The post Vitalik Buterin Outlines Future of On-Chain Governance in Two-Layer Structure appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TLDR Vitalik Buterin proposes a two-The post Vitalik Buterin Outlines Future of On-Chain Governance in Two-Layer Structure appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TLDR Vitalik Buterin proposes a two-

Vitalik Buterin Outlines Future of On-Chain Governance in Two-Layer Structure

3 min read

TLDR

  • Vitalik Buterin proposes a two-layer governance structure combining prediction markets and decentralized preference-setting systems.
  • The execution layer relies on open markets to ensure accountability through financial incentives and transparent participation.
  • The second layer must avoid token-based voting to prevent 51% control and ensure pluralistic, fair decision-making.
  • Anonymous voting tools like MACI are recommended to reduce collusion and protect voter privacy.
  • This structure separates execution from judgment, enhancing resilience and fairness in on-chain governance systems.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin shared a new direction for on-chain mechanism design, proposing a clear two-layer governance structure. He described a combination of a market-driven execution layer and a decentralized preference layer. This model aims to balance financial incentives with fair, anonymous judgment systems that resist centralized control.

Execution Layer Will Emphasize Accountability Through Markets

In his post on X, Vitalik Buterin emphasized that future systems will rely on open prediction markets to execute decisions transparently and competitively. He stated, “If you make good decisions, you win money; if you make bad decisions, you lose money.” This ensures that accountability becomes an inherent part of decentralized execution.

The proposed first layer functions like a prediction market, where anyone can participate without restriction, and outcomes remain financially driven. According to Buterin, this model supports open participation and rewards decision-making accuracy with measurable results. He called it “the correct way to do a decentralized executive.”

In some cases, however, this layer may rely on centralized executives that remain replaceable and are still judged by a second layer. Buterin added, “Sometimes you will want to keep it simple and do a centralized executive at that layer instead.” This adjustment allows flexibility in protocol implementation while preserving accountability.

Second Layer Will Focus on Pluralism and Capture Resistance

Vitalik Buterin outlined the second layer as a decentralized, anonymous preference-setting system that avoids token-based voting entirely. “Token owners are not pluralistic,” he explained. “Anyone can buy in and get 51% of them.”

Therefore, this layer must avoid financialization and support intrinsic motivation. Votes should be anonymous, and Buterin recommended using tools like MACI to reduce collusion and manipulation in this layer. This structure helps maintain fairness by limiting influence from token holders or external incentives.

He stressed that this layer must be “capture-resistant and non-financialized.” Buterin believes this two-layer method provides clarity when designing future governance systems. He concluded, “Thinking in these two layers explicitly is best.”

The post Vitalik Buterin Outlines Future of On-Chain Governance in Two-Layer Structure appeared first on Blockonomi.

Source: https://blockonomi.com/vitalik-buterin-outlines-future-of-on-chain-governance-in-two-layer-structure/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Optimizely Named a Leader in the 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Personalization Engines

Optimizely Named a Leader in the 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Personalization Engines

Company recognized as a Leader for the second consecutive year NEW YORK, Feb. 5, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Optimizely, the leading digital experience platform (DXP) provider
Share
AI Journal2026/02/06 00:47
Elizabeth Warren raises ethics concerns over White House crypto czar David Sacks’ tenure

Elizabeth Warren raises ethics concerns over White House crypto czar David Sacks’ tenure

The post Elizabeth Warren raises ethics concerns over White House crypto czar David Sacks’ tenure appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Democratic lawmakers pressed David Sacks, President Donald Trump’s “crypto and AI czar,” on Sept. 17 to disclose whether he has exceeded the time limits of his temporary White House appointment, raising questions about possible ethics violations. In a letter signed by Senator Elizabeth Warren and seven other members of Congress, the lawmakers said Sacks may have surpassed the 130-day cap for Special Government Employees, a category that allows private-sector professionals to serve the government on a part-time or temporary basis. The Office of Government Ethics sets the cap to minimize conflicts of interest, as SGEs are permitted to continue receiving outside salaries while in government service. Warren has previously raised similar concerns around Sacks’ appointment. Conflict-of-interest worries Sacks, a venture capitalist and general partner at Craft Ventures, has played a high-profile role in shaping Trump administration policy on digital assets and artificial intelligence. Lawmakers argued that his private financial ties to Silicon Valley raise serious ethical questions if he is no longer within the bounds of SGE status. According to the letter: “When issuing your ethics waiver, the White House noted that the careful balance in conflict-of-interest rules for SGEs was reached with the understanding that they would only serve the public ‘on a temporary basis. For you in particular, compliance with the SGE time limit is critical, given the scale of your conflicts of interest.” The group noted that Sacks’ private salary from Craft Ventures is permissible only under the temporary provisions of his appointment. If he has worked past the legal limit, the lawmakers warned, his continued dual roles could represent a breach of ethics. Counting the days According to the letter, Sacks was appointed in December 2024 and began working around Trump’s inauguration on Jan. 20, 2025. By the lawmakers’ calculation, he reached the 130-day threshold in…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:37
Exclusive interview with Smokey The Bera, co-founder of Berachain: How the innovative PoL public chain solves the liquidity problem and may be launched in a few months

Exclusive interview with Smokey The Bera, co-founder of Berachain: How the innovative PoL public chain solves the liquidity problem and may be launched in a few months

Recently, PANews interviewed Smokey The Bera, co-founder of Berachain, to unravel the background of the establishment of this anonymous project, Berachain's PoL mechanism, the latest developments, and answered widely concerned topics such as airdrop expectations and new opportunities in the DeFi field.
Share
PANews2024/07/03 13:00