The post The Acolyte’s Villain Revealed To Have A Huge ‘Star Wars’ Role appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Acolyte remains the most controversial Star Wars release outside of The Last Jedi and The Holiday Special, a hugely expensive series that became the center of a culture war, and was cancelled after its first season. The show did have a number of issues, its bright spot was a quasi-Sith called The Stranger, posing as a man named Qimir. The Acolyte ended on a number of teasers, and as it turns out, there were big plans for Qimir in the scope of the Star Wars universe. Here’s director Leslye Headland in the new The Art of The Acolyte book: “It was in the design of the character, as well as knowing that we were going to introduce Darth Plagueis, who has to end up with Palpatine as his apprentice. Following the Rule of Two – a precept that limited the Sith to just two at any given time, a master and an apprentice – one way to keep it going is if the Stranger is the first Knight of Ren, part of a Sith-adjacent cult that we know eventually survives.” The idea was always that Qimir was not a normal Sith, nor would he be integrated into the Master/Apprentice system. Rather, he was going to be the founder of The Knights of Ren, a group introduced in the Disney Star Wars trilogy, of which Kylo Ren was the leader at one point. The Knights of Ren storyline was famously sliced into practically nothing in the final films, with Ren ultimately fighting and killing his former brothers. This news about Qimir and the Knight of Ren joins another big Star Wars news story, where it’s gotten out through star Adam Driver and director Steven Soderbergh that they had a complete draft of a movie called The Hunt for Ben Solo,… The post The Acolyte’s Villain Revealed To Have A Huge ‘Star Wars’ Role appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Acolyte remains the most controversial Star Wars release outside of The Last Jedi and The Holiday Special, a hugely expensive series that became the center of a culture war, and was cancelled after its first season. The show did have a number of issues, its bright spot was a quasi-Sith called The Stranger, posing as a man named Qimir. The Acolyte ended on a number of teasers, and as it turns out, there were big plans for Qimir in the scope of the Star Wars universe. Here’s director Leslye Headland in the new The Art of The Acolyte book: “It was in the design of the character, as well as knowing that we were going to introduce Darth Plagueis, who has to end up with Palpatine as his apprentice. Following the Rule of Two – a precept that limited the Sith to just two at any given time, a master and an apprentice – one way to keep it going is if the Stranger is the first Knight of Ren, part of a Sith-adjacent cult that we know eventually survives.” The idea was always that Qimir was not a normal Sith, nor would he be integrated into the Master/Apprentice system. Rather, he was going to be the founder of The Knights of Ren, a group introduced in the Disney Star Wars trilogy, of which Kylo Ren was the leader at one point. The Knights of Ren storyline was famously sliced into practically nothing in the final films, with Ren ultimately fighting and killing his former brothers. This news about Qimir and the Knight of Ren joins another big Star Wars news story, where it’s gotten out through star Adam Driver and director Steven Soderbergh that they had a complete draft of a movie called The Hunt for Ben Solo,…

The Acolyte’s Villain Revealed To Have A Huge ‘Star Wars’ Role

2025/10/27 23:23

The Acolyte remains the most controversial Star Wars release outside of The Last Jedi and The Holiday Special, a hugely expensive series that became the center of a culture war, and was cancelled after its first season.

The show did have a number of issues, its bright spot was a quasi-Sith called The Stranger, posing as a man named Qimir. The Acolyte ended on a number of teasers, and as it turns out, there were big plans for Qimir in the scope of the Star Wars universe. Here’s director Leslye Headland in the new The Art of The Acolyte book:

“It was in the design of the character, as well as knowing that we were going to introduce Darth Plagueis, who has to end up with Palpatine as his apprentice. Following the Rule of Two – a precept that limited the Sith to just two at any given time, a master and an apprentice – one way to keep it going is if the Stranger is the first Knight of Ren, part of a Sith-adjacent cult that we know eventually survives.”

The idea was always that Qimir was not a normal Sith, nor would he be integrated into the Master/Apprentice system. Rather, he was going to be the founder of The Knights of Ren, a group introduced in the Disney Star Wars trilogy, of which Kylo Ren was the leader at one point. The Knights of Ren storyline was famously sliced into practically nothing in the final films, with Ren ultimately fighting and killing his former brothers.

This news about Qimir and the Knight of Ren joins another big Star Wars news story, where it’s gotten out through star Adam Driver and director Steven Soderbergh that they had a complete draft of a movie called The Hunt for Ben Solo, which would have resurrected the character for more adventures after the events of the trilogy. It likely would have been a good place to dive into his Knights of Ren past, as well.

Disney rejected that and cancelled The Acolyte before any of this manifested. Acolyte fans are mad that the show’s best character was supposed to have this foundational role we never got to see onscreen. Even more Star Wars fans are mad about the Ben Solo movie. Disney is not exactly on fire with its Star Wars era, which will continue with the Mandalorian and Grogu movie soon, and another season of Ahsoka amidst a bunch of Disney Plus one-offs, including The Acolyte. But that was never the plan. Qimir deserved better.

Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram.

Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2025/10/27/the-acolytes-villain-revealed-to-have-a-huge-star-wars-role/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
2025/09/18 03:26