The post Killer Whales launched season 2 but no one noticed appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Last year, Hello Labs and CoinMarketCap embarked on a new calling: reality television. Protos reviewed the first season of Killer Whales, and while we were largely unimpressed, it’s hard to imagine we would miss out on watching every episode of the second season. When Killer Whales premiered in May on Google Play and Apple TV, few, if any, media outlets were made aware. Fortunately, while anyone keen on watching can now see episodes one through four for free on YouTube, Protos has once again decided to wade through the entire series pre-full, free public release so you don’t have to. Read more: Opinion: Killer Whales misses Lazy series but at least nothing important happens It’s hard to describe just how little happened over the course of five episodes. I can, however, tell you about a handful of strange, pointless decisions that the production teams made. For instance, the first episode features a co-hosting duo: the annoying and personality-less ThreadGuy and the Andrew Tate fart-sniffing Aiden Ross. Ross’s time is cut short, and after the first few minutes of episode one, he never appears again. But why feature a Trump-loving, Dubai-residing, degenerate loser for three minutes of a five episode series? That’s left for you to decide. The rest of the show is a never ending parade of unlovable deadbeat judges, from no-name crypto exchange execs to crypto influencers with more bot followers than real people. You can be assured it’s a particularly awful group of judges when the highest profile among them is former Trump appointee Anthony Scaramucci, who, along with the equally irritating Mario Nawfal, seems to get the most screen time. The set is cheap, the writing is bland and corny, and the ability to differentiate one stupid project from another is impossible. Shark Tank, but we don’t… The post Killer Whales launched season 2 but no one noticed appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Last year, Hello Labs and CoinMarketCap embarked on a new calling: reality television. Protos reviewed the first season of Killer Whales, and while we were largely unimpressed, it’s hard to imagine we would miss out on watching every episode of the second season. When Killer Whales premiered in May on Google Play and Apple TV, few, if any, media outlets were made aware. Fortunately, while anyone keen on watching can now see episodes one through four for free on YouTube, Protos has once again decided to wade through the entire series pre-full, free public release so you don’t have to. Read more: Opinion: Killer Whales misses Lazy series but at least nothing important happens It’s hard to describe just how little happened over the course of five episodes. I can, however, tell you about a handful of strange, pointless decisions that the production teams made. For instance, the first episode features a co-hosting duo: the annoying and personality-less ThreadGuy and the Andrew Tate fart-sniffing Aiden Ross. Ross’s time is cut short, and after the first few minutes of episode one, he never appears again. But why feature a Trump-loving, Dubai-residing, degenerate loser for three minutes of a five episode series? That’s left for you to decide. The rest of the show is a never ending parade of unlovable deadbeat judges, from no-name crypto exchange execs to crypto influencers with more bot followers than real people. You can be assured it’s a particularly awful group of judges when the highest profile among them is former Trump appointee Anthony Scaramucci, who, along with the equally irritating Mario Nawfal, seems to get the most screen time. The set is cheap, the writing is bland and corny, and the ability to differentiate one stupid project from another is impossible. Shark Tank, but we don’t…

Killer Whales launched season 2 but no one noticed

2025/10/22 01:53

Last year, Hello Labs and CoinMarketCap embarked on a new calling: reality television. Protos reviewed the first season of Killer Whales, and while we were largely unimpressed, it’s hard to imagine we would miss out on watching every episode of the second season.

When Killer Whales premiered in May on Google Play and Apple TV, few, if any, media outlets were made aware.

Fortunately, while anyone keen on watching can now see episodes one through four for free on YouTube, Protos has once again decided to wade through the entire series pre-full, free public release so you don’t have to.

Read more: Opinion: Killer Whales misses

Lazy series but at least nothing important happens

It’s hard to describe just how little happened over the course of five episodes.

I can, however, tell you about a handful of strange, pointless decisions that the production teams made.

For instance, the first episode features a co-hosting duo: the annoying and personality-less ThreadGuy and the Andrew Tate fart-sniffing Aiden Ross.

Ross’s time is cut short, and after the first few minutes of episode one, he never appears again.

But why feature a Trump-loving, Dubai-residing, degenerate loser for three minutes of a five episode series? That’s left for you to decide.

The rest of the show is a never ending parade of unlovable deadbeat judges, from no-name crypto exchange execs to crypto influencers with more bot followers than real people.

You can be assured it’s a particularly awful group of judges when the highest profile among them is former Trump appointee Anthony Scaramucci, who, along with the equally irritating Mario Nawfal, seems to get the most screen time.

The set is cheap, the writing is bland and corny, and the ability to differentiate one stupid project from another is impossible.

Shark Tank, but we don’t want to get sued

The creators of Killer Whales would have you believe this show is similar to Shark Tank — not exactly high brow TV viewing, but a fun, undemanding watch — but that’s not the case.

It’s hard to describe any of the sharks on Shark Tank as likeable, but it’s fair to say they’re putting something on the line for the projects they support, albeit minimally: money, time, and energy.

However, it’s unclear to me, even after hours of time spent watching this atrocity, what any project actually wins. They mention the fact that the show is “giving away $1.5 million in prizes,” including “an accelerator program from the legendary CoinMarketCap.”

However, exactly what this CoinMarketCap accelerator program is and how it’s valued is left for you to decide.

No other prizes were ever mentioned, but even if every project that got a yes from the judges was to receive any equal cut of an all-cash prize pool, it would amount to little more than a couple hundred thousands dollars.

This is pennies in the tip jar for these projects, many of which have already raised millions in venture capital.

By taking away stakes for judges and not bothering to mention what any of these projects are playing for, Killer Whales has seemingly already failed the first rule of storytelling: have a beginning, middle, and end.

Highlights (don’t worry, it’s only a few)

If you haven’t watched YouTuber Atrioc streaming the first episode, it’s very funny (particularly when a project suggests it will usher in the future with 3D NFTs).

The first episode also features a bagholder in a cybertruck shilling a memecoin (this “project” somehow gets funded), while in episode three, the gang accidentally funds a sniping bot on Solana.

In the season finale (not yet available for free on YouTube), TransHuman Coin — one of the few projects that’s seen an increase in its token value since the show was released in May — described itself like so:

“Our mission at Transhuman Coin is to push the capabilities of humanity, so we don’t accept death and disease as given. TransHuman Coin is the official token of the TransHuman Movement.”

It’s clear that there isn’t much of an audience for this watered down, cryptofied version of Shark Tank: views for episode one of season two were nearly 25,000, yet views for episode four only number in the hundreds.

How did the whales fare?

Below is a list of featured projects where public data shows whether they have gone up or down in value since the release of the show in May:

  • Karate Combat: down 52%
  • Brett on Based: down 60%
  • WAGMI Games: down 93%
  • Elixir Games: down 72%
  • Bitscrunch: down 56%
  • Galileo Protocol: down 37%
  • Carv: down 56%
  • Paw: down 60%
  • Birb: up 6.7%
  • TransHuman Coin: up 15%

The only two projects that are up since May weren’t funded by the whales.

Dumb, bad concept, significantly dumber and worse show

There’s no problem with the concept of Killer Whales just because it revolves around cryptocurrency, rather the fact that most of the projects featured aren’t businesses or ventures but almost exclusively memecoins and bizarre rugpulls.

The unfortunate reality for is that it’s just a poorly thought out and boring show.

No one knows what anybody receives for winning, the rules aren’t fully explained, and there’s no build up over the course of five episodes.

It feels as though the creators just took the worst parts of Shark Tank and the most mundane garbage from The Apprentice and combined them to make a simply terrible reality television show that no one with a functional brain would take the time to watch.

But hey, that’s why I’m here.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source: https://protos.com/opinion-killer-whales-launched-season-2-but-no-one-noticed/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

US Spot ETH ETFs Witness Remarkable $244M Inflow Surge

US Spot ETH ETFs Witness Remarkable $244M Inflow Surge

BitcoinWorld US Spot ETH ETFs Witness Remarkable $244M Inflow Surge The world of digital assets is buzzing with exciting news! US spot ETH ETFs recently experienced a significant milestone, recording a whopping $244 million in net inflows on October 28. This marks the second consecutive day of positive movement for these crucial investment vehicles, signaling a growing appetite for Ethereum exposure among mainstream investors. What’s Fueling the Latest US Spot ETH ETFs Inflow? This impressive influx of capital into US spot ETH ETFs highlights a clear trend: institutional and retail investors are increasingly comfortable with regulated crypto investment products. The figures, reported by industry tracker Trader T, show a robust interest that could reshape the market. Fidelity’s FETH led the charge, attracting a substantial $99.27 million. This demonstrates strong confidence in Fidelity’s offering and Ethereum’s long-term potential. BlackRock’s ETHA wasn’t far behind, securing $74.74 million in inflows. BlackRock’s entry into the crypto ETF space has been closely watched, and these numbers confirm its growing influence. Grayscale’s Mini ETH also saw significant action, pulling in $73.03 million. This new product is quickly gaining traction, offering investors another avenue for Ethereum exposure. It’s important to note that while most products saw positive flows, Grayscale’s ETHE experienced a net outflow of $2.66 million. This might suggest a shift in investor preference towards newer, perhaps more cost-effective, spot ETF options. Why Are US Spot ETH ETFs Attracting Such Significant Capital? The appeal of US spot ETH ETFs is multifaceted. For many investors, these products offer a regulated and accessible way to gain exposure to Ethereum without directly owning the cryptocurrency. This removes some of the complexities associated with digital asset management, such as setting up wallets, managing private keys, or dealing with less regulated exchanges. Key benefits include: Accessibility: Investors can buy and sell shares of the ETF through traditional brokerage accounts, just like stocks. Regulation: Being regulated by financial authorities provides a layer of security and trust that some investors seek. Diversification: For traditional portfolios, adding exposure to a leading altcoin like Ethereum through an ETF can offer diversification benefits. Liquidity: ETFs are generally liquid, allowing for easy entry and exit from positions. Moreover, Ethereum itself continues to be a powerhouse in the blockchain space, underpinning a vast ecosystem of decentralized applications (dApps), NFTs, and decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols. Its ongoing development and significant network activity make it an attractive asset for long-term growth. What Does This US Spot ETH ETFs Trend Mean for Investors? The consistent positive inflows into US spot ETH ETFs could be a strong indicator of maturing institutional interest in the broader crypto market. It suggests that major financial players are not just dabbling but are actively integrating digital assets into their investment strategies. For individual investors, this trend offers several actionable insights: Market Validation: The increasing capital flow validates Ethereum’s position as a significant digital asset with real-world utility and investor demand. Potential for Growth: Continued institutional adoption through ETFs could contribute to greater price stability and potential upward momentum for Ethereum. Observing Investor Behavior: The shift from products like Grayscale’s ETHE to newer spot ETFs highlights how investors are becoming more discerning about their investment vehicles, prioritizing efficiency and cost. However, it is crucial to remember that the crypto market remains volatile. While these inflows are positive, investors should always conduct their own research and consider their risk tolerance before making investment decisions. A Compelling Outlook for US Spot ETH ETFs The recent $244 million net inflow into US spot ETH ETFs is more than just a number; it’s a powerful signal. It underscores a growing confidence in Ethereum as an asset class and the increasing mainstream acceptance of regulated cryptocurrency investment products. With major players like Fidelity and BlackRock leading the charge, the landscape for digital asset investment is evolving rapidly, offering exciting new opportunities for both seasoned and new investors alike. This positive momentum suggests a potentially bright future for Ethereum’s integration into traditional financial portfolios. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) What is a US spot ETH ETF? A US spot ETH ETF (Exchange-Traded Fund) is an investment product that allows investors to gain exposure to the price movements of Ethereum (ETH) without directly owning the cryptocurrency. The fund holds actual Ethereum, and shares of the fund are traded on traditional stock exchanges. Which firms are leading the inflows into US spot ETH ETFs? On October 28, Fidelity’s FETH led with $99.27 million, followed by BlackRock’s ETHA with $74.74 million, and Grayscale’s Mini ETH with $73.03 million. Why are spot ETH ETFs important for the crypto market? Spot ETH ETFs are crucial because they provide a regulated, accessible, and often more familiar investment vehicle for traditional investors to enter the cryptocurrency market. This can lead to increased institutional adoption, greater liquidity, and enhanced legitimacy for Ethereum as an asset class. What was Grayscale’s ETHE outflow and what does it signify? Grayscale’s ETHE experienced a net outflow of $2.66 million. This might indicate that some investors are shifting capital from older, perhaps less efficient, Grayscale products to newer spot ETH ETFs, which often offer better fee structures or direct exposure without the previous trust structure limitations. If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network! Your support helps us bring more valuable insights into the world of cryptocurrency. Spread the word and let others discover the exciting trends shaping the digital asset space. To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum institutional adoption. This post US Spot ETH ETFs Witness Remarkable $244M Inflow Surge first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
2025/10/29 11:45
First Ethereum Treasury Firm Sells ETH For Buybacks: Death Spiral Incoming?

First Ethereum Treasury Firm Sells ETH For Buybacks: Death Spiral Incoming?

Ethereum-focused treasury company ETHZilla said it has sold roughly $40 million worth of ether to fund ongoing share repurchases, a maneuver aimed at closing what it calls a “significant discount to NAV.” In a press statement on Monday, the company disclosed that since Friday, October 24, it has bought back about 600,000 common shares for approximately $12 million under a broader authorization of up to $250 million, and that it intends to continue buying while the discount persists. ETHZilla Dumps ETH For BuyBacks The company framed the buybacks as balance-sheet arbitrage rather than a strategic retreat from its core Ethereum exposure. “We are leveraging the strength of our balance sheet, including reducing our ETH holdings, to execute share repurchases,” chairman and CEO McAndrew Rudisill said, adding that ETH sales are being used as “cash” while common shares trade below net asset value. He argued the transactions would be immediately accretive to remaining shareholders. Related Reading: Crypto Analyst Shows The Possibility Of The Ethereum Price Reaching $16,000 ETHZilla amplified the message on X, saying it would “use its strong balance sheet to support shareholders through buybacks, reduce shares available for short borrow, [and] drive up NAV per share” and reiterating that it still holds “~$400 million of ETH” on the balance sheet and carries “no net debt.” The company also cited “recent, concentrated short selling” as a factor keeping the stock under pressure. The market-structure logic is straightforward: when a digital-asset treasury trades below the value of its coin holdings and cash, buying back stock with “coin-cash” can, in theory, collapse the discount and lift NAV per share. But the optics are contentious inside crypto because the mechanism requires selling the underlying asset—here, ETH—to purchase equity, potentially weakening the very treasury backing that investors originally sought. Death Spiral Incoming? Popular crypto trader SalsaTekila (@SalsaTekila) commented on X: “This is extremely bearish, especially if it invites similar behavior. ETH treasuries are not Saylor; they haven’t shown diamond-hand will. If treasury companies start dumping the coin to buy shares, it’s a death spiral setup.” Skeptics also zeroed in on funding choices. “I am mostly curious why the company chose to sell ETH and not use the $569m in cash they had on the balance sheet last month,” another analyst Dan Smith wrote, noting ETHZilla had just said it still holds about $400 million of ETH and thus didn’t deploy it on fresh ETH accumulation. “Why not just use cash?” The question cuts to the core of treasury signaling: using ETH as a liquidity reservoir to defend a discounted equity can be read as rational capital allocation, or as capitulation that undermines the ETH-as-reserve narrative. Beyond the buyback, a retail-driven storyline has rapidly formed around the stock. Business Insider reported that Dimitri Semenikhin—who recently became the face of the Beyond Meat surge—has targeted ETHZilla, saying he purchased roughly 2% of the company at what he views as a 50% discount to modified NAV. He has argued that the market is misreading ETHZilla’s balance sheet because it still reflects legacy biotech results rather than the current digital-asset treasury model. Related Reading: Ethereum Emerges As The Sole Trillion-Dollar Institutional Store Of Value — Here’s Why The same report cites liquid holdings on the order of 102,300 ETH and roughly $560 million in cash, translating to about $62 per share in liquid assets, and calls out a 1-for-10 reverse split on October 15 that, in his view, muddied the optics for retail. Semenikhin flagged November 13 as a potential catalyst if results show the pivot to ETH generating profits. The company’s own messaging emphasizes the discount-to-NAV lens rather than a change in strategy. ETHZilla told investors it would keep buying while the stock trades below asset value and highlighted a goal of shrinking lendable supply to blunt short-selling pressure. For Ethereum markets, the immediate flow effect is limited—$40 million is marginal in ETH’s daily liquidity—but the second-order risk flagged by traders is behavioral contagion. If other ETH-heavy treasuries follow the playbook, selling the underlying to buy their own stock, the flow could become pro-cyclical: coins are sold to close equity discounts, the selling pressures spot, and wider discounts reappear as equity screens rerate to the weaker mark—repeat. That is the “death spiral” scenario skeptics warn about when the treasury asset doubles as the company’s signal of conviction. At press time, ETH traded at $4,156. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
2025/10/29 12:00