TLDR South Korea is considering revisiting its sanctions on North Korea following a new U.S. crackdown. South Korea’s Second Vice Foreign Minister Kim Ji-na emphasized the importance of U.S.-South Korea coordination on digital threats. The U.S. Treasury Department imposed sanctions on North Korean individuals and entities involved in cryptocurrency theft. Sanctions target North Korean groups [...] The post Is South Korea Ready to Revise Its Sanctions on North Korea? appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR South Korea is considering revisiting its sanctions on North Korea following a new U.S. crackdown. South Korea’s Second Vice Foreign Minister Kim Ji-na emphasized the importance of U.S.-South Korea coordination on digital threats. The U.S. Treasury Department imposed sanctions on North Korean individuals and entities involved in cryptocurrency theft. Sanctions target North Korean groups [...] The post Is South Korea Ready to Revise Its Sanctions on North Korea? appeared first on CoinCentral.

Is South Korea Ready to Revise Its Sanctions on North Korea?

2025/11/08 01:06

TLDR

  • South Korea is considering revisiting its sanctions on North Korea following a new U.S. crackdown.
  • South Korea’s Second Vice Foreign Minister Kim Ji-na emphasized the importance of U.S.-South Korea coordination on digital threats.
  • The U.S. Treasury Department imposed sanctions on North Korean individuals and entities involved in cryptocurrency theft.
  • Sanctions target North Korean groups accused of laundering stolen cryptocurrency to fund weapons programs.
  • South Korea and the U.S. continue to focus on managing North Korea’s growing cybercrime activities.

South Korea has signaled a potential review of its sanctions framework on North Korea, following new U.S. actions. The U.S. imposed sanctions on North Korean individuals and entities linked to cybercrime activities, including cryptocurrency theft. This marks the latest development in an ongoing effort to curb Pyongyang’s nuclear and missile programs.

South Korea Open to Reviewing Sanctions Framework

South Korea’s Second Vice Foreign Minister, Kim Ji-na, stated that Seoul could consider revisiting its sanctions. She emphasized that such a decision would depend on the situation. Kim highlighted the need for U.S.-South Korea coordination to address the digital threats posed by North Korea.

Kim also mentioned that cryptocurrency theft by North Korea could potentially fund weapons programs. She explained that North Korean operations like these harm the digital ecosystem. Coordination between South Korea and the U.S. remains crucial in managing these growing digital threats.

U.S. Sanctions Target North Korean Cyber Criminals

The U.S. Treasury Department announced new sanctions targeting several North Korean individuals and entities. These sanctions focus on those accused of laundering stolen cryptocurrency. The sanctioned entities include Korea Mangyongdae Computer Technology Company and DPRK-linked financial representatives in China and Russia.

U.S. officials claim that these groups have moved illicit digital funds to finance North Korea’s weapons programs. Among those sanctioned are U Yong Su, president of KMCTC, and bankers Jang Kuk Chol and Ho Jong Son. The Treasury Department has also imposed sanctions on Ryujong Credit Bank, which reportedly repatriates earnings from North Korean IT workers abroad.

This latest move by the U.S. follows a series of international actions against North Korea’s cybercriminal activities. Ryan Yoon, a senior analyst at Tiger Research in Seoul, noted that small-scale sanctions have been ongoing since North Korea’s 2016 nuclear test. Despite the continued sanctions, the expert points out that their impact may not be substantial.

As pressure mounts on North Korea, both the U.S. and South Korea remain committed to responding to its digital and cyber threats.

The post Is South Korea Ready to Revise Its Sanctions on North Korea? appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

1011 Flash Crash and Stream Default: Unveiling the Root Causes of the Rapidly Deteriorating Sentiment in the Crypto Market

1011 Flash Crash and Stream Default: Unveiling the Root Causes of the Rapidly Deteriorating Sentiment in the Crypto Market

Original title: Why Did Crypto Sentiment Get So Bearish? Original author: Jack Inabinet, Bankless Compiled by: Peggy, BlockBeats Editor's Note: Just four days after Bitcoin hit a record high, the crypto market experienced an unprecedented "10/10 flash crash," with major cryptocurrencies plummeting, numerous altcoins going to zero, and exchanges facing liquidation crises. Simultaneously, highly leveraged funds like Stream Finance collapsed, revealing the fragile nature of "trust me and you're good to go" bubbles. Optimism on social media quickly turned into panic, severely damaging market confidence. This article reviews the ins and outs of this series of events, attempting to answer a key question: Why has the sentiment in the crypto market suddenly become so pessimistic? In the current context of a bursting bubble and a crisis of trust, we may be standing at a new turning point in the cycle. The following is the original text: On Monday, October 6, 2025, Bitcoin hit a new record high, breaking the $126,000 mark for the first time. Whether in the trenches of Crypto Twitter or in the newsroom of CNBC, holders were immersed in an omnipresent "fog of hope". Although the fundamentals did not change much in the month that followed, just four days later on October 10, the crypto market was hit by a crisis – the “10/10 flash crash” is now considered the largest liquidation event in crypto history. In this catastrophic crash, major cryptocurrencies plummeted by more than double digits, many altcoins went to zero, and several exchanges were on the verge of bankruptcy (almost all major perpetual contract platforms triggered automatic liquidation mechanisms because they were unable to pay short positions). Despite the fact that Trump's election was seen as a boon to the crypto industry—from establishing a strategic Bitcoin reserve to appointing regulators who appeared to be pro-crypto—the price of crypto assets has remained sluggish. Aside from a brief surge following Trump's election last November, the ratio of the total market capitalization of cryptocurrencies to the S&P 500 has remained relatively stable for nearly a year. In fact, since Trump's inauguration on January 20, this ratio has even experienced a surprising negative growth. As the market continues to digest the aftermath of the 10/10 liquidation, more and more questions are beginning to surface. Just this Monday, Stream Finance declared bankruptcy. This was a "trust me" crypto income fund managing $200 million, relying on leverage to provide depositors with above-market returns. Its "external fund manager" lost approximately $93 million in assets during operations. While details have not yet been disclosed, Stream is likely the first "Delta-neutral" strategy fund to publicly collapse due to its 10/10 automatic liquidation mechanism. Although its structure had already raised questions, this collapse still caught many lenders off guard—they chose to sacrifice safety for higher returns without clear risk signals. After Stream collapsed, panic quickly spread throughout the DeFi ecosystem, and investors began to collectively withdraw from similar high-risk, high-return strategies. Although the ripple effects of Stream have not yet fully spread, this incident has exposed the risks of the increasingly popular "cyclic stablecoin mining" strategy in DeFi—that is, using existing high-risk deposit certificates to leverage and obtain higher returns. Stream's self-reported losses also reveal the potentially huge losses that Delta-neutral funds may have encountered during the 10/10 automatic position reduction: short hedging was forcibly canceled by the system, and spot long positions instantly went to zero. Although the headlines have shifted, it is certain that the losses on October 10th were catastrophic. Whether operating openly through DeFi or covertly through CeFi, crypto yield funds involve billions of dollars in leverage. Whether the market has sufficient liquidity to cope with potential future liquidations remains to be seen. It's unclear who's "swimming naked," but it's certain that some in the crypto casinos are already out of the loop. If the market falls again, especially after lawsuits alleging centralized exchanges were insolvent during the 10/10 liquidation period, the question won't be "whether something will happen," but rather "whether the entire industry can withstand it."
Share
PANews2025/11/08 07:30
COIN & HOOD drop over 10% – THREE signs crypto market could follow

COIN & HOOD drop over 10% – THREE signs crypto market could follow

The post COIN & HOOD drop over 10% – THREE signs crypto market could follow appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Why are COIN and HOOD dropping sharply? COIN and HOOD are feeling the high-beta impact of a broader risk-off, with selling across exchanges and miners amplifying pressure. Is the market signaling a deeper downturn? BTC’s fragile $100k support, skewed order books, and $144 billion in OI suggest liquidation risk, reflecting fragility rather than confirmed bottoms. The broader risk-off is bleeding into crypto-linked stocks. While pressure is coming from across the market, including miner stocks like Marathon Digital Holdings (NASDAQ: MARA), which fell 7% to a two-month low, at press time, a deeper sell-off is hitting exchange-based crypto stocks. Robinhood (NASDAQ: HOOD) has dropped 11% intraday to $127, a sharper decline than its mid-October crash, which was triggered by crypto volatility and platform slowdowns. Source: TradingView (HOOD/USD) Coinbase (NASDAQ: COIN) mirrored the trend, plunging 15% after the crash to a monthly low of $310. Overall, the sell-off in crypto-related stocks signals a broader market shakeout, with pressure spreading across major trading platforms. In this context, what do COIN’s 7.57% intraday dip, HOOD’s 11% drop, and weakness in other crypto equities indicate? Is the market bracing for another October-style cascade, or is this just a temporary technical blip? COIN, HOOD order books reveal flow imbalance The market’s at a crossroads, with key support levels hanging by a thread.  That said, exchange orderbooks are giving clues. On Coinbase, Bitcoin’s [BTC] bid-depth (+2%) sat at $9 million, while the ask-depth (-2%) towered at $26 million, at press time, signaling that sellers are dominating near-term flows. Against this backdrop, BTC’s $100k level looks extremely vulnerable. As a result, another liquidation cascade can’t be ruled out, with $144 billion in “market-side” Open Interest (OI) at risk of getting squeezed.  Source: Coinglass In short, COIN and HOOD’s intraday dips are echoing this high-beta setup. As…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/11/08 07:28