudulent schemes. The Road Ahead: Legal Action and Investor Vigilance The referral of this group to South Korean prosecutors signals a commitment to tackling financial crime in the crypto sector. Legal actions like this are crucial not only for seeking justice for victims but also for deterring future fraudsters. However, legal processes can be lengthy and complex. Ultimately, the best defense against a crypto scam remains an educated and vigilant investor community. Staying informed about common scam tactics and adhering to best practices for digital asset security are paramount for navigating the evolving cryptocurrency landscape safely. This incident in South Korea serves as a powerful cautionary tale, reminding us that while the crypto market offers innovation, it also demands unwavering caution. Protecting your digital assets starts with awareness, thorough research, and a healthy dose of skepticism towards promises that seem too good to be true. Let this serve as a crucial lesson for all participants in the cryptocurrency space. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About Crypto Scams Q1: What exactly is a crypto scam? A crypto scam is a fraudulent scheme designed to trick individuals into investing in fake cryptocurrencies, projects, or platforms, often with promises of high, guaranteed returns, leading to financial loss for the victims. Q2: How can I identify a potential crypto scam? Look for red flags such as guaranteed high returns, pressure to invest quickly, anonymous teams, vague project details, unofficial communication channels, and claims of exclusive access or listings that cannot be verified. Q3: What should I do if I suspect a crypto scam? If you suspect a scam, do not invest. If you have already invested, stop all communication with the perpetrators, gather all evidence, and report the incident to relevant financial authorities or law enforcement in your region. Q4: Are all cryptocurrencies risky investments? All investments carry some level of risk, and cryptocurrencies are known for their volatility. However, legitimate projects differ significantly from scams. Thorough research and understanding the inherent risks are crucial for any crypto investment. Q5: How can regulators help prevent crypto scams? Regulators play a vital role by establishing clear guidelines, enforcing anti-fraud laws, prosecuting offenders, and educating the public about the risks involved in cryptocurrency investments. International cooperation is also key to tackling cross-border scams. Stay informed and help protect others in the crypto community! If you found this article helpful, please share it on your social media platforms to raise awareness about the dangers of crypto scams and how to avoid them. To learn more about the latest cryptocurrency market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping investor safety and the future of digital assets. This post Shocking Crypto Scam Exposed: Group Referred to Prosecutors Over $4.3M Fraud first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/10/29 15:40