The post David Schwartz Comments as Old Epstein Claims Drag Ripple and XRP Back Into Focus appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Unverified claims circulatingThe post David Schwartz Comments as Old Epstein Claims Drag Ripple and XRP Back Into Focus appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Unverified claims circulating

David Schwartz Comments as Old Epstein Claims Drag Ripple and XRP Back Into Focus

3 min read
Ripple XRP email controversy

The post David Schwartz Comments as Old Epstein Claims Drag Ripple and XRP Back Into Focus appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Unverified claims circulating online are once again linking early crypto figures, old emails, and the long-running XRP story. At the centre of the discussion is an alleged email from July 31, 2014, said to have been sent by tech entrepreneur Austin Hill, which raised concerns about Ripple and Stellar, a project founded by Jed McCaleb, who also co-founded Ripple and XRP.

What the Alleged Email Says

According to online posts, the email was addressed to Joichi Ito and Jeffrey Epstein, with the subject line “Stellar isn’t so Stellar.” In it, Hill allegedly warned that it was harmful for the ecosystem to have investors “backing two horses in the same race,” referring to Ripple and Stellar competing for the same financial backers.

Commentators claim this points to early power struggles in crypto’s formative years, though there is no proof of wrongdoing by any of the parties involved.

Claims Around MIT and Funding

The narrative goes further, alleging that Epstein had financial ties to academic institutions such as MIT’s Media Lab, where blockchain research was conducted. Public records have previously confirmed that Epstein donated money to MIT. However, claims that this funding influenced crypto markets, projects, or regulators remain unproven.

Some online discussions also try to connect these past associations to the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple, filed in 2020, and to former SEC chair Gary Gensler, who previously taught blockchain-related courses at MIT. While allegations of conflicts of interest are being circulated, there is no evidence that the SEC’s case against Ripple was driven by these academic or personal links.

  • Also Read :
  •   XRP Price Holds Support After Selloff as On-Chain Data Shows Reduced Downside Risk
  •   ,

David Schwartz Responds

Reacting to the resurfaced claims, David Schwartz, Chief Technology Officer at Ripple, shared a cautious but pointed view:

What Is Fact and What Is Not

Experts stress that many of these stories rely heavily on speculation, coincidence, and unverified interpretations rather than confirmed facts. The Ripple vs SEC case has unfolded mainly through court filings and judicial rulings, not leaked emails or historical associations.

As of now, there is no official confirmation that the alleged 2014 email or the relationships being discussed had any influence on XRP, Bitcoin, or regulatory decisions. Analysts caution investors to separate documented facts from online theories, especially during volatile market conditions when such narratives tend to spread quickly.

Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!

Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.

bell icon Subscribe to News

FAQs

Could these claims affect investor confidence in Ripple or Stellar?

Speculative claims can temporarily influence sentiment, causing some investors to hesitate. However, long-term confidence typically relies on project fundamentals, regulatory clarity, and market performance rather than historical allegations.

Should investors worry about unverified crypto conspiracies?

Speculative stories can spread fast, especially in volatile markets, but confirmed facts should guide investment decisions.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin challenges the role of layer 2 solutions in Ethereum's ecosystem. Layer 2's slow progress and Ethereum’s L1 scaling impact future strategies.
Share
Coinstats2026/02/04 04:08
USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

SAN ANTONIO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–USAA today announced the appointment of Dan Griffiths as Chief Information Officer, effective February 5, 2026. A proven financial‑services
Share
AI Journal2026/02/04 04:15
China drops Google antitrust case as U.S.-China talks focus on TikTok and Nvidia

China drops Google antitrust case as U.S.-China talks focus on TikTok and Nvidia

The post China drops Google antitrust case as U.S.-China talks focus on TikTok and Nvidia appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Beijing is shelving its antitrust case against Google, as the United States and China ramp up negotiations over TikTok and Nvidia during a tense period in relations. People briefed on the matter said China’s State Administration for Market Regulation chose to end the competition inquiry into Google, a status in Chinese called “zhongzhi”, the Financial Times reported on Thursday, The FT added that Google has not yet received formal paperwork confirming the closure of the case. After talks with Chinese counterparts in Madrid, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said a September 17 deadline that could have disrupted the popular social media app in the United States pushed negotiators toward a possible agreement. He noted the deadline could be extended by 90 days to finish the terms, without giving specifics. Bessent said that when commercial details are made public, the arrangement would keep cultural features of TikTok that Chinese negotiators want to protect. “They’re interested in Chinese characteristics of the app, which they think are soft power. We don’t care about Chinese characteristics. We care about national security,” Bessent told reporters at the close of two days of meetings. Trump hinted at possible Chinese stake in TikTok Asked whether China might hold a stake, former President Donald Trump said, “We haven’t decided that but it looks to me, and I’m speaking to President Xi on Friday, for confirmation of that.” A Trump has said the platform aided his re-election last year, and his personal account counts 15 million followers. The White House launched an official TikTok account last month. Any deal may still need approval from the Republican-led Congress. In 2024, Congress passed a law saying TikTok must be sold because of worries that China could access U.S. user data and use it for spying or influence. The Trump administration has…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 14:08