The post APT Weekly Analysis Jan 20 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. APT closed the week with a slight 0.44% loss at $1.58; while the downtrend dominates, theThe post APT Weekly Analysis Jan 20 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. APT closed the week with a slight 0.44% loss at $1.58; while the downtrend dominates, the

APT Weekly Analysis Jan 20

APT closed the week with a slight 0.44% loss at $1.58; while the downtrend dominates, the $1.51-$1.42 support confluence points to a potential base formation, but Bitcoin’s sideways bearish supertrend signal enforces a cautious market structure for altcoins.

Weekly Market Summary for APT

APT stayed within a narrow $1.56-$1.63 trading range last week and closed the week at $1.58 with a 0.44% decline. Volume profile remained low at $98.71M, indicating market participants are cautiously seeking direction. RSI at 37.67 is stuck in the neutral-bearish zone, while MACD confirms bearish momentum with a negative histogram. Trading below the short-term EMA20 ($1.78) leads to a bearish trend filter signal, with $1.96 resistance standing out as the main obstacle. In the big picture, APT is under distribution pressure rather than accumulation; however, multi-timeframe supports ($1.4160 and $1.5170) offer critical confluence points for a potential reversal. In the macro context, Bitcoin’s sideways movement around $90K and bearish supertrend limit altcoin rotation. For position traders, strategic positioning between a $2.39 upside target and $0.72 downside risk should be prioritized this week by calculating risk/reward ratios. Check the APT Spot Analysis page for detailed spot data.

Trend Structure and Market Phases

Long-Term Trend Analysis

The long-term trend structure exhibits a clear bearish character. On the weekly chart, APT continues to remain below EMA20 ($1.78) and higher EMA50/200 averages, confirming the strength of the bearish trend. Price pulled back without testing the $1.96 trend filter resistance, maintaining the lower high/lower low pattern in market structure. Momentum indicators (RSI 37.67, MACD negative) sustain the bearish bias without approaching oversold levels. In the market cycle context, APT appears to have entered a consolidation/distribution phase following the rally at the end of 2025; however, the trend remains intact as long as the $1.4160 main support holds. For portfolio managers, this structure justifies a short bias on a monthly horizon, but macro risk appetite (e.g., Fed policies or post-BTC halving cycle) keeps reversal potential alive.

Accumulation/Distribution Analysis

Market phase analysis shows distribution patterns dominating in recent weeks: selling pressure was observed at the upper range ($1.63) alongside declining volume, signaling strong hands preparing to close positions. Volume profile remained low at $98.71M, with POC (Point of Control) stabilizing around $1.58. For accumulation signals, volume increase is expected in the $1.5170-$1.4160 support zone; this area could function as a potential ‘spring’ point in Wyckoff methodology. While distribution phase features (upper shadows, failing rallies) prevail, retail buying on support tests could trigger a shift to accumulation. Strategically, long positions are risky until distribution completes; monitor leverage margins via APT Futures Analysis.

Multi-Timeframe Confluence

Daily Chart View

On the daily timeframe, 2 supports/2 resistances show strong confluence: $1.5170 (score 65/100) and $1.4160 (66/100) supports overlap with Fibonacci retracement and volume clusters. Resistances at $1.6160 (63/100) and $1.7070 (67/100) block upward breakouts. No RSI divergence, MACD histogram narrowing may signal momentum shift. Daily structure is within a bearish channel; a $1.51 breakdown increases short squeeze risk, while an upper breakout leads to EMA20 ($1.78). Confluence score is high: 1D levels align with 3D.

Weekly Chart View

On the weekly perspective, there are 12 strong levels with 2S/2R (1D:2S/2R, 3D:1S/3R, 1W:2S/2R). The weekly doji-like candle reflects indecision; if price holds above $1.4160 weekly support, transition to accumulation phase is possible. Bearish supertrend active below EMA20, but downside carries measured move potential to $0.72. Upper target $2.3919 (score 48), aligned with channel upper band. Multi-TF confluence makes $1.51 an inflection point: downside breakdown signals bearish continuation, upside carries bull trap risk. Visit the APT and other analyses section for more analysis.

Critical Decision Points

Key levels will define direction: Supports: $1.5170 (high volume, score 65), $1.4160 (major, score 66) – breakdown here initiates downside cascade to $0.7216. Resistances: $1.6160 (score 63), $1.7070 (major, score 67), $1.96 trend filter. Levels between offer R/R 1:3+; short below $1.51, consider partial long above. Market structure says ‘bounce potential as long as $1.4160 holds’.

Weekly Strategy Recommendation

In Upside Case

Bullish scenario triggered by close above $1.6160: First target $1.7070, then $1.96 EMA20. Upside objective extends to $2.3919 (channel target). Strategy: Confirmed long at $1.51 support, stop below $1.41, partial profit at $1.70. R/R 1:2.5+, position size 2-3% portfolio.

In Downside Case

Bearish scenario on breakdown below $1.5170: Targets $1.4160, then $0.7216 (score 22). Strategy: Short entry below $1.51, stop above $1.62, trailing stop to channel lows. R/R 1:4+, strengthened by BTC bearish confluence. Risk management: Max 1.5% exposure.

Bitcoin Correlation

BTC at $90,730 with -2.38% change, sideways bearish; key supports $89,371/$87,645, resistances $91,012/$92,446. BTC bearish supertrend signal puts altcoins in caution mode: APT correlated to BTC at 0.85%, BTC drop below $89K pushes APT to $1.41 support. BTC breakout above $91K triggers alt rotation, opening path to $2.39. Watch: BTC dom above 52% strengthens APT short bias.

Conclusion: Key Points for Next Week

Next week focus: $1.5170-$1.4160 support test and BTC $89K-$91K range. Volume increase + RSI >45 signals bounce, breakdown triggers short. Trend intact as long as $1.4160 holds; if distribution completes, $0.72 becomes risky. Position traders should wait for confluence, monitor macro news (Fed/ETF flows).

This analysis uses Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal’s market views and methodology.

Trading Analyst: Emily Watson

Short-term trading strategies expert

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/apt-weekly-strategy-critical-support-test-in-downtrend-january-20-2026

Market Opportunity
Ucan fix life in1day Logo
Ucan fix life in1day Price(1)
$0.001311
$0.001311$0.001311
+1.54%
USD
Ucan fix life in1day (1) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

21Shares Launches JitoSOL Staking ETP on Euronext for European Investors

21Shares Launches JitoSOL Staking ETP on Euronext for European Investors

21Shares launches JitoSOL staking ETP on Euronext, offering European investors regulated access to Solana staking rewards with additional yield opportunities.Read
Share
Coinstats2026/01/30 12:53
Digital Asset Infrastructure Firm Talos Raises $45M, Valuation Hits $1.5 Billion

Digital Asset Infrastructure Firm Talos Raises $45M, Valuation Hits $1.5 Billion

Robinhood, Sony and trading firms back Series B extension as institutional crypto trading platform expands into traditional asset tokenization
Share
Blockhead2026/01/30 13:30
Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Turn lengthy earnings call transcripts into one-page insights using the Financial Modeling Prep APIPhoto by Bich Tran Earnings calls are packed with insights. They tell you how a company performed, what management expects in the future, and what analysts are worried about. The challenge is that these transcripts often stretch across dozens of pages, making it tough to separate the key takeaways from the noise. With the right tools, you don’t need to spend hours reading every line. By combining the Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) API with Groq’s lightning-fast LLMs, you can transform any earnings call into a concise summary in seconds. The FMP API provides reliable access to complete transcripts, while Groq handles the heavy lifting of distilling them into clear, actionable highlights. In this article, we’ll build a Python workflow that brings these two together. You’ll see how to fetch transcripts for any stock, prepare the text, and instantly generate a one-page summary. Whether you’re tracking Apple, NVIDIA, or your favorite growth stock, the process works the same — fast, accurate, and ready whenever you are. Fetching Earnings Transcripts with FMP API The first step is to pull the raw transcript data. FMP makes this simple with dedicated endpoints for earnings calls. If you want the latest transcripts across the market, you can use the stable endpoint /stable/earning-call-transcript-latest. For a specific stock, the v3 endpoint lets you request transcripts by symbol, quarter, and year using the pattern: https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={q}&year={y}&apikey=YOUR_API_KEY here’s how you can fetch NVIDIA’s transcript for a given quarter: import requestsAPI_KEY = "your_api_key"symbol = "NVDA"quarter = 2year = 2024url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={API_KEY}"response = requests.get(url)data = response.json()# Inspect the keysprint(data.keys())# Access transcript contentif "content" in data[0]: transcript_text = data[0]["content"] print(transcript_text[:500]) # preview first 500 characters The response typically includes details like the company symbol, quarter, year, and the full transcript text. If you aren’t sure which quarter to query, the “latest transcripts” endpoint is the quickest way to always stay up to date. Cleaning and Preparing Transcript Data Raw transcripts from the API often include long paragraphs, speaker tags, and formatting artifacts. Before sending them to an LLM, it helps to organize the text into a cleaner structure. Most transcripts follow a pattern: prepared remarks from executives first, followed by a Q&A session with analysts. Separating these sections gives better control when prompting the model. In Python, you can parse the transcript and strip out unnecessary characters. A simple way is to split by markers such as “Operator” or “Question-and-Answer.” Once separated, you can create two blocks — Prepared Remarks and Q&A — that will later be summarized independently. This ensures the model handles each section within context and avoids missing important details. Here’s a small example of how you might start preparing the data: import re# Example: using the transcript_text we fetched earliertext = transcript_text# Remove extra spaces and line breaksclean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip()# Split sections (this is a heuristic; real-world transcripts vary slightly)if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1)else: prepared, qna = clean_text, ""print("Prepared Remarks Preview:\n", prepared[:500])print("\nQ&A Preview:\n", qna[:500]) With the transcript cleaned and divided, you’re ready to feed it into Groq’s LLM. Chunking may be necessary if the text is very long. A good approach is to break it into segments of a few thousand tokens, summarize each part, and then merge the summaries in a final pass. Summarizing with Groq LLM Now that the transcript is clean and split into Prepared Remarks and Q&A, we’ll use Groq to generate a crisp one-pager. The idea is simple: summarize each section separately (for focus and accuracy), then synthesize a final brief. Prompt design (concise and factual) Use a short, repeatable template that pushes for neutral, investor-ready language: You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call sectionfor {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise.Return:1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets)2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened)3) Forward outlook (specific statements)4) Risks / watch-outs5) Q&A takeaways (if present)Text:<<<{section_text}>>> Python: calling Groq and getting a clean summary Groq provides an OpenAI-compatible API. Set your GROQ_API_KEY and pick a fast, high-quality model (e.g., a Llama-3.1 70B variant). We’ll write a helper to summarize any text block, then run it for both sections and merge. import osimport textwrapimport requestsGROQ_API_KEY = os.environ.get("GROQ_API_KEY") or "your_groq_api_key"GROQ_BASE_URL = "https://api.groq.com/openai/v1" # OpenAI-compatibleMODEL = "llama-3.1-70b" # choose your preferred Groq modeldef call_groq(prompt, temperature=0.2, max_tokens=1200): url = f"{GROQ_BASE_URL}/chat/completions" headers = { "Authorization": f"Bearer {GROQ_API_KEY}", "Content-Type": "application/json", } payload = { "model": MODEL, "messages": [ {"role": "system", "content": "You are a precise, neutral equity research analyst."}, {"role": "user", "content": prompt}, ], "temperature": temperature, "max_tokens": max_tokens, } r = requests.post(url, headers=headers, json=payload, timeout=60) r.raise_for_status() return r.json()["choices"][0]["message"]["content"].strip()def build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year): template = """ You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call section for {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise. Return: 1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets) 2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened) 3) Forward outlook (specific statements) 4) Risks / watch-outs 5) Q&A takeaways (if present) Text: <<< {section_text} >>> """ return textwrap.dedent(template).format( symbol=symbol, quarter=quarter, year=year, section_text=section_text )def summarize_section(section_text, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024"): if not section_text or section_text.strip() == "": return "(No content found for this section.)" prompt = build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year) return call_groq(prompt)# Example usage with the cleaned splits from Section 3prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")final_one_pager = f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks — Key Points{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()print(final_one_pager[:1200]) # preview Tips that keep quality high: Keep temperature low (≈0.2) for factual tone. If a section is extremely long, chunk at ~5–8k tokens, summarize each chunk with the same prompt, then ask the model to merge chunk summaries into one section summary before producing the final one-pager. If you also fetched headline numbers (EPS/revenue, guidance) earlier, prepend them to the prompt as brief context to help the model anchor on the right outcomes. Building the End-to-End Pipeline At this point, we have all the building blocks: the FMP API to fetch transcripts, a cleaning step to structure the data, and Groq LLM to generate concise summaries. The final step is to connect everything into a single workflow that can take any ticker and return a one-page earnings call summary. The flow looks like this: Input a stock ticker (for example, NVDA). Use FMP to fetch the latest transcript. Clean and split the text into Prepared Remarks and Q&A. Send each section to Groq for summarization. Merge the outputs into a neatly formatted earnings one-pager. Here’s how it comes together in Python: def summarize_earnings_call(symbol, quarter, year, api_key, groq_key): # Step 1: Fetch transcript from FMP url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={api_key}" resp = requests.get(url) resp.raise_for_status() data = resp.json() if not data or "content" not in data[0]: return f"No transcript found for {symbol} {quarter} {year}" text = data[0]["content"] # Step 2: Clean and split clean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip() if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1) else: prepared, qna = clean_text, "" # Step 3: Summarize with Groq prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol, quarter, year) qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol, quarter, year) # Step 4: Merge into final one-pager return f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()# Example runprint(summarize_earnings_call("NVDA", 2, 2024, API_KEY, GROQ_API_KEY)) With this setup, generating a summary becomes as simple as calling one function with a ticker and date. You can run it inside a notebook, integrate it into a research workflow, or even schedule it to trigger after each new earnings release. Free Stock Market API and Financial Statements API... Conclusion Earnings calls no longer need to feel overwhelming. With the Financial Modeling Prep API, you can instantly access any company’s transcript, and with Groq LLM, you can turn that raw text into a sharp, actionable summary in seconds. This pipeline saves hours of reading and ensures you never miss the key results, guidance, or risks hidden in lengthy remarks. Whether you track tech giants like NVIDIA or smaller growth stocks, the process is the same — fast, reliable, and powered by the flexibility of FMP’s data. Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40