Star Xu says CEX listings require accountability, while CZ argues open access should let users decide what to trade. Debate over token listings has resurfaced tensionsStar Xu says CEX listings require accountability, while CZ argues open access should let users decide what to trade. Debate over token listings has resurfaced tensions

OKX CEO Pushes Back on Claims That DEXs and CEXs Are the Same

2026/02/11 03:30
3 min read

Star Xu says CEX listings require accountability, while CZ argues open access should let users decide what to trade.

Debate over token listings has resurfaced tensions between centralized and decentralized crypto platforms. Recent comments from Binance co-founder Changpeng Zhao sparked a wider discussion on whether exchanges should list every available token. OKX founder quickly pushed back, arguing that such views ignore core differences between platform models. 

Xu Draws Clear Line Between Centralized and Decentralized Exchanges 

OKX founder and CEO Star Xu has rejected claims that centralized and decentralized exchanges operate under the same principles. His comments respond to a debate on token listings, user responsibility, and platform accountability.

Star Xu argued that comparing CEXs and DEXs creates a false equivalence. According to Xu, each serves a distinct role within crypto markets. DEXs offer open, permissionless access and operate as tools rather than intermediaries. Responsibility rests fully with users, who manage their funds and accept the risks tied to each transaction.

According to Xu, centralized exchanges operate under a different standard. User funds remain under the exchange’s custody, similar to banks holding deposits. Such control creates legal and ethical obligations under AML rules, sanctions screening, fraud prevention, and consumer protection.

Therefore, listing decisions cannot be treated as value-neutral acts. Xu further warned that calls to treat CEX listings like DEX listings amount to avoiding responsibility. The CEO added that openness does not excuse the need for standards. He added that such thinking reflects a deeper values gap between OKX and Binance.

Moreover, regulatory views also help explain why the distinction matters. Former SEC Chair Paul Atkins has described self-custody as a core property right.

Such thinking aligns with DEX design, where platforms never control assets. On the other hand, centralized exchanges carry expectations tied to their custodial role.

CZ Calls Out Double Standard in Memecoin Listing Debate

The debate gained momentum after crypto analyst Benjamin Cowen criticized exchanges for frequently listing low-quality memecoins. Cowen argued that aggressive listings cater to short-term retail activity while damaging credibility. 

Response came quickly from Changpeng Zhao, who rejected Cowen’s criticism as inconsistent. He pointed out that it is inconsistent to praise decentralized exchanges for listing every token while blaming centralized exchanges for doing something similar.

Zhao believes exchanges should offer broad access and let users decide what to trade. He also noted that each platform has its own listing rules, which can change.

“I believe exchanges should provide access to everything. Well, this line will certainly get some heat. Why isn’t that token you like not listed? Every exchange have their own listing framework (which may change over time).”

Changpeng Zhao said.

In subsequent comments, Zhao acknowledged the limits of open listings. Securities concerns and flawed smart contracts complicate full access. Still, he maintained that listing a token does not mean users must buy. 

The post OKX CEO Pushes Back on Claims That DEXs and CEXs Are the Same appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Market Opportunity
Polytrade Logo
Polytrade Price(TRADE)
$0,0333
$0,0333$0,0333
+2,24%
USD
Polytrade (TRADE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Softer CPI keeps PBoC easing in play – TD Securities

Softer CPI keeps PBoC easing in play – TD Securities

The post Softer CPI keeps PBoC easing in play – TD Securities appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TD Securities expects China’s January CPI to slow, with its forecast
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/11 05:47
XRP price prediction – Odds of hitting the $2-level in February are…

XRP price prediction – Odds of hitting the $2-level in February are…

The post XRP price prediction – Odds of hitting the $2-level in February are… appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Like the broader crypto market, XRP’s relief
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/11 06:01