Ukraine, green light for 23% on crypto: the Rada approves the draft in the first reading. All the details in the article.Ukraine, green light for 23% on crypto: the Rada approves the draft in the first reading. All the details in the article.

Ukraine, green light for 23% on crypto: the Rada approves the draft in first reading

Kyiv, September 3, 2025 — Strong signal from the Ukrainian Parliament: in first reading the Verkhovna Rada has approved a bill that provides for a levy of up to 23% on profits from digital assets, combining an income tax of 18% and an additional 5% allocated to military costs, as reported by Verkhovna Rada.

According to data collected by our desk and parliamentary records, the vote in the first reading took place on September 3, 2025, and recorded 246 votes in favor.

Industry analysts observe that the combination of an 18% income tax and a 5% military tax seems designed to increase revenue allocated to defense while still allowing room for technical regulation in the second reading.

In cross-checks with official communications from the Rada and notes from the National Bank of Ukraine, the text is still subject to operational amendments before final approval.

In brief: rates, votes, and what changes immediately

  • Base rate: income tax at 18% applied to cryptocurrency gains.
  • Additional withdrawal: 5% military tax (bringing the potential withdrawal to 23%), as reported by official sources.
  • Transitional facilitation: 5% on fiat conversions in the first year from the effective date, to support the regularization and emergence of capital.
  • Initial exemptions: the draft includes favorable regimes for crypto-to-crypto exchanges and for stablecoins, to be confirmed in the subsequent legislative phase.
  • Vote: a vote of 246 yes is recorded in first reading.
  • Status of the process: the text remains editable before the second reading.

How the Withdrawal Would Work: Operational Rules

In the current framework, the profits generated from the sale or conversion of digital assets are taxable. The combination of income tax (18%) and military tax (5%) results in a potential levy of 23% on gains.

It should be noted that the draft also introduces a reduced rate of 5% for conversions into fiat currency in the first year, with the aim of encouraging the regularization and emergence of capital.

Practical Example

  • Standard scenario: capital gain of 10,000 UAH → tax 18% (1,800 UAH) + military tax 5% (500 UAH) = 2,300 UAH total. Net: 7,700 UAH.
  • Transitional scenario (conversion to fiat in the first year, if confirmed): rate of 5% on 10,000 UAH = 500 UAH. Net: 9,500 UAH.

From an operational standpoint, the treatment of crypto-to-crypto transactions and stablecoins remains to be clarified: the draft suggests exemptions or preferential regimes, however, the text may be amended before final approval.

Who oversees the market: NBU or Market Authority

The dossier on the regulator remains open. The choice between the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) and the National Securities and Stock Market Commission will impact supervision, licenses, and compliance procedures for operators.

  • If the NBU prevails, the focus will be on financial stability, payments, and anti-money laundering measures.
  • If the delegation goes to the Commission, the focus will be on investor protection, market transparency, and combating abuses.

Indeed, the definition of the supervisory perimeter will be decisive for the exchange and for the service providers active in the country.

Impact on Investors and Businesses: Balancing Revenue and Competitiveness

The stated goal is to combine tax certainty and attractiveness. A clear regulatory framework can support domestic operations and encourage the repatriation of capital; on the contrary, high tax rates weigh on net returns and could direct part of the activity towards jurisdictions with lighter tax regimes.

  • Strengths: more predictable rules, boost to compliance, and incentive for the emergence of capital.
  • Critical Issues: potential capital flight and reduced competitiveness compared to regional hubs with more favorable tax regimes.

That said, context matters: according to the 2025 Chainalysis index, Ukraine ranks among the countries with high adoption of digital assets, in eighth position globally. The new tax framework will need to balance control and competitiveness.

Where to Consult Sources and Documents

The text approved in first reading is identified as the bill on the taxation of virtual assets and is available on the Verkhovna Rada portal.

For regulatory updates, it is useful to consult the official pages of the NBU and the NSSMC. Technical details – bill number, consolidated text, and legislative schedule – will follow with the second reading and the subsequent publication of parliamentary acts.

FAQ

Who falls within the tax perimeter?

Individuals who realize capital gains through the sale or conversion of digital assets into fiat currency or other fiscally relevant instruments.

Are crypto-to-crypto exchanges and stablecoins taxed?

The draft provides for temporary exemptions or preferential regimes for such transactions, although the regulation may be revised before final approval.

When will it come into effect?

The measure is in the legislative process: its entry into force will depend on the outcome of the second reading, any amendments, and the official publication.

Next Steps

In the coming months, the second reading in the chamber, the definition of the regulator, and the drafting of the implementing decrees are expected. Three key issues remain central: calibration of the tax rates, scope of the exemptions, and governance of the supervision.

The evolution of the text will be crucial for the digital strategy and for the tax collection of the Ukrainian state.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
Silver Price Crash Is Over “For Real This Time,” Analyst Predicts a Surge Back Above $90

Silver Price Crash Is Over “For Real This Time,” Analyst Predicts a Surge Back Above $90

Silver has been taking a beating lately, and the Silver price hasn’t exactly been acting like a safe haven. After running up into the highs, the whole move reversed
Share
Captainaltcoin2026/02/07 03:15