Copper’s IPO outlook reflects investor demand for compliant crypto infrastructure with stable revenue and lower operational risk. Crypto custody firm Copper is Copper’s IPO outlook reflects investor demand for compliant crypto infrastructure with stable revenue and lower operational risk. Crypto custody firm Copper is

Copper Weighs IPO Talks as Crypto Infrastructure Firms Regain Public Market Interest

2026/01/31 00:15
3 min read

Copper’s IPO outlook reflects investor demand for compliant crypto infrastructure with stable revenue and lower operational risk.

Crypto custody firm Copper is weighing whether to pursue a public listing as activity in digital asset IPOs picks up again. As per sources familiar with the topic, decisions regarding a Wall Street debut will depend on revenue performance.

BitGo Listing Sets Reference Point for Custody Firms Like Copper

According to chatters from familiar sources, Copper has held preliminary talks with banks about a possible IPO. A party close to the development clarified that the process is still in its infant stages, with a potential deal depending on business outcomes. 

“As standard practice, Copper regularly assesses a range of potential financing options to support the business and our clients, but we are not planning an IPO,” a Copper spokesperson said in comments emailed to CoinDesk.

Interest in a Copper listing follows the recent market debut of rival custody firm BitGo, which listed on the New York Stock Exchange recently. Shares were priced at $18, giving BitGo a valuation near $2 billion. The stock rose 36% on its first trading day before closing at $18.49. Since then, shares have fallen to about $12.50, down roughly 30% from the IPO price.

Even though the firm has struggled post-listing, the Wall Street entry further cemented the crypto industry’s return to public markets. Crypto IPOs accelerated with Donald Trump’s return as the President of the United States. And this path was eased by pro-crypto regulations introduced by the Trump administration.

Major crypto companies entered public markets last year, including Circle, Bullish, and Gemini. According to data from PitchBook, at least 11 crypto IPOs raised $14.6 billion in 2025. In comparison, offerings the year before raised only $310 million.

Market performance has varied across listings. For example, infrastructure-focused firms often saw strong gains during their first days on the public markets. Meanwhile, consumer-facing platforms struggled after going public. Winklevoss twins-backed Gemini ended the year well below its offer price.

Crypto Investors Raise Bar on Compliance and Operational Oversight

Several trends now shape investor focus in the current cycle:

  • Shift toward financial infrastructure over token-linked business models.
  • Strong emphasis on compliance systems and governance.
  • Preference for steady, recurring revenue.
  • Closer scrutiny of operational controls and risk management.

Those factors align with Copper’s business. The firm provides crypto custody using multi-party computation, along with settlement and prime brokerage services. Clients include banks and trading firms seeking to reduce counterparty exposure.

According to Laura Katherine Mann, a partner at White & Case, 2026 is likely to favor companies with mature compliance and predictable income. She said firms offering core financial services may find stronger demand from public investors.

Copper has taken steps to strengthen its leadership team. Amar Kuchinad was appointed global chief executive in October 2024. And in March, Tammy Weinrib joined as chief compliance officer and Bank Secrecy Act officer for the Americas.

Although the firm is yet to confirm listing plans, the recent development reinforces the current trend of crypto-focused firms going public. And given Copper’s crypto profile, public market investors are keeping tabs on events as they unfold.

The post Copper Weighs IPO Talks as Crypto Infrastructure Firms Regain Public Market Interest appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

The post SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SEI is consolidating at the $0.08 level under general downtrend pressure; although RSI
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:43
South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

The post South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief South Korean exchange Bithumb
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:16