The post Community Burns $68B Supply Against $60B Collapse Legacy appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Community has burned 415B LUNC, but 5.5 trillion tokens remainThe post Community Burns $68B Supply Against $60B Collapse Legacy appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Community has burned 415B LUNC, but 5.5 trillion tokens remain

Community Burns $68B Supply Against $60B Collapse Legacy

  • Community has burned 415B LUNC, but 5.5 trillion tokens remain, making meaningful price recovery mathematically difficult.
  • Binance drives most liquidity and burns, creating single-point-of-failure risk if support weakens or listings change.
  • 2026 upside is speculative, capped near $0.000075–$0.00015, with downside amplified by USTC risks and legal overhang.

Terra Luna Classic $LUNC trades at $0.00004051, the remnant of crypto’s most catastrophic implosion—the May 2022 collapse that vaporized $60 billion when algorithmic stablecoin UST failed. What remains is a community-driven resurrection attempt fighting 5.5 trillion token hyperinflation, founder Do Kwon’s December 2025 fraud conviction, and mathematical reality: LUNC needs to burn 90%+ of supply or achieve impossible market caps to reach even $0.01.

The Collapse You’re Betting On

May 2022: Terra’s algorithmic stablecoin UST lost its $1 peg, triggering a death spiral. The mint-burn mechanism designed to stabilize UST instead hyperinflated LUNA supply from 350 million to 6.5 trillion tokens in days. Price collapsed from $80+ to $0.00001. $60 billion evaporated. Do Kwon fled, got arrested, and was convicted of fraud December 2025.

Terra forked into two chains: Terra 2.0 (new LUNA without stablecoin) and Terra Classic (LUNC, the zombie chain). LUNC has no backing from original developers or Terraform Labs—it’s purely community-maintained.

Technical Setup Shows Fragile Base

Terra Classic Price Dynamics (Source: TradingView)

The daily chart shows LUNC compressed within a broader descending structure since the December 2024 spike near $0.00018. Price trades below all major EMAs at $0.0000405 / $0.0000409 / $0.0000430 / $0.0000495, maintaining bearish alignment. The Supertrend at $0.0000483 continues to signal downside pressure.

Related: Zcash Price Prediction 2026: Grayscale ETF & Privacy Demand Target $700

Support at $0.000038–$0.000040 remains the immediate floor. A breakdown below this zone targets $0.000030–$0.000032. Bulls need a daily close above $0.000048 to challenge resistance at $0.000055–$0.000060. The rising trend line from October lows still provides structural support, but thin liquidity keeps volatility elevated in both directions.

Four Factors Drive Speculation

  • Burns Don’t Fix The Problem: LUNC burned 415 billion tokens but 5.5 trillion remain—that’s only 7% gone. Binance cut its burn rate in half. At this speed, reducing supply meaningfully takes decades, not months.
  • Basic Maintenance, Not Innovation: December’s upgrade fixed bugs and improved connections to other blockchains. Q1 2026 brings more technical housekeeping. These updates keep the chain alive but don’t create new value.
  • Dangerous Stablecoin Experiment: The community wants to revive USTC—the same stablecoin that crashed and destroyed $60 billion in 2022. USTC currently trades at $0.02 instead of $1. Reactivating this mechanism could trigger another collapse.
  • Empty DeFi Ecosystem: A few projects are building on LUNC, but user activity is minimal. Low transaction costs reflect low usage, not competitive advantage. Most developers already left for better opportunities.

The Do Kwon Shadow

Convicted of fraud December 2025, Do Kwon faces U.S. criminal trial delayed to January 2026 plus South Korean charges carrying 40 years potential sentence. LUNC dropped 45% on conviction news, then rebounded 85% on speculative bounce. Community operates independently of Kwon (he has zero control), but institutional investors won’t touch assets tied to convicted fraudster. Regulatory scrutiny persists. Some speculate Trump administration pardon—highly unlikely and immaterial to LUNC fundamentals.

The Math Problem Nobody Wants To Discuss

  • Current supply: 5.5 trillion LUNC
  • Current price: ~$0.00004
  • Current market cap: ~$220 million

For $0.01 LUNC:

  • Market cap required: $55 billion (larger than most top-20 cryptos)
  • Supply must burn to: 220 billion tokens (96% reduction)

For $1 LUNC:

  • Market cap required: $5.5 trillion (exceeds entire crypto market)
  • Mathematically impossible without token redenomination

Only paths higher: burn 90%+ of supply (decades at current pace), 1000:1 token consolidation (community resistance), or miracle adoption driving market cap to Bitcoin levels (zero probability).

Binance Dependency Risk

Binance burned ~50% of all LUNC destroyed. Provides majority trading liquidity. Changed policy from 100% to 50% fee burns—commitment weakening. If Binance further reduces burns or delists LUNC entirely, the project collapses. This single-exchange dependency creates catastrophic risk most LUNC holders ignore.

Related: BNB Price Prediction 2026: Token Burns & ETF Filings Target $1,400 Amid Supply Squeeze

Terra Classic Price Prediction: Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

Q1 2026: $0.000035-$0.000055

v3.6.1 full deployment, Cosmos SDK vote, Market Module testing begins, Do Kwon trial. Volatility around legal outcomes. Hold $0.000038 support or retest $0.000032.

Q2 2026: $0.000040-$0.000065

DeFi protocol launches, USTC burn execution, Binance monthly burns continue. Bulls need $0.000055 break to challenge $0.000065.

Q3 2026: $0.000045-$0.000075

RWA tokenization attempts, cross-chain bridge improvements, community governance proposals. Resistance $0.000070-$0.000075.

Q4 2026: $0.000050-$0.000090

Year-end burn assessment, developer activity metrics, exchange listing stability. Maximum realistic upside $0.000075-$0.000090 requires perfect execution and crypto bull market.

Terra Classic Price Forecast Table 2026

QuarterLow TargetHigh TargetKey Catalysts
Q1$0.000035$0.000055v3.6.1 deployment, Kwon trial, testing
Q2$0.000040$0.000065DeFi launches, USTC burn, Binance burns
Q3$0.000045$0.000075RWA efforts, bridges, governance
Q4$0.000050$0.000090Burn assessment, listings, metrics

What Portfolio Managers Should Know

  • Base case ($0.000050-$0.000075): Burns continue at current pace, chain remains functional, no major disasters, sideways crypto market. Modest 25-85% upside from current levels over 12 months.
  • Bull case ($0.000075-$0.00015): Accelerated burns, successful DeFi launches, crypto bull market, positive legal resolution. 85-270% upside requires multiple catalysts aligning.
  • Bear case ($0.000020-$0.000035): Binance reduces support, USTC re-peg fails, delistings cascade, crypto winter. 50-70% downside if support breaks.

This is not an investment—it’s lottery ticket speculation on whether a dedicated community can resurrect a spectacularly failed blockchain. Maximum position sizing: 1-2% of total portfolio, money you can afford to lose entirely.

The community deserves credit for persistence, but investors need reality: LUNC isn’t returning to $1 or $0.10 without structural changes (redenomination, 90%+ burns) that may never happen. You’re betting on the resurrection story, not fundamentals. 5.5 trillion supply, $60 billion collapse legacy, and convicted founder create headwinds no amount of community effort easily overcomes.

Current $0.00004 offers speculative upside to $0.000075-$0.00015 range if everything goes right in 2026, but understand the asymmetry: 2-4x upside potential versus 100% downside risk if Binance exits or re-peg fails. Trade accordingly.

Related: Dogecoin Price Prediction 2026: X Payments Speculation Faces Inflation & Development Deficit

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/terra-classic-prediction-2026-community-burns-68b-supply-against-60b-collapse-legacy/

Market Opportunity
Terra Classic Logo
Terra Classic Price(LUNC)
$0.00003596
$0.00003596$0.00003596
-0.85%
USD
Terra Classic (LUNC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

21Shares Launches JitoSOL Staking ETP on Euronext for European Investors

21Shares Launches JitoSOL Staking ETP on Euronext for European Investors

21Shares launches JitoSOL staking ETP on Euronext, offering European investors regulated access to Solana staking rewards with additional yield opportunities.Read
Share
Coinstats2026/01/30 12:53
Digital Asset Infrastructure Firm Talos Raises $45M, Valuation Hits $1.5 Billion

Digital Asset Infrastructure Firm Talos Raises $45M, Valuation Hits $1.5 Billion

Robinhood, Sony and trading firms back Series B extension as institutional crypto trading platform expands into traditional asset tokenization
Share
Blockhead2026/01/30 13:30
Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Turn lengthy earnings call transcripts into one-page insights using the Financial Modeling Prep APIPhoto by Bich Tran Earnings calls are packed with insights. They tell you how a company performed, what management expects in the future, and what analysts are worried about. The challenge is that these transcripts often stretch across dozens of pages, making it tough to separate the key takeaways from the noise. With the right tools, you don’t need to spend hours reading every line. By combining the Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) API with Groq’s lightning-fast LLMs, you can transform any earnings call into a concise summary in seconds. The FMP API provides reliable access to complete transcripts, while Groq handles the heavy lifting of distilling them into clear, actionable highlights. In this article, we’ll build a Python workflow that brings these two together. You’ll see how to fetch transcripts for any stock, prepare the text, and instantly generate a one-page summary. Whether you’re tracking Apple, NVIDIA, or your favorite growth stock, the process works the same — fast, accurate, and ready whenever you are. Fetching Earnings Transcripts with FMP API The first step is to pull the raw transcript data. FMP makes this simple with dedicated endpoints for earnings calls. If you want the latest transcripts across the market, you can use the stable endpoint /stable/earning-call-transcript-latest. For a specific stock, the v3 endpoint lets you request transcripts by symbol, quarter, and year using the pattern: https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={q}&year={y}&apikey=YOUR_API_KEY here’s how you can fetch NVIDIA’s transcript for a given quarter: import requestsAPI_KEY = "your_api_key"symbol = "NVDA"quarter = 2year = 2024url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={API_KEY}"response = requests.get(url)data = response.json()# Inspect the keysprint(data.keys())# Access transcript contentif "content" in data[0]: transcript_text = data[0]["content"] print(transcript_text[:500]) # preview first 500 characters The response typically includes details like the company symbol, quarter, year, and the full transcript text. If you aren’t sure which quarter to query, the “latest transcripts” endpoint is the quickest way to always stay up to date. Cleaning and Preparing Transcript Data Raw transcripts from the API often include long paragraphs, speaker tags, and formatting artifacts. Before sending them to an LLM, it helps to organize the text into a cleaner structure. Most transcripts follow a pattern: prepared remarks from executives first, followed by a Q&A session with analysts. Separating these sections gives better control when prompting the model. In Python, you can parse the transcript and strip out unnecessary characters. A simple way is to split by markers such as “Operator” or “Question-and-Answer.” Once separated, you can create two blocks — Prepared Remarks and Q&A — that will later be summarized independently. This ensures the model handles each section within context and avoids missing important details. Here’s a small example of how you might start preparing the data: import re# Example: using the transcript_text we fetched earliertext = transcript_text# Remove extra spaces and line breaksclean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip()# Split sections (this is a heuristic; real-world transcripts vary slightly)if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1)else: prepared, qna = clean_text, ""print("Prepared Remarks Preview:\n", prepared[:500])print("\nQ&A Preview:\n", qna[:500]) With the transcript cleaned and divided, you’re ready to feed it into Groq’s LLM. Chunking may be necessary if the text is very long. A good approach is to break it into segments of a few thousand tokens, summarize each part, and then merge the summaries in a final pass. Summarizing with Groq LLM Now that the transcript is clean and split into Prepared Remarks and Q&A, we’ll use Groq to generate a crisp one-pager. The idea is simple: summarize each section separately (for focus and accuracy), then synthesize a final brief. Prompt design (concise and factual) Use a short, repeatable template that pushes for neutral, investor-ready language: You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call sectionfor {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise.Return:1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets)2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened)3) Forward outlook (specific statements)4) Risks / watch-outs5) Q&A takeaways (if present)Text:<<<{section_text}>>> Python: calling Groq and getting a clean summary Groq provides an OpenAI-compatible API. Set your GROQ_API_KEY and pick a fast, high-quality model (e.g., a Llama-3.1 70B variant). We’ll write a helper to summarize any text block, then run it for both sections and merge. import osimport textwrapimport requestsGROQ_API_KEY = os.environ.get("GROQ_API_KEY") or "your_groq_api_key"GROQ_BASE_URL = "https://api.groq.com/openai/v1" # OpenAI-compatibleMODEL = "llama-3.1-70b" # choose your preferred Groq modeldef call_groq(prompt, temperature=0.2, max_tokens=1200): url = f"{GROQ_BASE_URL}/chat/completions" headers = { "Authorization": f"Bearer {GROQ_API_KEY}", "Content-Type": "application/json", } payload = { "model": MODEL, "messages": [ {"role": "system", "content": "You are a precise, neutral equity research analyst."}, {"role": "user", "content": prompt}, ], "temperature": temperature, "max_tokens": max_tokens, } r = requests.post(url, headers=headers, json=payload, timeout=60) r.raise_for_status() return r.json()["choices"][0]["message"]["content"].strip()def build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year): template = """ You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call section for {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise. Return: 1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets) 2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened) 3) Forward outlook (specific statements) 4) Risks / watch-outs 5) Q&A takeaways (if present) Text: <<< {section_text} >>> """ return textwrap.dedent(template).format( symbol=symbol, quarter=quarter, year=year, section_text=section_text )def summarize_section(section_text, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024"): if not section_text or section_text.strip() == "": return "(No content found for this section.)" prompt = build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year) return call_groq(prompt)# Example usage with the cleaned splits from Section 3prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")final_one_pager = f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks — Key Points{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()print(final_one_pager[:1200]) # preview Tips that keep quality high: Keep temperature low (≈0.2) for factual tone. If a section is extremely long, chunk at ~5–8k tokens, summarize each chunk with the same prompt, then ask the model to merge chunk summaries into one section summary before producing the final one-pager. If you also fetched headline numbers (EPS/revenue, guidance) earlier, prepend them to the prompt as brief context to help the model anchor on the right outcomes. Building the End-to-End Pipeline At this point, we have all the building blocks: the FMP API to fetch transcripts, a cleaning step to structure the data, and Groq LLM to generate concise summaries. The final step is to connect everything into a single workflow that can take any ticker and return a one-page earnings call summary. The flow looks like this: Input a stock ticker (for example, NVDA). Use FMP to fetch the latest transcript. Clean and split the text into Prepared Remarks and Q&A. Send each section to Groq for summarization. Merge the outputs into a neatly formatted earnings one-pager. Here’s how it comes together in Python: def summarize_earnings_call(symbol, quarter, year, api_key, groq_key): # Step 1: Fetch transcript from FMP url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={api_key}" resp = requests.get(url) resp.raise_for_status() data = resp.json() if not data or "content" not in data[0]: return f"No transcript found for {symbol} {quarter} {year}" text = data[0]["content"] # Step 2: Clean and split clean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip() if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1) else: prepared, qna = clean_text, "" # Step 3: Summarize with Groq prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol, quarter, year) qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol, quarter, year) # Step 4: Merge into final one-pager return f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()# Example runprint(summarize_earnings_call("NVDA", 2, 2024, API_KEY, GROQ_API_KEY)) With this setup, generating a summary becomes as simple as calling one function with a ticker and date. You can run it inside a notebook, integrate it into a research workflow, or even schedule it to trigger after each new earnings release. Free Stock Market API and Financial Statements API... Conclusion Earnings calls no longer need to feel overwhelming. With the Financial Modeling Prep API, you can instantly access any company’s transcript, and with Groq LLM, you can turn that raw text into a sharp, actionable summary in seconds. This pipeline saves hours of reading and ensures you never miss the key results, guidance, or risks hidden in lengthy remarks. Whether you track tech giants like NVIDIA or smaller growth stocks, the process is the same — fast, reliable, and powered by the flexibility of FMP’s data. Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40