Many retail traders begin with ICT as a foundation and eventually evolve their own variations. ICT concepts provide structure, but growth as a trader comes from time in the charts, observing, refining, and developing a personal lens. Theory builds awareness, but repetition builds intuition. This framework focuses on GBP/USD, a pair that stands out for its consistent intraday range and respect for mid-timeframe structure. The approach is ICT-inspired, but not strictly ICT. It is reactionary rather than predictive, emphasising confirmation and context over anticipation. The goal isn’t to forecast where GBP/USD will move next, but to build conditions that reveal when the market shows intent. The model is designed for intraday trading. On average, there are one to three valid setups per day, with trades typically lasting between 15 to 45 minutes. The focus is precision, not scale, stacking confluence across timeframes and executing with intent. GBP/USD follows a recurring rhythm through the daily cycle, with each session contributing to the broader narrative of accumulation, manipulation, and distribution.During the Asian session, price typically moves in a contained range, often building short-term liquidity or consolidating near a prior level. This phase acts as accumulation, setting the stage for the London open rather than delivering directional intent. The London session (7 a.m. to 10 a.m. UK time) introduces the manipulation of the day. This is when price frequently sweeps one side of the daily range, for example, a move into a 1H or 4H FVG or rejection block against the higher-timeframe bias, before reversing into alignment with that bias. If the weekly and daily structure are bearish, London may engineer a run on buy-side liquidity to tap into a premium zone before turning lower. Between 10 a.m. and 12 p.m., the market commonly consolidates. This pause in delivery often forms the midpoint of the daily cycle, where liquidity is rebuilt or intermediate highs and lows form.From 12 p.m. to 3 p.m., the New York session tends to deliver the distribution phase, the true expansion that completes the daily move, targeting the opposite end of the range established earlier in the day Market structure is analysed top-down. The weekly provides directional bias, the daily defines the active range, and the 4-hour and 1-hour charts refine potential trade zones. The 15-minute chart serves as confirmation, while the 1 or 3-minute chart is used for execution. The DXY acts as a macro directional filter, providing context rather than trade signals. Clear strength or weakness in the dollar refines expectations for GBP/USD delivery. All key levels, weekly rejection blocks, fair value gaps, and liquidity zones, are transposed down through each timeframe. Weekly levels inform daily ranges, daily levels refine 4-hour and 1-hour zones, and those are projected onto 15-minute and 1/3-minute charts for confirmation and execution.This top-down approach ensures consistency across timeframes. Entries on the 1/3-minute chart are never arbitrary; they reflect the same structural points identified at higher timeframes, preserving alignment with broader market bias while capturing intraday reaction opportunities. The process begins on the weekly chart to determine directional bias. When determining bias on the weekly chart, the focus is not just on structure but on expansion. A meaningful directional read comes when price has clearly moved in one direction, creating a decisive range shift. Subtle wicks or small retracements are not considered sufficient evidence. The market must show intent, a real expansion that signals where liquidity is being drawn. The goal is to identify the draw on liquidity, where price is likely being pulled. Key reference points include fair value gaps (FVGs), rejection blocks, and major wicks. For instance, if a previous weekly candle manipulated above a large wick and closed bearish, while clear FVGs remain below, bias would lean toward the downside, targeting the nearest weekly rejection block or liquidity pool. This top-down bias sets the directional context for the week’s trades. Once the weekly direction is clear, the daily chart defines the operating range. Prior day’s highs and lows serve as liquidity targets, while daily FVGs highlight retracement zones.If weekly bias is bearish, the focus shifts to identifying where daily price may retrace before continuing lower ,such as the prior day’s FVG or the body of a bearish daily rejection block. The daily low becomes the initial target of interest for intraday trades. The 4-hour and 1-hour charts refine precision. These timeframes are used to mark key FVGs and rejection blocks that price may react to intraday. Each FVG is split into two important zones ,the “tap-in” level (where price may react early) and the “fill” level (where the imbalance is fully mitigated).A bearish scenario, for example, might involve price tapping into the bottom of a 4-hour bearish FVG before reversing, without necessarily filling the entire imbalance. Breaker blocks are not required in this model, as lower-timeframe breakers often coincide with higher-timeframe FVGs. The 15-minute chart provides confirmation. When price reaches a 1H or 4H level of interest, a bearish bias would require a 15-minute down-close candle at that zone to confirm rejection. Execution occurs on the 1/3-minute chart. Entry is taken after a clear break of structure (BOS) from the left side of the chart, meaning a previous short-term low is broken within the active leg, not in future price action. Breaks of structure should be significant shifts, not minor wobbles. The goal is to enter when price demonstrates real commitment, like an “elephant stepping into water” — large, deliberate, and unambiguous. Entries are triggered after this kind of break of structure and then confirmed with FVG interaction. Manipulative or minor moves are ignored, because the model prioritises reaction to meaningful expansion rather than reacting to noise.The first FVG formed after that BOS becomes the entry zone. A stop-loss is placed above the most recent 1/3-minute swing high, and targets are set at the nearest liquidity pool, typically the next 1H or 4H level. Trades are not taken if price has already reached another higher-timeframe level of interest, as reaction probability diminishes after multiple mitigations. The DXY (U.S. Dollar Index) acts as a directional filter. Ideally, it confirms the move with an opposite 1/3-minute BOS, though perfect correlation is not required. EUR/USD structure often supports the same directional logic. Risk is capped at 1% to 2% per trade, with a focus on precision and discipline rather than volume. Average risk-to-reward sits between 1:1 and 1:2, prioritising accuracy and consistent delivery over extended targets.No trades are taken 15 minutes before or after major GBP or USD news releases. This framework treats the market as a constantly shifting delivery mechanism rather than a predictable system. It adapts to what the price is showing, not what it should do. Liquidity and displacement reveal intent; the trader’s role is to recognise that intent across timeframes and act only when structure confirms it. The objective is alignment, not prediction, stacking confluence, respecting context, and executing when the market validates its own narrative. GBP/USD Intraday Strategy: A Reactionary Model Built from ICT Concepts was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this storyMany retail traders begin with ICT as a foundation and eventually evolve their own variations. ICT concepts provide structure, but growth as a trader comes from time in the charts, observing, refining, and developing a personal lens. Theory builds awareness, but repetition builds intuition. This framework focuses on GBP/USD, a pair that stands out for its consistent intraday range and respect for mid-timeframe structure. The approach is ICT-inspired, but not strictly ICT. It is reactionary rather than predictive, emphasising confirmation and context over anticipation. The goal isn’t to forecast where GBP/USD will move next, but to build conditions that reveal when the market shows intent. The model is designed for intraday trading. On average, there are one to three valid setups per day, with trades typically lasting between 15 to 45 minutes. The focus is precision, not scale, stacking confluence across timeframes and executing with intent. GBP/USD follows a recurring rhythm through the daily cycle, with each session contributing to the broader narrative of accumulation, manipulation, and distribution.During the Asian session, price typically moves in a contained range, often building short-term liquidity or consolidating near a prior level. This phase acts as accumulation, setting the stage for the London open rather than delivering directional intent. The London session (7 a.m. to 10 a.m. UK time) introduces the manipulation of the day. This is when price frequently sweeps one side of the daily range, for example, a move into a 1H or 4H FVG or rejection block against the higher-timeframe bias, before reversing into alignment with that bias. If the weekly and daily structure are bearish, London may engineer a run on buy-side liquidity to tap into a premium zone before turning lower. Between 10 a.m. and 12 p.m., the market commonly consolidates. This pause in delivery often forms the midpoint of the daily cycle, where liquidity is rebuilt or intermediate highs and lows form.From 12 p.m. to 3 p.m., the New York session tends to deliver the distribution phase, the true expansion that completes the daily move, targeting the opposite end of the range established earlier in the day Market structure is analysed top-down. The weekly provides directional bias, the daily defines the active range, and the 4-hour and 1-hour charts refine potential trade zones. The 15-minute chart serves as confirmation, while the 1 or 3-minute chart is used for execution. The DXY acts as a macro directional filter, providing context rather than trade signals. Clear strength or weakness in the dollar refines expectations for GBP/USD delivery. All key levels, weekly rejection blocks, fair value gaps, and liquidity zones, are transposed down through each timeframe. Weekly levels inform daily ranges, daily levels refine 4-hour and 1-hour zones, and those are projected onto 15-minute and 1/3-minute charts for confirmation and execution.This top-down approach ensures consistency across timeframes. Entries on the 1/3-minute chart are never arbitrary; they reflect the same structural points identified at higher timeframes, preserving alignment with broader market bias while capturing intraday reaction opportunities. The process begins on the weekly chart to determine directional bias. When determining bias on the weekly chart, the focus is not just on structure but on expansion. A meaningful directional read comes when price has clearly moved in one direction, creating a decisive range shift. Subtle wicks or small retracements are not considered sufficient evidence. The market must show intent, a real expansion that signals where liquidity is being drawn. The goal is to identify the draw on liquidity, where price is likely being pulled. Key reference points include fair value gaps (FVGs), rejection blocks, and major wicks. For instance, if a previous weekly candle manipulated above a large wick and closed bearish, while clear FVGs remain below, bias would lean toward the downside, targeting the nearest weekly rejection block or liquidity pool. This top-down bias sets the directional context for the week’s trades. Once the weekly direction is clear, the daily chart defines the operating range. Prior day’s highs and lows serve as liquidity targets, while daily FVGs highlight retracement zones.If weekly bias is bearish, the focus shifts to identifying where daily price may retrace before continuing lower ,such as the prior day’s FVG or the body of a bearish daily rejection block. The daily low becomes the initial target of interest for intraday trades. The 4-hour and 1-hour charts refine precision. These timeframes are used to mark key FVGs and rejection blocks that price may react to intraday. Each FVG is split into two important zones ,the “tap-in” level (where price may react early) and the “fill” level (where the imbalance is fully mitigated).A bearish scenario, for example, might involve price tapping into the bottom of a 4-hour bearish FVG before reversing, without necessarily filling the entire imbalance. Breaker blocks are not required in this model, as lower-timeframe breakers often coincide with higher-timeframe FVGs. The 15-minute chart provides confirmation. When price reaches a 1H or 4H level of interest, a bearish bias would require a 15-minute down-close candle at that zone to confirm rejection. Execution occurs on the 1/3-minute chart. Entry is taken after a clear break of structure (BOS) from the left side of the chart, meaning a previous short-term low is broken within the active leg, not in future price action. Breaks of structure should be significant shifts, not minor wobbles. The goal is to enter when price demonstrates real commitment, like an “elephant stepping into water” — large, deliberate, and unambiguous. Entries are triggered after this kind of break of structure and then confirmed with FVG interaction. Manipulative or minor moves are ignored, because the model prioritises reaction to meaningful expansion rather than reacting to noise.The first FVG formed after that BOS becomes the entry zone. A stop-loss is placed above the most recent 1/3-minute swing high, and targets are set at the nearest liquidity pool, typically the next 1H or 4H level. Trades are not taken if price has already reached another higher-timeframe level of interest, as reaction probability diminishes after multiple mitigations. The DXY (U.S. Dollar Index) acts as a directional filter. Ideally, it confirms the move with an opposite 1/3-minute BOS, though perfect correlation is not required. EUR/USD structure often supports the same directional logic. Risk is capped at 1% to 2% per trade, with a focus on precision and discipline rather than volume. Average risk-to-reward sits between 1:1 and 1:2, prioritising accuracy and consistent delivery over extended targets.No trades are taken 15 minutes before or after major GBP or USD news releases. This framework treats the market as a constantly shifting delivery mechanism rather than a predictable system. It adapts to what the price is showing, not what it should do. Liquidity and displacement reveal intent; the trader’s role is to recognise that intent across timeframes and act only when structure confirms it. The objective is alignment, not prediction, stacking confluence, respecting context, and executing when the market validates its own narrative. GBP/USD Intraday Strategy: A Reactionary Model Built from ICT Concepts was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story

GBP/USD Intraday Strategy: A Reactionary Model Built from ICT Concepts

2025/10/23 17:45

Many retail traders begin with ICT as a foundation and eventually evolve their own variations. ICT concepts provide structure, but growth as a trader comes from time in the charts, observing, refining, and developing a personal lens. Theory builds awareness, but repetition builds intuition.

This framework focuses on GBP/USD, a pair that stands out for its consistent intraday range and respect for mid-timeframe structure. The approach is ICT-inspired, but not strictly ICT. It is reactionary rather than predictive, emphasising confirmation and context over anticipation. The goal isn’t to forecast where GBP/USD will move next, but to build conditions that reveal when the market shows intent.

The model is designed for intraday trading. On average, there are one to three valid setups per day, with trades typically lasting between 15 to 45 minutes. The focus is precision, not scale, stacking confluence across timeframes and executing with intent.

GBP/USD follows a recurring rhythm through the daily cycle, with each session contributing to the broader narrative of accumulation, manipulation, and distribution.During the Asian session, price typically moves in a contained range, often building short-term liquidity or consolidating near a prior level. This phase acts as accumulation, setting the stage for the London open rather than delivering directional intent.

The London session (7 a.m. to 10 a.m. UK time) introduces the manipulation of the day. This is when price frequently sweeps one side of the daily range, for example, a move into a 1H or 4H FVG or rejection block against the higher-timeframe bias, before reversing into alignment with that bias. If the weekly and daily structure are bearish, London may engineer a run on buy-side liquidity to tap into a premium zone before turning lower.

Between 10 a.m. and 12 p.m., the market commonly consolidates. This pause in delivery often forms the midpoint of the daily cycle, where liquidity is rebuilt or intermediate highs and lows form.From 12 p.m. to 3 p.m., the New York session tends to deliver the distribution phase, the true expansion that completes the daily move, targeting the opposite end of the range established earlier in the day

Market structure is analysed top-down. The weekly provides directional bias, the daily defines the active range, and the 4-hour and 1-hour charts refine potential trade zones. The 15-minute chart serves as confirmation, while the 1 or 3-minute chart is used for execution. The DXY acts as a macro directional filter, providing context rather than trade signals. Clear strength or weakness in the dollar refines expectations for GBP/USD delivery.

All key levels, weekly rejection blocks, fair value gaps, and liquidity zones, are transposed down through each timeframe. Weekly levels inform daily ranges, daily levels refine 4-hour and 1-hour zones, and those are projected onto 15-minute and 1/3-minute charts for confirmation and execution.This top-down approach ensures consistency across timeframes. Entries on the 1/3-minute chart are never arbitrary; they reflect the same structural points identified at higher timeframes, preserving alignment with broader market bias while capturing intraday reaction opportunities.

The process begins on the weekly chart to determine directional bias. When determining bias on the weekly chart, the focus is not just on structure but on expansion. A meaningful directional read comes when price has clearly moved in one direction, creating a decisive range shift. Subtle wicks or small retracements are not considered sufficient evidence. The market must show intent, a real expansion that signals where liquidity is being drawn.

The goal is to identify the draw on liquidity, where price is likely being pulled. Key reference points include fair value gaps (FVGs), rejection blocks, and major wicks. For instance, if a previous weekly candle manipulated above a large wick and closed bearish, while clear FVGs remain below, bias would lean toward the downside, targeting the nearest weekly rejection block or liquidity pool. This top-down bias sets the directional context for the week’s trades.

Once the weekly direction is clear, the daily chart defines the operating range. Prior day’s highs and lows serve as liquidity targets, while daily FVGs highlight retracement zones.If weekly bias is bearish, the focus shifts to identifying where daily price may retrace before continuing lower ,such as the prior day’s FVG or the body of a bearish daily rejection block. The daily low becomes the initial target of interest for intraday trades.

The 4-hour and 1-hour charts refine precision. These timeframes are used to mark key FVGs and rejection blocks that price may react to intraday. Each FVG is split into two important zones ,the “tap-in” level (where price may react early) and the “fill” level (where the imbalance is fully mitigated).A bearish scenario, for example, might involve price tapping into the bottom of a 4-hour bearish FVG before reversing, without necessarily filling the entire imbalance. Breaker blocks are not required in this model, as lower-timeframe breakers often coincide with higher-timeframe FVGs.

The 15-minute chart provides confirmation. When price reaches a 1H or 4H level of interest, a bearish bias would require a 15-minute down-close candle at that zone to confirm rejection. Execution occurs on the 1/3-minute chart. Entry is taken after a clear break of structure (BOS) from the left side of the chart, meaning a previous short-term low is broken within the active leg, not in future price action. Breaks of structure should be significant shifts, not minor wobbles. The goal is to enter when price demonstrates real commitment, like an “elephant stepping into water” — large, deliberate, and unambiguous. Entries are triggered after this kind of break of structure and then confirmed with FVG interaction. Manipulative or minor moves are ignored, because the model prioritises reaction to meaningful expansion rather than reacting to noise.The first FVG formed after that BOS becomes the entry zone. A stop-loss is placed above the most recent 1/3-minute swing high, and targets are set at the nearest liquidity pool, typically the next 1H or 4H level. Trades are not taken if price has already reached another higher-timeframe level of interest, as reaction probability diminishes after multiple mitigations.

The DXY (U.S. Dollar Index) acts as a directional filter. Ideally, it confirms the move with an opposite 1/3-minute BOS, though perfect correlation is not required. EUR/USD structure often supports the same directional logic. Risk is capped at 1% to 2% per trade, with a focus on precision and discipline rather than volume. Average risk-to-reward sits between 1:1 and 1:2, prioritising accuracy and consistent delivery over extended targets.No trades are taken 15 minutes before or after major GBP or USD news releases.

This framework treats the market as a constantly shifting delivery mechanism rather than a predictable system. It adapts to what the price is showing, not what it should do. Liquidity and displacement reveal intent; the trader’s role is to recognise that intent across timeframes and act only when structure confirms it. The objective is alignment, not prediction, stacking confluence, respecting context, and executing when the market validates its own narrative.


GBP/USD Intraday Strategy: A Reactionary Model Built from ICT Concepts was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

‘Code Is Law’ documentary nails the drama of DeFi hacks — despite what it leaves out

‘Code Is Law’ documentary nails the drama of DeFi hacks — despite what it leaves out

Ekin Genç is DL News’ Editor-in-Chief. Opinions expressed are his own.The world was transfixed last week when thieves in construction vests at the Louvre managed to vanish with jewels worth more than $100 million. Yet when hundreds of millions vanish from decentralised finance, nobody outside crypto hears about it; you won’t see headlines of DeFi heists in mainstream media. (The Louvre heist is hefty, of course, but it still wouldn’t make it to the top 25 in crypto.)That dissonance is the starting point of Code Is Law, a new documentary about DeFi exploits:“It’s incredible, you turn on the news and see a $450 theft from a local 7-Eleven, and on the same day someone steals $25 million from a protocol and you’ll never hear about it,” pseudonymous blockchain security specialist Ogle says during the opening credits.Streaming on Amazon Prime Video, Code Is Law is probably the first serious documentary to take the woes of decentralised finance — not centralised crypto exchanges or charismatic crypto fraudsters — as its subject.“It’s done an incredible job of representing people involved as humans rather than fringe lunatics, and I’m proud I was involved in it,” Indexed Finance co-founder Laurence Day told DL News, “even if I now know more about how the sausage is made when it comes to films than I ever cared to!”Given it’s a documentary about a community that’s pretty much exclusively online, you might expect it to be un-cinematic, a story more suited to the podcast format. It does, of course, consist mostly of people explaining things, sitting in front of laptops, typing, skimming code, and wading through Discord logs. Yet the filmmakers have still managed to make the watch genuinely gripping — not just for crypto nerds, but for anyone interested in cybercrime.But those deeply involved in crypto will notice at least two major omissions — for good reasons, as one of the directors tells me.The DAO hack without the hackerYou’ll be familiar with DAOs as the digital co-ops behind DeFi protocols and other crypto projects. But back at Ethereum’s start, there was basically one DAO, and it was literally called The DAO. It functioned like a giant onchain venture fund.The documentary opens with the hack of that project in 2016. Griff Green, Christoph Jentzsch, and Lefteris Karapetsas narrate those sleepless days as they tried to keep the first Ethereum experiment from falling apart in real time. Their recollections give the film its pulse. Code is Law is one of the first accounts in which the people who held Ethereum together tell their story at such length, and for that reason alone, the documentary is a significant contribution to crypto industry’s collective memory.The DAO hack was a big deal for Ethereum because the saga led to a “hard fork” — a blockchain split — to refund depositors who lost their money in the hack. Those who disagreed with the hard-fork kept mining the original chain, which became Ethereum Classic. The other, newer version is what we call Ethereum today. But that monumental event, a consequence of the DAO hack, gets only the briefest mention in Code is Law — and in the closing credits, at that. “In a film with such a wide scope, we had to make difficult choices about what to include,” James Craig, one of the directors, told DL News. Louis Giles is the other director.Another glaring omission is the journalist Laura Shin’s 2022 investigation identifying Austrian programmer Toby Hoenisch as The DAO hacker. (Hoenisch denies the allegations.)“In the case of Hoenisch, the decision was primarily thematic: our film focuses on individuals who actively defended their actions by invoking the idea that ‘code is law.’,” Craig said. “Since Hoenisch has never admitted to the hack — let alone offered a justification based on that idea — including him would have felt tangential to the story we were telling.”For anyone hoping for closure on the DAO hack story, that omission might feel like a letdown. Yet the documentary succeeds where it matters most: capturing the chaos and urgency of those first days of The DAO hack, from the people who were directly involved with it.Andean Medjedovic, the poster boy of ‘code is law’The hacker who gets the most airtime in the documentary is Andean Medjedovic, a Canadian teenager who ended up being a kind of live experiment in whether “code is law” holds up in a court of law. His name is tied to two major DeFi exploits, that of Indexed Finance in 2021 and of KyberSwap in 2023. According to an indictment by prosecutors in the Eastern District of New York, he stole about $49 million and $16 million, respectively.“It’s both cathartic to see it out after all this time, and a reminder of an incredibly rough time in a bunch of our lives, so I’m pretty conflicted,” Day told DL News.As the documentary reminds us, Medjedovic, a maths prodigy, was identified by the Indexed Finance team through a seemingly absurd digital breadcrumb. In a careless moment of vanity, he edited — under a user name associated with him — a Wikipedia page for a Canadian TV show he’d once appeared on and added himself to the list of show’s notable alumni as a “notable mathematician.” That tiny edit was enough to connect the dots between his real identity and the heist. But that wasn’t enough to bring him to justice, as Medjedovic still remains at large. In March 2024, Medjedovic told DL News he was self-exiled on an island somewhere and claimed to have turned a white-hat hacker — someone who hacks lawfully.Medjedovic declined to speak in the documentary, Craig told DL News.Didn’t Avi Eisenberg prove ‘code is law’?Another hacker that gets plenty of screen time is Avi Eisenberg, the Mango Markets exploiter.In October 2022, Eisenberg manipulated Mango Markets, the Solana-based decentralised exchange, by artificially inflating the price of his own collateral token, then borrowing against it to drain roughly $110 million in assets. He was convicted in April 2024.Unlike most hackers who vanish, he went fully public at the time, tweeting that his actions were “a highly profitable trading strategy” conducted entirely within the protocol’s rules (hence “code is law”).Although initially he negotiated with the Mango DAO, returning part of the funds in exchange for a promise that he wouldn’t face legal consequences, that didn’t stop US federal agencies from later charging him with market manipulation and fraud. If you don’t know what later happened, you could be forgiven for thinking as the credits roll that Eisenberg lost the “code is law” defence. “We’re beginning to see the end of the ‘code is law’ defence,” Paul Dylan-Ennis, the author of ​​the book “Absolute Essentials of Ethereum”, says in the documentary.“Filming concluded during the build-up to Eisenberg’s trial, and at the time, the overwhelming expectation among those we spoke to was that he would be found guilty,” Craig said.“The crew had originally intended to end the film with a message saying that Eisenberg’s case had tested the ‘“code is law’” defence in court, and it flopped.”And yet this May a judge said prosecutors didn’t prove Eisenberg defrauded Mango Markets in 2022.Although some in the industry cheered that “code is law” appeared to prevail in court, things were more nuanced than that — as they typically are.While the defence did lean on the idea that Eisenberg’s trades were executed within the logic of the protocol’s code, the judge didn’t conclude that this alone justified acquittal.Instead, the judge’s decision to overturn the most serious conviction — on wire fraud — rested on narrower legal grounds specific to that statute.“While a jury did initially find Eisenberg guilty, as we were preparing to release the film it became clear the judge was seriously considering overturning some of the convictions… which ultimately happened,” Craig said.“The precedent it sets for future cases isn’t clear, but it reinforces the central theme of the film: that we’re in uncharted legal territory where traditional systems are struggling to keep up.”
Share
2025/10/29 07:11