The post Venus Protocol Recovers Stolen Funds but Raises Another Risk appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insights: Venus Protocol clawed back $13.5 million after a whale was hacked, using forced liquidation. Recovery showed funds could be saved, but also revealed that Venus can directly intervene. Debate grows: Is Venus Protocol truly decentralized if it can pause and take control? Venus Protocol, a lending platform on BNB Chain, has brought back stolen funds. A whale lost about $13.5 million on Sept 2, 2025, in a phishing attack. Services were paused right after to stop more damage. Now, Venus has stated all services are back online. The lost funds were taken back through a special process called force liquidation. This means the hacker’s loans were closed, and the tokens locked as safety measures were seized. The recovery helped save the whale, but it also raised a new question about how much control Venus has over user funds. How the Venus Protocol Recovery Worked? The crypto hack yesterday did not break Venus Protocol’s smart contracts. Instead, the hacker tricked the whale’s wallet setup. The attacker replaced one normal action with another hidden action. That gave them power over the whale’s funds. Venus Protocol used force liquidation to undo the damage. In simple words, when users borrow on Venus, they must lock tokens as security. If they fail to pay, or if something goes wrong, those tokens can be sold or seized. Venus Protocol Announces Resumption Of Services | Source: X That is what happened to the hacker. Venus closed their loan, sold the safety tokens, and got back the stolen funds. On-chain data shows the Venus Liquidator address received more than $325,000 in USDC, $901,000 in USDT, plus wrapped ETH and FUSD. These amounts came from the hacker’s locked assets. Venus Protocol Recovering Funds Via Forced Liquidations | Source: X Investigators also noted that some of the gas… The post Venus Protocol Recovers Stolen Funds but Raises Another Risk appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insights: Venus Protocol clawed back $13.5 million after a whale was hacked, using forced liquidation. Recovery showed funds could be saved, but also revealed that Venus can directly intervene. Debate grows: Is Venus Protocol truly decentralized if it can pause and take control? Venus Protocol, a lending platform on BNB Chain, has brought back stolen funds. A whale lost about $13.5 million on Sept 2, 2025, in a phishing attack. Services were paused right after to stop more damage. Now, Venus has stated all services are back online. The lost funds were taken back through a special process called force liquidation. This means the hacker’s loans were closed, and the tokens locked as safety measures were seized. The recovery helped save the whale, but it also raised a new question about how much control Venus has over user funds. How the Venus Protocol Recovery Worked? The crypto hack yesterday did not break Venus Protocol’s smart contracts. Instead, the hacker tricked the whale’s wallet setup. The attacker replaced one normal action with another hidden action. That gave them power over the whale’s funds. Venus Protocol used force liquidation to undo the damage. In simple words, when users borrow on Venus, they must lock tokens as security. If they fail to pay, or if something goes wrong, those tokens can be sold or seized. Venus Protocol Announces Resumption Of Services | Source: X That is what happened to the hacker. Venus closed their loan, sold the safety tokens, and got back the stolen funds. On-chain data shows the Venus Liquidator address received more than $325,000 in USDC, $901,000 in USDT, plus wrapped ETH and FUSD. These amounts came from the hacker’s locked assets. Venus Protocol Recovering Funds Via Forced Liquidations | Source: X Investigators also noted that some of the gas…

Venus Protocol Recovers Stolen Funds but Raises Another Risk

4 min read

Key Insights:

  • Venus Protocol clawed back $13.5 million after a whale was hacked, using forced liquidation.
  • Recovery showed funds could be saved, but also revealed that Venus can directly intervene.
  • Debate grows: Is Venus Protocol truly decentralized if it can pause and take control?

Venus Protocol, a lending platform on BNB Chain, has brought back stolen funds. A whale lost about $13.5 million on Sept 2, 2025, in a phishing attack. Services were paused right after to stop more damage.

Now, Venus has stated all services are back online. The lost funds were taken back through a special process called force liquidation. This means the hacker’s loans were closed, and the tokens locked as safety measures were seized.

The recovery helped save the whale, but it also raised a new question about how much control Venus has over user funds.

How the Venus Protocol Recovery Worked?

The crypto hack yesterday did not break Venus Protocol’s smart contracts. Instead, the hacker tricked the whale’s wallet setup. The attacker replaced one normal action with another hidden action. That gave them power over the whale’s funds.

Venus Protocol used force liquidation to undo the damage. In simple words, when users borrow on Venus, they must lock tokens as security. If they fail to pay, or if something goes wrong, those tokens can be sold or seized.

Venus Protocol Announces Resumption Of Services | Source: X

That is what happened to the hacker. Venus closed their loan, sold the safety tokens, and got back the stolen funds.

On-chain data shows the Venus Liquidator address received more than $325,000 in USDC, $901,000 in USDT, plus wrapped ETH and FUSD. These amounts came from the hacker’s locked assets.

Venus Protocol Recovering Funds Via Forced Liquidations | Source: X

Investigators also noted that some of the gas fees came from Monero (XMR) exchanges, a method often linked to North Korean hacking groups. That background made the attack even more concerning.

The method worked this time. But it also showed that Venus can step in directly, which many say goes against the full idea of decentralization.

Venus Protocol Services Back Online, but Not Everyone Is Happy

Venus Protocol said all actions, like withdrawals, repayments, and liquidations, are now working again. The team explained they had to pause yesterday to stop the hacker from taking more.

The quick recovery made some users happy. But others raised concerns. Many on social media asked, “If Venus can pause and take over positions, is it truly decentralized?” Others joked about “forced liquidation,” showing how much control the platform holds.

Community Connects The Measure To Centralization | Source: X

This split shows the core issue. DeFi is built on the idea that code rules everything. But real-world hacks force teams to act, and those actions often look more centralized than people expect.

What It Means for DeFi Going Forward?

The stolen funds from Venus Protocol are back, and the whale is safe. Still, the incident shows bigger lessons.

First, even strong setups like hardware wallets are not always safe. If the linked browser extension or computer is tricked, the wallet can still be misused.

Second, recovery by force liquidation highlights both power and weakness. It saved funds this time. But it also showed that protocols can override positions when needed. That makes people question if these systems are as hands-off as promised.

Finally, this case sets an example for other platforms. Do they pause and act to protect users? Or do they stay hands-off and let losses happen? Venus Protocol chose to act.

The stolen funds may be back, but the question about how much control DeFi teams hold is not going away.

Source: https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2025/09/03/venus-protocol-recovers-stolen-funds-but-raises-another-risk/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Manchester City Donnarumma Doubters Have Missed Something Huge

The Manchester City Donnarumma Doubters Have Missed Something Huge

The post The Manchester City Donnarumma Doubters Have Missed Something Huge appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. MANCHESTER, ENGLAND – SEPTEMBER 14: Gianluigi Donnarumma of Manchester City celebrates the second City goal during the Premier League match between Manchester City and Manchester United at Etihad Stadium on September 14, 2025 in Manchester, England. (Photo by Visionhaus/Getty Images) Visionhaus/Getty Images For a goalkeeper who’d played an influential role in the club’s first-ever Champions League triumph, it was strange to see Gianluigi Donnarumma so easily discarded. Soccer is a brutal game, but the sudden, drastic demotion of the Italian from Paris Saint-Germain’s lineup for the UEFA Super Cup clash against Tottenham Hotspur before he was sold to Manchester City was shockingly brutal. Coach Luis Enrique isn’t a man who minces his words, so he was blunt when asked about the decision on social media. “I am supported by my club and we are trying to find the best solution,” he told a news conference. “It is a difficult decision. I only have praise for Donnarumma. He is one of the very best goalkeepers out there and an even better man. “But we were looking for a different profile. It’s very difficult to take these types of decisions.” The last line has really stuck, especially since it became clear that Manchester City was Donnarumma’s next destination. Pep Guardiola, under whom the Italian will be playing this season, is known for brutally axing goalkeepers he didn’t feel fit his profile. The most notorious was Joe Hart, who was jettisoned many years ago for very similar reasons to Enrique. So how can it be that the Catalan coach is turning once again to a so-called old-school keeper? Well, the truth, as so often the case, is not quite that simple. As Italian soccer expert James Horncastle pointed out in The Athletic, Enrique’s focus on needing a “different profile” is overblown. Lucas Chevalier,…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:38
Marathon Digital BTC Transfers Highlight Miner Stress

Marathon Digital BTC Transfers Highlight Miner Stress

The post Marathon Digital BTC Transfers Highlight Miner Stress appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a tense week for crypto markets, marathon digital has drawn
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/06 15:16
This U.S. politician’s suspicious stock trade just returned over 200% in weeks

This U.S. politician’s suspicious stock trade just returned over 200% in weeks

The post This U.S. politician’s suspicious stock trade just returned over 200% in weeks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. United States Representative Cloe Fields has seen his stake in Opendoor Technologies (NASDAQ: OPEN) stock return over 200% in just a matter of weeks. According to congressional trade filings, the lawmaker purchased a stake in the online real estate company on July 21, 2025, investing between $1,001 and $15,000. At the time, the stock was trading around $2 and had been largely stagnant for months. Receive Signals on US Congress Members’ Stock Trades Stocks Stay up-to-date on the trading activity of US Congress members. The signal triggers based on updates from the House disclosure reports, notifying you of their latest stock transactions. Enable signal The trade has since paid off, with Opendoor surging to $10, a gain of nearly 220% in under two months. By comparison, the broader S&P 500 index rose less than 5% during the same period. OPEN one-week stock price chart. Source: Finbold Assuming he invested a minimum of $1,001, the purchase would now be worth about $3,200, while a $15,000 stake would have grown to nearly $48,000, generating profits of roughly $2,200 and $33,000, respectively. OPEN’s stock rally Notably, Opendoor’s rally has been fueled by major corporate shifts and market speculation. For instance, in August, the company named former Shopify COO Kaz Nejatian as CEO, while co-founders Keith Rabois and Eric Wu rejoined the board, moves seen as a return to the company’s early innovative spirit.  Outgoing CEO Carrie Wheeler’s resignation and sale of millions in stock reinforced the sense of a new chapter. Beyond leadership changes, Opendoor’s surge has taken on meme-stock characteristics. In this case, retail investors piled in as shares climbed, while short sellers scrambled to cover, pushing prices higher.  However, the stock is still not without challenges, where its iBuying model is untested at scale, margins are thin, and debt tied to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:02