FCA CP26/4 sets out new UK crypto rules covering Consumer Duty, safeguarding, complaints, and stricter requirements for international crypto firm.FCA CP26/4 sets out new UK crypto rules covering Consumer Duty, safeguarding, complaints, and stricter requirements for international crypto firm.

UK’s FCA sets out stricter crypto rules in CP26/4 proposal

The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority has published Consultation Paper CP26/4, which outlines how its regulatory handbook will apply to firms carrying out newly regulated cryptoasset activities. The proposals outline standards of conduct, consumer protections, rules on safeguarding, and expectations for international firms looking to access the UK market. 

Under CP26/4, the FCA has proposed that the Consumer Duty be applied to crypto firms in the same way as it is for other authorized firms. As a result, firms that serve retail customers would have to show fair value, transparent disclosures, and effective consumer support. However, the Duty would not apply to trading between participants on a UK authorized qualifying cryptoasset trading platform.

The FCA’s draft guidance outlines who qualifies as a product manufacturer in crypto markets. Issuers of qualifying cryptoassets or stablecoins, crypto lending and borrowing platforms, and UK trading platforms would be included in that category.

Complaints, ombudsman oversight, and limits on compensation

CP26/4 confirms that crypto firms would be subject to the standard complaint-handling rules of the FCA. Formal procedures and strict response timelines would be in place, bringing crypto firms into line with established financial services practices.

The proposals would also include crypto activities under the Financial Ombudsman Service. The ombudsman would be able to issue binding awards of up to GBP350,000, providing the consumer with redress that many crypto firms have not yet offered. At the same time, the regulator does not intend to extend the Financial Services Compensation Scheme to crypto activities. Customers would not be compensated for investment losses if a crypto firm fails.

Safeguarding, reporting, and a higher bar for global firms

The consultation also alters the way client cryptoassets must be protected. Firms that deal, operate trading platforms, issue stablecoins, or provide custody could be subject to the FCA’s client asset rules. Client money would be segregated and protected under a statutory trust, similar to traditional finance requirements.

Notably, the FCA has proposed to apply its new regime of safeguarding to both qualifying cryptoassets and security tokens. Training and competence standards would also apply to retail clients for staff, although no mandatory qualifications are envisaged.

For governance, CP26/4 includes thresholds for increased supervision under the Senior Manager and Certification Regime. Large stablecoin issuers and custodians holding assets above certain levels would have increased compliance requirements.

International firms are subject to clearer location expectations. The FCA proposes that most firms serving UK clients operate through a UK legal entity. Limited flexibility may be required for trading platforms that need access to global liquidity, but the overall approach is tighter than for non-crypto firms. The consultation also points out that the Prudential Regulation Authority can take similar expectations of systemic stablecoin issuers.

In addition, the FCA has also opened a consultation on CP26/4 until 12 March 2026. Final rules are anticipated later in 2026, with an authorization gateway in September 2026 and the regime coming into force in October 2027.

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August

United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August

The post United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers. The author will not be held responsible for information that is found at the end of links posted on this page. If not otherwise explicitly mentioned in the body of the article, at the time of writing, the author has no position in any stock mentioned in this article and no business relationship with any company mentioned. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet. FXStreet and the author do not provide personalized recommendations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. FXStreet and the author will not be liable for any errors, omissions or any losses, injuries or damages arising from this information and its display or use. Errors and omissions excepted. The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:20
XRP Tests Structure, Not Collapse, as Fibonacci History Repeats

XRP Tests Structure, Not Collapse, as Fibonacci History Repeats

XRP is trading near $1.7 on the monthly timeframe, where price is interacting with a structurally important zone defined by long-term cycle behavior rather than
Share
Ethnews2026/01/31 22:46
Trump resents being forced to say he's sorry

Trump resents being forced to say he's sorry

Independent journalist Don Lemon was arrested this morning. So was Georgia Fort, also an independent journalist. Both covered a January 18 church protest in Minneapolis
Share
Alternet2026/01/31 21:52