Attorney claims the XRP Army influenced Judge Torres' decision on the lawsuit against Ripple

2025/09/04 13:23

XRP tokenholders played a crucial role in helping Ripple Labs secure a victory against the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), a case that officially concluded last month when both parties agreed to dismiss their appeals.

The SEC filed a lawsuit against Ripple in 2020, alleging that the company sold XRP tokens as unregistered securities. In July 2023, in the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s lawsuit against Ripple, Judge Analisa Torres determined that XRP is not inherently a security, and the case was fully resolved in August of this year.

Deaton explained on X that, despite more than 2,000 exhibits being submitted, Judge Torres cited just a few dozen, including the XRP Holder Affidavits, his amicus brief, and oral arguments from the LBRY case. He remarked, “No credible person can argue that the XRP Army didn’t make a difference in the Ripple case. If they do, they’re either ignorant of the facts and truth or intentionally lying.”

Deaton is recognized for championing the rights of crypto investors, particularly XRP holders, whom he contended were underrepresented in the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple.

Deaton argues that even one person can change a situation’s outcome

Deaton noted that the court’s acknowledgment of XRP holder affidavits and his brief validated the role of community voices in the legal process. He stated that without those citations, some might have questioned whether their efforts had any real impact. Still, the ruling itself proved otherwise, showing that the XRP Army’s activism genuinely influenced the court’s reasoning.

His observations point to the growing belief that collective action can meaningfully impact the course of major crypto litigation. The lawyer even affirmed, “Often, people say one person can’t make a difference. I say: one person can inspire many people and together, they can make a difference.”

Some X community members agreed with Deaton that the XRP Army helped influence the judge’s decision. One user noted that there’s real influence when a large group engages through open forums. Another insisted that the XRP Army had left its mark on history, with the courtroom resounding with the power of a united community.

And with the US Appeals Court approving a joint move to dismiss appeals last month, the Ripple-SEC case is effectively closed.

Ripple’s McCrimmon explained that the firm is working to enhance payments and transactions

On the What’s at Stake podcast, Ripple’s Vice President and Deputy General Counsel Deborah McCrimmon also shared insights into the company’s mission and its battle with the SEC. 

McCrimmon explained that Ripple is working toward an “internet of value,” seeking to make moving money globally easy and inexpensive. The XRP Ledger enables those near-instant, low-cost payments. She also said that the  SEC case against Ripple became a collaborative effort, with the XRP community helping surface key SEC materials that strengthened Ripple’s fair notice case. Moreover, Deaton noted that retail investors’ consistent advocacy played a crucial role in helping Ripple weather the lawsuit, a factor many believe positions XRP to surpass Ethereum’s performance.

Long before the lawsuit, many in the crypto world dismissed XRP and used “XRP Army” as a jab at its most loyal holders. However, the SEC case turned that label into a badge of honor, rallying the community together.

XRPs price spiked 72% after Judge Torres issued a mixed ruling, determining that the token sold on public exchanges was not inherently a security back in 2023, rising from $0.47 to $0.81, according to CoinGecko.

Today, Ripple continues to grow the real-world utility of its token, deploying solutions for lightning-fast cross-border payments and greater access to financial services.

Ahead of the SEC and Ripple dropping their appeals, effectively winding down the court case, the token surged in trading once more on speculation and reached a high of $3.35 before retreating. At press time, XRP is exchanging hands at $2.85 a token, and is down about 4% in the past 24 hours after reaching a new all-time high of $3.65 back in July

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

AI and Writing on Medium: A Mix of Possibilities and Worries

AI and Writing on Medium: A Mix of Possibilities and Worries

This document explores the diverse perspectives of writers on the Medium platform regarding the integration and impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in their creative process and the broader writing landscape. It delves into the opportunities AI presents for enhancing productivity, generating ideas, and improving writing quality, while also addressing the anxieties surrounding originality, job security, and the potential devaluation of human creativity.Photo by BoliviaInteligente on Unsplash The Allure of AI: Efficiency and Inspiration Many Medium writers acknowledge the potential benefits of AI tools, particularly in areas where efficiency and inspiration are paramount. Boosting Productivity: AI-powered writing assistants can significantly speed up the writing process. Tools like Grammarly and ProWritingAid, which have been around for a while, are now being augmented with AI features that offer more sophisticated grammar and style suggestions. AI can also assist with tasks such as: Generating outlines: Quickly creating structured outlines for articles, saving time on initial planning Research and summarization: Efficiently gathering information and summarizing lengthy documents, allowing writers to focus on analysis and interpretation. Drafting initial content: Producing initial drafts of sections or entire articles, providing a starting point for writers to refine and personalize. Sparking Creativity: AI can serve as a source of inspiration and help writers overcome writer’s block. Generating ideas: AI tools can suggest potential topics, angles, and keywords based on trending themes and audience interests. Exploring different writing styles: Experimenting with AI to generate content in various tones and styles, broadening a writer’s creative range. Overcoming writer’s block: Using AI to generate initial text or prompts to jumpstart the writing process when facing creative stagnation. Improving Writing Quality: AI tools can help writers refine their work and ensure clarity and accuracy. Grammar and style checking: Identifying and correcting grammatical errors, stylistic inconsistencies, and awkward phrasing. Readability analysis: Assessing the readability of text and suggesting improvements to make it more accessible to a wider audience. SEO optimization: Optimizing content for search engines by suggesting relevant keywords and improving overall SEO performance. The Shadow of AI: Concerns and Ethical Considerations Despite the potential benefits, many Medium writers express concerns about the ethical implications and potential negative consequences of AI in writing. Originality and Authenticity: A primary concern is the potential for AI to diminish originality and authenticity in writing. Content mills and plagiarism: The fear that AI will be used to generate low-quality, generic content that floods the internet and potentially infringes on copyright. Loss of unique voice: The concern that relying too heavily on AI will lead to a homogenization of writing styles and a loss of individual voice. Defining authorship: Questions arise about who is the true author of AI-generated content — the user who prompts the AI or the AI itself? Job Security and the Value of Human Writers: Many writers worry about the potential for AI to displace human writers and devalue their skills. Automation of writing tasks: The fear that AI will automate many of the tasks currently performed by writers, leading to job losses. Lowering rates for writing services: The concern that the availability of AI-generated content will drive down rates for human writers, making it difficult to earn a living. The evolving role of the writer: The need for writers to adapt their skills and focus on areas where human creativity and expertise are essential, such as critical thinking, emotional intelligence, and storytelling. Ethical Considerations: The use of AI in writing raises several ethical questions. Transparency and disclosure: The importance of being transparent about the use of AI in content creation and disclosing when AI has been used to generate or assist with writing. Bias and fairness: The potential for AI algorithms to perpetuate biases and stereotypes, leading to unfair or discriminatory content. Misinformation and manipulation: The risk that AI will be used to generate and spread misinformation or manipulate public opinion. Navigating the Future: A Balanced Approach The consensus among many Medium writers is that AI is a tool that should be used responsibly and ethically. A balanced approach is needed, one that leverages the benefits of AI while mitigating the risks. Embrace AI as a Tool, Not a Replacement: View AI as a tool to enhance writing skills and productivity, rather than a replacement for human creativity and expertise. Focus on Human Strengths: Emphasize the unique qualities that human writers bring to the table, such as critical thinking, emotional intelligence, storytelling, and the ability to connect with audiences on a personal level. Develop New Skills: Acquire new skills in areas such as AI prompt engineering, content strategy, and data analysis to remain competitive in the evolving writing landscape. Advocate for Ethical Guidelines: Support the development of ethical guidelines and best practices for the use of AI in writing, promoting transparency, fairness, and accountability. Foster a Community of Learning: Engage in discussions and share knowledge about AI tools and their impact on the writing profession, fostering a community of learning and collaboration. In conclusion, the Medium writing community holds a complex and nuanced view of AI tools. While recognizing the potential for increased efficiency and creative inspiration, writers also express legitimate concerns about originality, job security, and ethical considerations. The key to navigating this evolving landscape lies in embracing AI as a tool, focusing on human strengths, developing new skills, and advocating for ethical guidelines. By adopting a balanced and responsible approach, writers can harness the power of AI to enhance their craft while preserving the value of human creativity and storytelling. AI and Writing on Medium: A Mix of Possibilities and Worries was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/04 15:06
Share