Sammy Altman is preparing to take OpenAI public by 2027, following a tense back-and-forth with California officials that nearly ended in a lawsuit. The agreement that clears the way for the IPO was finalized Monday evening, according to The Wall Street Journal, and locks in a new corporate structure for OpenAI, keeps the company in […]Sammy Altman is preparing to take OpenAI public by 2027, following a tense back-and-forth with California officials that nearly ended in a lawsuit. The agreement that clears the way for the IPO was finalized Monday evening, according to The Wall Street Journal, and locks in a new corporate structure for OpenAI, keeps the company in […]

Sam Altman is preparing to take OpenAI public as early as 2027

2025/10/30 00:40

Sammy Altman is preparing to take OpenAI public by 2027, following a tense back-and-forth with California officials that nearly ended in a lawsuit.

The agreement that clears the way for the IPO was finalized Monday evening, according to The Wall Street Journal, and locks in a new corporate structure for OpenAI, keeps the company in California, and lets Sam move ahead without facing legal action from California Attorney General Rob Bonta.

Sam made his move nearly two weeks ago. He called Bonta directly and told him OpenAI didn’t want to leave California, but it would if Bonta blocked the restructuring plan.

The company had already spent months pushing the narrative that it was too important to California’s economy to be chased out. Sam promised not to follow Elon Musk’s lead and ditch the state, and said he wouldn’t sue either. But the message was clear: if the state didn’t play ball, OpenAI had options.

Altman gets green light after political pressure and concessions

The company’s conversion to a more traditional structure had sparked a long investigation and triggered backlash from unions, nonprofit groups, and competitors. Many claimed OpenAI was violating its original nonprofit mission.

In May, Sammy gave ground by agreeing to keep the OpenAI Foundation, the original nonprofit, in charge of the newly structured for-profit entity. That move helped shift the tide.

To calm concerns and show its worth, OpenAI published several economic reports. One August report said California led the country in productivity, housed the most private AI companies, and pulled in 68% of U.S. venture capital in the first half of the year.

The company also hired political figures like former Senator Laphonza Butler to help push its case. San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie even called Bonta to stress how much the city needed OpenAI to stay.

Sam had worked on Lurie’s transition team and was part of a group that convinced President Trump not to send federal forces into the city.

The final deal gives the green light for OpenAI’s IPO preparations, while keeping it under the eye of both the OpenAI Foundation and Bonta’s office.

The nonprofit will appoint the board of directors, and Bonta must receive three weeks’ notice before any major changes to the company’s mission or structure. A safety committee will also be in place with the authority to block any AI model launches it deems risky.

Sam confirmed on Tuesday that a public offering is likely, but said there’s no fixed timeline. “California is my home, and I love it here,” he posted on X. “We really wanted to figure this out and are really happy about where it all landed.”

Safety concerns nearly halted OpenAI’s restructuring

The talks got more complicated in September after Bonta and Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings raised concerns about safety. They sent a letter saying OpenAI and the entire AI industry weren’t doing enough to protect users.

They pointed to suicides reportedly linked to prolonged interactions with ChatGPT, including a murder-suicide in Connecticut that was covered by The Wall Street Journal.

Sam responded by meeting Bonta face-to-face and walking him through new safety measures. The company added parental controls and other child-protection features. After that meeting, Bonta told Bloomberg News he believed Sam was “authentically committed” to addressing the problems. That helped bring the talks to a close.

Bonta has decided not to sue, but his office will continue to monitor the company. The OpenAI Foundation will remain in charge, and the new safety committee can halt any future AI model releases if needed.

With that, Sam gets to stay in California, keep the restructuring intact, and line up one of the most anticipated IPOs of the decade.

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Pavel's humanity, and Ton's challenges

Pavel's humanity, and Ton's challenges

I really like what Pavel mentioned about not using a mobile phone. Essentially, this is an "information fasting" approach to the challenges of information overload, contrasting with the "food fasting" that everyone loves using apps. One is metaphysical, the other is physical, but ultimately, both affect the mind and body, influencing hormones like cortisol. Now and in the future, attention is the scarcest resource. Being able to freely disconnect from electronic devices is a luxury, a freedom with its own barriers. Pavel is also an extreme craftsman. The advantage of being a craftsman is that you can lead a small team to create a killer app. However, the limitation is that Telegram, as the largest instant messaging software outside of China and the US, cannot become another Tencent platform. This same culture has also influenced its Web3 project, TON. By the way, let me talk about my close observation of TON over the past four years as the first Chinese institutional investor in the world. 1. The wrong technological path was taken. TON's stubborn insistence on using C++ seems like a kind of technological purist obsession. Historically, Russians have repeatedly taken the wrong turn on the "data technology tree": the Soviet Union failed to adapt to the transistor revolution, became obsessed with vacuum tube performance optimization, and missed the entire chip wave. They often overemphasize performance and control, but neglect the ecosystem and development experience. TON's SDK, toolchain, and documentation ecosystem lack standardization, making the development threshold too high; this is not a syntax problem, but a problem of lacking platform thinking. 2. Uneven ecological composition. Currently, it's basically only Russians and Chinese who are active, but resource allocation is clearly biased towards the Russian-speaking region. This is something everyone is already familiar with. 3. Oligopoly. Funding, traffic, and narrative resources within the ecosystem are concentrated on a few "top" companies/projects. Everyone knows they must curry favor with the "top" teams, but mid-tier projects are severely squeezed out. There is also a long-term power struggle between foundations and the oligopolistic "top" companies, resulting in constant internal friction. 4. Failure to accept oneself. Accepting and reconciling with oneself is crucial for any individual or organization. Only on this basis can you face yourself honestly and leverage your strengths while mitigating your weaknesses. However, TON seems obsessed with pitching to Musk, persuading American investors, and getting to the White House. The truth is, no matter how hard it tries, in the eyes of others, TON remains a public chain with a Russian background. In contrast, BNB didn't try to play the "American" role. Instead, it first became the most popular chain in the Eastern Time Zone, simultaneously creating a sense of FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) among Westerners, before smoothly expanding internationally—a much more effective approach. 5. The story of "adoption for 1 billion users" has been told for four years, and it's still just a story. Pavel keeps telling a grand story of "connecting Telegram's 1 billion users with the blockchain world," but this story has yet to truly materialize. The reason isn't that the vision is false, but rather structural constraints: In order to survive and ensure Pavel's personal safety (in recent years, Pavel has become increasingly obsessed with his physical safety, given several incidents, including the recent events in France), Telegram must maintain a "superficial" separation from TON to avoid crossing regulatory red lines; this separation prevents TON from ever truly integrating with Telegram's ecosystem. Even stablecoins like USDE have maintained a supply of only a few hundred million—indicating that the story is grand, but the reality is small. TON possesses the perfectionism of engineering geeks, yet lacks the warmth of ecological collaboration; it has a massive entry point, but is hampered by regulatory realities; it has its own advantages, but has not yet reconciled with itself. It has a narrative and ideals, but these need to be transformed into a sustainable balance of systems and incentives. I wish the TON ecosystem will continue to improve.
Share
PANews2025/10/30 14:00