Enterprises seek platforms that can address process improvement and diverging regulations with support for insights and compliance, new research says STAMFORD, Enterprises seek platforms that can address process improvement and diverging regulations with support for insights and compliance, new research says STAMFORD,

Sustainability Software Evolves to Meet Changing Demands, ISG Says

6 min read

Enterprises seek platforms that can address process improvement and diverging regulations with support for insights and compliance, new research says

STAMFORD, Conn.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–$III #ISGProviderLens–Sustainability software is increasingly essential in enterprises as regulators and stakeholders expect organizations to measure and disclose environmental impacts, driving demand for applications that collect, analyze and report sustainability data, according to new research from global AI-centered technology research and advisory firm Information Services Group (ISG) (Nasdaq: III).

The ISG Buyers Guide™ for Sustainability Management, produced by ISG Research, provides the rankings and ratings of 20 software providers and their products to support environmental sustainability. The research finds that enterprises need to accurately measure and disclose environmental impacts to fulfill their sustainability goals, and sustainability software supports these requirements by enabling organizations to provide transparent, auditable disclosures. The Buyers Guide for Sustainability Emerging Providers ranks and rates 12 innovative providers of sustainability software that may better suit specific enterprise needs or offer a lower total cost of implementation and ownership.

“Companies need consistent, accurate sustainability data to both comply with regulations and monitor how resources are used across the business,” said Robert Kugel, executive director, Business Research, ISG. “They have a growing number of software platforms to choose from that can meet diverse, evolving requirements.”

The environmental realm is the most complex of the three areas of sustainability companies must address, which also include social and governance topics, the research finds. It extends to environmental risks to a business and strategies to mitigate those risks. Under the principle of double materiality, enterprises need to understand both how their business affects the environment and how environmental factors can affect business results.

Yet despite the emergence of frameworks to create uniformity of data and disclosures, many enterprises still struggle with ambiguous definitions, inconsistent measurement methods and limited visibility into environmental data, the research shows. Through 2027, one-half of enterprises will lack sufficient data and software to measure their sustainability metrics to inform governance strategy, risk management and performance targets, ISG finds.

Divergent measurement and reporting standards across different regulatory environments compound the problem, the research finds. While the European Union has established a stronger mandate with its Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, several other governments have their own requirements, and state-level regulations are emerging in the U.S. These differences shape enterprise strategies and create complexity for multinational organizations.

In the face of growing challenges, companies are seeking sustainability software that can automate data collection, increase accuracy and reduce compliance risk, ISG finds. There is growing demand for real-time tracking, audit-ready disclosures and advanced capabilities including risk analysis, AI-driven forecasting and predictive analytics.

For its 2025 Buyers Guide for Sustainability Management, ISG evaluated software providers across three platform categories — Sustainability Management, Sustainability Insights and Sustainability Compliance. A total of 20 providers were assessed: AMCS, AuditBoard, Benchmark Gensuite, Cority, Diligent, IBM, Microsoft, Nasdaq, Oracle, Persefoni, Position Green, Sage, Salesforce, SAP, ServiceNow, Sievo, Sphera, Tango, Wolters Kluwer and Workiva.

ISG Research rates software providers in five evaluation categories: Overall, Product Experience (incorporating Capability and Platform) and Customer Experience. Providers ranked in the top three for each evaluation category are named as Leaders. Within each platform category, those with the most Leader rankings are named as Overall Leaders.

The Overall Leaders of the 2025 Buyers Guides™ for Sustainability were the following:

Sustainability Management: Workiva was the top Overall Leader, followed by Salesforce and Oracle. All three Overall Leaders were designated Leaders in four evaluation categories each. All three were rated Exemplary, along with Benchmark Gensuite, Diligent, Position Green and SAP. IBM and Microsoft were rated Innovative.

Sustainability Insights: Salesforce was the top Overall Leader, followed by Workiva and Oracle. Salesforce was designated a Leader in five evaluation categories, Workiva in three and Oracle in four. All three Overall Leaders were rated Exemplary, along with Benchmark Gensuite, Position Green, SAP and ServiceNow. Cority, IBM and Microsoft were rated Innovative.

Sustainability Compliance: Workiva was the top Overall Leader, followed by Oracle and Salesforce. All three Overall Leaders were designated Leaders in four evaluation categories each. All three were rated Exemplary, along with Benchmark Gensuite, Diligent, SAP, ServiceNow and Sphera. IBM and Microsoft were rated Innovative.

For its 2025 Buyers Guide for Sustainability Emerging Providers, ISG evaluated 12 providers: Datamaran, EcoOnline, Greenly, Green Project, Lucanet, Novata, Novisto, Plan A, Pulsora, Sweep, Watershed and Worldly.

The Overall Leaders of the 2025 Buyers Guide for Sustainability Emerging Providers were the following:

Sustainability Emerging Providers: Pulsora was the top Overall Leader, followed by Watershed and Sweep. Pulsora was designated a Leader in three evaluation categories, Watershed in four and Sweep in three. All three Overall Leaders were rated Exemplary, along with Greenly. Green Project and Lucanet were rated Innovative.

“Enterprises evaluate sustainability software based on multiple factors, including the platform’s adaptability to integrate with existing systems,” said David Menninger, executive director, software research, ISG. “This research provides a comprehensive set of software provider ratings based on our RFI (request for information) framework, which allows organizations to determine which products can best meet their current and future needs.”

The ISG Buyers Guides™ for Sustainability are the distillation of more than a year of market and product research efforts. The research is not sponsored nor influenced by software providers and is conducted solely to help enterprises optimize their business and IT software investments.

Visit this webpage to learn more about the ISG Buyers Guides™ for Sustainability and read executive summaries of each of the two reports. The complete reports, including provider rankings across seven product and customer experience dimensions and detailed research findings on each provider, are available by contacting ISG Research.

About ISG

ISG (Nasdaq: III) is a global AI-centered technology research and advisory firm. A trusted partner to more than 900 clients, including 75 of the world’s top 100 enterprises, ISG is a long-time leader in technology and business services that is now at the forefront of leveraging AI to help organizations achieve operational excellence and faster growth. The firm, founded in 2006, is known for its proprietary market data, in-depth knowledge of provider ecosystems, and the expertise of its 1,600 professionals worldwide working together to help clients maximize the value of their technology investments.

Contacts

Press Contacts:
Laura Hupprich, ISG

+1 203 517 3100

laura.hupprich@isg-one.com

Julianna Sheridan, Matter Communications for ISG

+1 978 518 4520

isg@matternow.com

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Tom Lee’s BitMine Hits 7-Month Stock Low as Ethereum Paper Losses Reach $8 Billion

Tom Lee’s BitMine Hits 7-Month Stock Low as Ethereum Paper Losses Reach $8 Billion

The post Tom Lee’s BitMine Hits 7-Month Stock Low as Ethereum Paper Losses Reach $8 Billion appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Shares of BitMine Immersion
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/06 04:47
MYX Finance price surges again as funding rate points to a crash

MYX Finance price surges again as funding rate points to a crash

MYX Finance price went parabolic again as the recent short-squeeze resumed. However, the formation of a double-top pattern and the funding rate point to an eventual crash in the coming days. MYX Finance (MYX) came in the spotlight earlier this…
Share
Crypto.news2025/09/18 02:57
How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban

How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban

The post How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. WASHINGTON, DC – MARCH 13: Participants hold signs in support of TikTok outside the U.S. Capitol Building on March 13, 2024 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images) Getty Images From President Trump’s first ban attempt to a near-blackout earlier this year, TikTok’s five-year roller coaster ride looks like it’s finally slowing down now that Trump has unveiled a deal framework to keep the ByteDance app alive in the U.S. A look back at the saga around TikTok starting in 2020, however, shows just how close the app came to being shut out of the US – how it narrowly averted a ban and forced sale that found rare bipartisan backing in Washington. Recapping TikTok’s dramatic five-year battle When I interviewed Brendan Carr back in 2022, for example, the future FCC chairman was already certain at that point that TikTok’s days were numbered. For a litany of perceived sins — everything from the too-cozy relationship of the app’s parent company with China’s ruling regime to the app’s repeated floating of user privacy — Carr was already convinced, at least during his conversation with me, that: “The tide is going out on TikTok.” It was, in fact, one of the few issues that Washington lawmakers seemed to agree on. Even then-President Biden was on board, having resurrected Trump’s aborted TikTok ban from his first term and signed it into law. “It feels different now than it did two years ago at the end of the Trump administration, when concerns were first raised,” Carr told me then, in August of 2022. “I think, like a lot of things in the Trump era, people sort of picked sides on the issue based on the fact that it was Trump.” One thing led to another, though, and it looked like Carr was probably…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:29