The post Monero, record reorganization: 18 blocks rewritten appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On September 14, 2025, the Monero network experienced a deep reorganization: an alternative longer chain supplanted 18 consecutive blocks, rendering 118 transactions no longer confirmed and erasing about 36 minutes of history. The episode — reported by CoinDesk and contextualized by the official documentation of GetMonero — reopens the discussion on the resilience of the ecosystem. Reorg depth: 18 blocks (a historical record for Monero). Transactions involved: 118 transactions made unconfirmed. Time window: approximately 36 minutes of history rewritten. What Happened: Timeline and Context The event began at height 3,499,659 and propagated for 18 blocks, when the nodes accepted a longer chain proposed by the mining component associated with Qubic. In this instance, the previous blocks became orphaned, reverting 118 transactions to the “unconfirmed” state. For further verification, you can consult the Monero block explorer at the indicated height. According to the data collected from public explorer logs and reports from node operators contacted for this article, the reorg was visible in various parts of the network within minutes of the publication of the alternative chain. Industry analysts note that the temporary control of over 50% of the hashrate — estimated by the community to be around 51% in the hours leading up to the event — facilitated the replacement of the blockchain history. In the previous period, Qubic – a layer‑1 project focused on AI workloads – would have concentrated over 50% of Monero’s hashrate, according to community estimates available on miningpoolstats.stream. It should be noted that the aggregation of power in a few actors is a signal to monitor. Immediate Impact on Network and Market Network: payments considered final have returned to pending and some wallets and services have increased the number of confirmations required for greater caution. Market: in the short term, the price of XMR has… The post Monero, record reorganization: 18 blocks rewritten appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On September 14, 2025, the Monero network experienced a deep reorganization: an alternative longer chain supplanted 18 consecutive blocks, rendering 118 transactions no longer confirmed and erasing about 36 minutes of history. The episode — reported by CoinDesk and contextualized by the official documentation of GetMonero — reopens the discussion on the resilience of the ecosystem. Reorg depth: 18 blocks (a historical record for Monero). Transactions involved: 118 transactions made unconfirmed. Time window: approximately 36 minutes of history rewritten. What Happened: Timeline and Context The event began at height 3,499,659 and propagated for 18 blocks, when the nodes accepted a longer chain proposed by the mining component associated with Qubic. In this instance, the previous blocks became orphaned, reverting 118 transactions to the “unconfirmed” state. For further verification, you can consult the Monero block explorer at the indicated height. According to the data collected from public explorer logs and reports from node operators contacted for this article, the reorg was visible in various parts of the network within minutes of the publication of the alternative chain. Industry analysts note that the temporary control of over 50% of the hashrate — estimated by the community to be around 51% in the hours leading up to the event — facilitated the replacement of the blockchain history. In the previous period, Qubic – a layer‑1 project focused on AI workloads – would have concentrated over 50% of Monero’s hashrate, according to community estimates available on miningpoolstats.stream. It should be noted that the aggregation of power in a few actors is a signal to monitor. Immediate Impact on Network and Market Network: payments considered final have returned to pending and some wallets and services have increased the number of confirmations required for greater caution. Market: in the short term, the price of XMR has…

Monero, record reorganization: 18 blocks rewritten

2025/09/16 05:55

On September 14, 2025, the Monero network experienced a deep reorganization: an alternative longer chain supplanted 18 consecutive blocks, rendering 118 transactions no longer confirmed and erasing about 36 minutes of history.

The episode — reported by CoinDesk and contextualized by the official documentation of GetMonero — reopens the discussion on the resilience of the ecosystem.

  • Reorg depth: 18 blocks (a historical record for Monero).
  • Transactions involved: 118 transactions made unconfirmed.
  • Time window: approximately 36 minutes of history rewritten.

What Happened: Timeline and Context

The event began at height 3,499,659 and propagated for 18 blocks, when the nodes accepted a longer chain proposed by the mining component associated with Qubic.

In this instance, the previous blocks became orphaned, reverting 118 transactions to the “unconfirmed” state. For further verification, you can consult the Monero block explorer at the indicated height.

According to the data collected from public explorer logs and reports from node operators contacted for this article, the reorg was visible in various parts of the network within minutes of the publication of the alternative chain.

Industry analysts note that the temporary control of over 50% of the hashrate — estimated by the community to be around 51% in the hours leading up to the event — facilitated the replacement of the blockchain history.

In the previous period, Qubic – a layer‑1 project focused on AI workloads – would have concentrated over 50% of Monero’s hashrate, according to community estimates available on miningpoolstats.stream. It should be noted that the aggregation of power in a few actors is a signal to monitor.

Immediate Impact on Network and Market

  • Network: payments considered final have returned to pending and some wallets and services have increased the number of confirmations required for greater caution.
  • Market: in the short term, the price of XMR has shown volatility, with a peak of around $333 and a subsequent retracement towards $307.5, as indicated by CoinGecko. This recently collected data also highlights liquidity variations.
  • Volume: the trading volume reached approximately $136 million in the last 24 hours, with an increase of 78% compared to the previous day, according to CoinGecko data.

Impact on Network Security

A deep reorg can occur when a single actor controls a significant share of computing power.

In fact, the principle “the longest chain wins” can overturn recent confirmations, temporarily undermining the operational trust of users and operators until the distribution of hashrate rebalances.

Technical Details: Why 118 Transactions Returned Unconfirmed

The Monero network nodes adopt the chain with the most work rule. When a sequence of blocks longer than the currently accepted one is proposed, the nodes switch to the new history, marking the previous blocks as orphans.

The transactions present in those blocks are taken back from the mempool and must be confirmed again, with possible variations in the order of inclusion.

That said, although the consensus rules are capable of preventing a double-spend, prolonged time windows can make certain risks more concrete.

uPoW and hashrate concentration

Qubic adopts a useful proof‑of‑work (uPoW) model where computational energy is used for “useful” tasks (such as AI). Additionally, the XMR rewards earned by miners can be converted to be reused within the Qubic ecosystem – for example, for buyback operations and token burn – as described in the official Qubic documentation and on the qubic.org website.

According to independent developers and analysts, this scheme can incentivize the concentration of hashrate in a single cluster, resulting in an increased risk of deep reorganizations if an alternative chain is published.

Operating Numbers and Methodology

  • Orphan rate in the last 720 blocks (approximately 24 hours): 213 orphan blocks have been identified, accounting for about 29.5% of the total, calculated by summing the blocks not included in the main chain, as reported by public explorer logs.
  • Composition: of these, 114 orphan blocks are attributed to known pools, while 99 come from unknown pools or individual miners.
  • Method: the data was obtained through a manual count on a 24-hour rolling window, with sampling at regular intervals and deduplication by height, using data from public Monero network explorers.

Solutions Under Discussion: DNS Checkpoints and Alternatives

An immediate proposal to mitigate the risks of extended reorgs is the introduction of DNS checkpoints: “signed” snapshots of the chain state distributed via DNS and managed by multiple maintainers, in order to reduce the effects of a deep reorganization.

However, this solution carries the risk of introducing an element of trust and a degree of centralization that could conflict with the inherently decentralized philosophy of Monero.

In parallel, the community is evaluating other corrective measures, such as adjusting difficulty parameters, adopting multi-party temporary checkpoints, limits on reordering beyond a certain depth, and improvements in block propagation to reduce the advantage of private chains. In this context, the balance between security and decentralization remains central.

Reactions of the community and traders

On GitHub, the researcher Rucknium described the temporary implementation of DNS checkpoints as “highly likely,” pending further evaluations on potential protocol changes (monero‑project/monero · issues).

Several long-standing community members have cautioned, arguing that a quick solution should not normalize reliance on trusted lists.

The journalist Vini Barbosa has expressed operational distrust towards the network at this juncture, announcing a precautionary halt to the acceptance of XMR payments “until technical clarifications are provided” on X (statement recently published on X [data to be verified]). His summary: «Personally, I do not consider the Monero network reliable at this moment».

What changes for users and services

  • Confirmations: it is likely that exchanges and merchants will require a higher number of confirmations to reduce operational risk during periods of instability.
  • Wallet: payments returned to the “unconfirmed” state should be re-included in subsequent blocks, although the order of inclusion may vary.
  • Volatility: phenomena related to consensus can amplify price movements and the spread in the markets, especially in the presence of variable liquidity.

Quick Glossary

  • Reorganization (reorg): replacement of a series of blocks with another chain that has a greater amount of cumulative work.
  • Orphan block: a valid block that, following a reorg, is not included in the main chain.
  • Hashrate: the total computational power used in mining; a high concentration can facilitate the imposition of alternative chains.
  • uPoW (useful proof‑of‑work): a scheme that allocates computing power to tasks considered “useful,” while simultaneously maintaining economic incentives for participants.
  • DNS checkpoints: snapshot of the chain distributed via DNS and signed by trusted operators to limit the scope of deep reorgs.

Conclusions

The reorganization episode, which occurred on September 14, 2025, highlights a structural tension between decentralization, economic security, and mining incentives. As long as the distribution of hashrate remains concentrated, the possibility of significant reorganizations remains tangible.

The solutions discussed – from DNS checkpoints to potential protocol modifications – aim to restore an operational finality in line with user expectations without distorting the original architecture of the project.

Updated on September 15, 2025.

Methodological Note and Sources

Source: https://en.cryptonomist.ch/2025/09/15/monero-record-reorganization-18-blocks-rewritten-and-118-transactions-made-unconfirmed/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

US Spot ETH ETFs Witness Remarkable $244M Inflow Surge

US Spot ETH ETFs Witness Remarkable $244M Inflow Surge

BitcoinWorld US Spot ETH ETFs Witness Remarkable $244M Inflow Surge The world of digital assets is buzzing with exciting news! US spot ETH ETFs recently experienced a significant milestone, recording a whopping $244 million in net inflows on October 28. This marks the second consecutive day of positive movement for these crucial investment vehicles, signaling a growing appetite for Ethereum exposure among mainstream investors. What’s Fueling the Latest US Spot ETH ETFs Inflow? This impressive influx of capital into US spot ETH ETFs highlights a clear trend: institutional and retail investors are increasingly comfortable with regulated crypto investment products. The figures, reported by industry tracker Trader T, show a robust interest that could reshape the market. Fidelity’s FETH led the charge, attracting a substantial $99.27 million. This demonstrates strong confidence in Fidelity’s offering and Ethereum’s long-term potential. BlackRock’s ETHA wasn’t far behind, securing $74.74 million in inflows. BlackRock’s entry into the crypto ETF space has been closely watched, and these numbers confirm its growing influence. Grayscale’s Mini ETH also saw significant action, pulling in $73.03 million. This new product is quickly gaining traction, offering investors another avenue for Ethereum exposure. It’s important to note that while most products saw positive flows, Grayscale’s ETHE experienced a net outflow of $2.66 million. This might suggest a shift in investor preference towards newer, perhaps more cost-effective, spot ETF options. Why Are US Spot ETH ETFs Attracting Such Significant Capital? The appeal of US spot ETH ETFs is multifaceted. For many investors, these products offer a regulated and accessible way to gain exposure to Ethereum without directly owning the cryptocurrency. This removes some of the complexities associated with digital asset management, such as setting up wallets, managing private keys, or dealing with less regulated exchanges. Key benefits include: Accessibility: Investors can buy and sell shares of the ETF through traditional brokerage accounts, just like stocks. Regulation: Being regulated by financial authorities provides a layer of security and trust that some investors seek. Diversification: For traditional portfolios, adding exposure to a leading altcoin like Ethereum through an ETF can offer diversification benefits. Liquidity: ETFs are generally liquid, allowing for easy entry and exit from positions. Moreover, Ethereum itself continues to be a powerhouse in the blockchain space, underpinning a vast ecosystem of decentralized applications (dApps), NFTs, and decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols. Its ongoing development and significant network activity make it an attractive asset for long-term growth. What Does This US Spot ETH ETFs Trend Mean for Investors? The consistent positive inflows into US spot ETH ETFs could be a strong indicator of maturing institutional interest in the broader crypto market. It suggests that major financial players are not just dabbling but are actively integrating digital assets into their investment strategies. For individual investors, this trend offers several actionable insights: Market Validation: The increasing capital flow validates Ethereum’s position as a significant digital asset with real-world utility and investor demand. Potential for Growth: Continued institutional adoption through ETFs could contribute to greater price stability and potential upward momentum for Ethereum. Observing Investor Behavior: The shift from products like Grayscale’s ETHE to newer spot ETFs highlights how investors are becoming more discerning about their investment vehicles, prioritizing efficiency and cost. However, it is crucial to remember that the crypto market remains volatile. While these inflows are positive, investors should always conduct their own research and consider their risk tolerance before making investment decisions. A Compelling Outlook for US Spot ETH ETFs The recent $244 million net inflow into US spot ETH ETFs is more than just a number; it’s a powerful signal. It underscores a growing confidence in Ethereum as an asset class and the increasing mainstream acceptance of regulated cryptocurrency investment products. With major players like Fidelity and BlackRock leading the charge, the landscape for digital asset investment is evolving rapidly, offering exciting new opportunities for both seasoned and new investors alike. This positive momentum suggests a potentially bright future for Ethereum’s integration into traditional financial portfolios. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) What is a US spot ETH ETF? A US spot ETH ETF (Exchange-Traded Fund) is an investment product that allows investors to gain exposure to the price movements of Ethereum (ETH) without directly owning the cryptocurrency. The fund holds actual Ethereum, and shares of the fund are traded on traditional stock exchanges. Which firms are leading the inflows into US spot ETH ETFs? On October 28, Fidelity’s FETH led with $99.27 million, followed by BlackRock’s ETHA with $74.74 million, and Grayscale’s Mini ETH with $73.03 million. Why are spot ETH ETFs important for the crypto market? Spot ETH ETFs are crucial because they provide a regulated, accessible, and often more familiar investment vehicle for traditional investors to enter the cryptocurrency market. This can lead to increased institutional adoption, greater liquidity, and enhanced legitimacy for Ethereum as an asset class. What was Grayscale’s ETHE outflow and what does it signify? Grayscale’s ETHE experienced a net outflow of $2.66 million. This might indicate that some investors are shifting capital from older, perhaps less efficient, Grayscale products to newer spot ETH ETFs, which often offer better fee structures or direct exposure without the previous trust structure limitations. If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network! Your support helps us bring more valuable insights into the world of cryptocurrency. Spread the word and let others discover the exciting trends shaping the digital asset space. To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum institutional adoption. This post US Spot ETH ETFs Witness Remarkable $244M Inflow Surge first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
2025/10/29 11:45
First Ethereum Treasury Firm Sells ETH For Buybacks: Death Spiral Incoming?

First Ethereum Treasury Firm Sells ETH For Buybacks: Death Spiral Incoming?

Ethereum-focused treasury company ETHZilla said it has sold roughly $40 million worth of ether to fund ongoing share repurchases, a maneuver aimed at closing what it calls a “significant discount to NAV.” In a press statement on Monday, the company disclosed that since Friday, October 24, it has bought back about 600,000 common shares for approximately $12 million under a broader authorization of up to $250 million, and that it intends to continue buying while the discount persists. ETHZilla Dumps ETH For BuyBacks The company framed the buybacks as balance-sheet arbitrage rather than a strategic retreat from its core Ethereum exposure. “We are leveraging the strength of our balance sheet, including reducing our ETH holdings, to execute share repurchases,” chairman and CEO McAndrew Rudisill said, adding that ETH sales are being used as “cash” while common shares trade below net asset value. He argued the transactions would be immediately accretive to remaining shareholders. Related Reading: Crypto Analyst Shows The Possibility Of The Ethereum Price Reaching $16,000 ETHZilla amplified the message on X, saying it would “use its strong balance sheet to support shareholders through buybacks, reduce shares available for short borrow, [and] drive up NAV per share” and reiterating that it still holds “~$400 million of ETH” on the balance sheet and carries “no net debt.” The company also cited “recent, concentrated short selling” as a factor keeping the stock under pressure. The market-structure logic is straightforward: when a digital-asset treasury trades below the value of its coin holdings and cash, buying back stock with “coin-cash” can, in theory, collapse the discount and lift NAV per share. But the optics are contentious inside crypto because the mechanism requires selling the underlying asset—here, ETH—to purchase equity, potentially weakening the very treasury backing that investors originally sought. Death Spiral Incoming? Popular crypto trader SalsaTekila (@SalsaTekila) commented on X: “This is extremely bearish, especially if it invites similar behavior. ETH treasuries are not Saylor; they haven’t shown diamond-hand will. If treasury companies start dumping the coin to buy shares, it’s a death spiral setup.” Skeptics also zeroed in on funding choices. “I am mostly curious why the company chose to sell ETH and not use the $569m in cash they had on the balance sheet last month,” another analyst Dan Smith wrote, noting ETHZilla had just said it still holds about $400 million of ETH and thus didn’t deploy it on fresh ETH accumulation. “Why not just use cash?” The question cuts to the core of treasury signaling: using ETH as a liquidity reservoir to defend a discounted equity can be read as rational capital allocation, or as capitulation that undermines the ETH-as-reserve narrative. Beyond the buyback, a retail-driven storyline has rapidly formed around the stock. Business Insider reported that Dimitri Semenikhin—who recently became the face of the Beyond Meat surge—has targeted ETHZilla, saying he purchased roughly 2% of the company at what he views as a 50% discount to modified NAV. He has argued that the market is misreading ETHZilla’s balance sheet because it still reflects legacy biotech results rather than the current digital-asset treasury model. Related Reading: Ethereum Emerges As The Sole Trillion-Dollar Institutional Store Of Value — Here’s Why The same report cites liquid holdings on the order of 102,300 ETH and roughly $560 million in cash, translating to about $62 per share in liquid assets, and calls out a 1-for-10 reverse split on October 15 that, in his view, muddied the optics for retail. Semenikhin flagged November 13 as a potential catalyst if results show the pivot to ETH generating profits. The company’s own messaging emphasizes the discount-to-NAV lens rather than a change in strategy. ETHZilla told investors it would keep buying while the stock trades below asset value and highlighted a goal of shrinking lendable supply to blunt short-selling pressure. For Ethereum markets, the immediate flow effect is limited—$40 million is marginal in ETH’s daily liquidity—but the second-order risk flagged by traders is behavioral contagion. If other ETH-heavy treasuries follow the playbook, selling the underlying to buy their own stock, the flow could become pro-cyclical: coins are sold to close equity discounts, the selling pressures spot, and wider discounts reappear as equity screens rerate to the weaker mark—repeat. That is the “death spiral” scenario skeptics warn about when the treasury asset doubles as the company’s signal of conviction. At press time, ETH traded at $4,156. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
2025/10/29 12:00