The post Bitcoin – Could 2026 be an ‘off year’ for BTC’s price? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin [BTC] continues to trade below its 2025 opening levelThe post Bitcoin – Could 2026 be an ‘off year’ for BTC’s price? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin [BTC] continues to trade below its 2025 opening level

Bitcoin – Could 2026 be an ‘off year’ for BTC’s price?

Bitcoin [BTC] continues to trade below its 2025 opening level of approximately $93,576, while overall momentum across the cryptocurrency market has slowed as the year gradually draws to a close.

As the new year approaches, analysts are weighing the likelihood that Bitcoin may extend its sluggish performance, with the possibility that prices could decline further rather than recover.

Bitcoin winter still in play

Jurrien Timmer, Director of Global Macro at Fidelity Investments, one of the largest mutual fund firms in the United States, has suggested that 2026 could represent an “off year” for Bitcoin.

His assessment is based on BTC’s historical four-year halving cycle. According to Timmer, the asset could retreat to a support range between $65,000 and $75,000 next year if the cycle continues to play out as it has in the past.

The four-year halving cycle he referenced reflects a prolonged rally phase, roughly 145 months in this case, after a reduction in Bitcoin miners’ rewards.

Historically, this phase has often been followed by a broader market decline, as illustrated in long-term price charts.

Source: Fidelity

Timmer noted that Bitcoin’s all-time high of $126,000 in October aligned “perfectly in both price and time” with this historical framework.

Fidelity Investments, through its FBTC U.S. spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF), controls the second-largest Bitcoin ETF supply in the U.S. market.

FBTC holds Bitcoin valued at $16.73 billion, according to CoinGlass data, trailing only BlackRock’s IBIT ETF, which holds $65.57 billion.

If the bearish outlook holds, it could imply significant sell-offs from this cohort of Bitcoin investors. However, FBTC investors have so far shown bullish behavior this week, recording a net inflow of 179 BTC, equivalent to roughly $15.7 million.

Minimal demand in the market

The broader market has yet to witness sustained demand and has instead experienced more reshuffling than genuine accumulation capable of driving prices higher.

This dynamic helps explain why Bitcoin has remained range-bound between $85,000 and $93,000. The clarification follows a Glassnode analysis addressing reports that Bitcoin “sharks”, wallets holding between 100 and 1,000 BTC, had increased their holdings by 270,000 BTC.

Glassnode later clarified that the activity did not reflect true accumulation. Instead, it stemmed from large Bitcoin entities, those holding more than 100,000 BTC, undergoing internal wallet reshuffling.

Source: Glassnode

A senior analyst at Glassnode explained:

While large-entity supply shifted by roughly 300,000 BTC, about 270,000 BTC appeared in shark wallets.

However, the data ultimately showed a net negative balance of around 30,000 BTC, suggesting that these investors likely sold Bitcoin rather than accumulated it.

Regulatory and global context

Investor caution has intensified as the year winds down, driven by a series of regulatory and macroeconomic developments across major economies.

In the United States, the policy outlook has turned more dovish following Federal Open Market Committee rate cuts. Similar moves have been observed in Europe. However, capital outflows linked to rising Japanese bond yields have weighed on Bitcoin sentiment.

These policy shifts and uncertainties have left markets undecided on whether to deploy capital or remain on the sidelines.

Ray Youssef, CEO of the crypto super app NoOnes, provided additional context on the current environment in an email. He said,

Meanwhile, Jerome de Tychey, President of Ethereum France, told AMBCrypto that he expects crypto markets to increasingly align with traditional financial markets.

That shift may reduce crypto’s standing as a pure inflation hedge. Still, proponents argue that the continued adoption of blockchain-based financial infrastructure remains a positive long-term development for the sector.


Final Thoughts

  • Fidelity’s Director of Global Macro has pointed to Bitcoin trailing its traditional four-year cycle, describing 2026 as a potential “off year” or winter period.
  • Bitcoin demand remains weak, with market activity driven more by internal rotations than by genuine new purchases.
Previous: Curve DAO whale sits on $5.2M unrealized profit — then capitulates to $400K
Next: Why FARTCOIN’s rebound hinges on KEY support amid 26% weekly crash

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/bitcoin-could-2026-be-an-off-year-for-btcs-price/

Market Opportunity
Bitcoin Logo
Bitcoin Price(BTC)
$88,013.62
$88,013.62$88,013.62
+0.04%
USD
Bitcoin (BTC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness

Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness

The post Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP ETFs have crossed $1 billion in assets
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/20 02:55
Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

The post Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. American-based rock band Foreigner performs onstage at the Rosemont Horizon, Rosemont, Illinois, November 8, 1981. Pictured are, from left, Mick Jones, on guitar, and vocalist Lou Gramm. (Photo by Paul Natkin/Getty Images) Getty Images Singer Lou Gramm has a vivid memory of recording the ballad “Waiting for a Girl Like You” at New York City’s Electric Lady Studio for his band Foreigner more than 40 years ago. Gramm was adding his vocals for the track in the control room on the other side of the glass when he noticed a beautiful woman walking through the door. “She sits on the sofa in front of the board,” he says. “She looked at me while I was singing. And every now and then, she had a little smile on her face. I’m not sure what that was, but it was driving me crazy. “And at the end of the song, when I’m singing the ad-libs and stuff like that, she gets up,” he continues. “She gives me a little smile and walks out of the room. And when the song ended, I would look up every now and then to see where Mick [Jones] and Mutt [Lange] were, and they were pushing buttons and turning knobs. They were not aware that she was even in the room. So when the song ended, I said, ‘Guys, who was that woman who walked in? She was beautiful.’ And they looked at each other, and they went, ‘What are you talking about? We didn’t see anything.’ But you know what? I think they put her up to it. Doesn’t that sound more like them?” “Waiting for a Girl Like You” became a massive hit in 1981 for Foreigner off their album 4, which peaked at number one on the Billboard chart for 10 weeks and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:26
New York Regulators Push Banks to Adopt Blockchain Analytics

New York Regulators Push Banks to Adopt Blockchain Analytics

New York’s top financial regulator urged banks to adopt blockchain analytics, signaling tighter oversight of crypto-linked risks. The move reflects regulators’ concern that traditional institutions face rising exposure to digital assets. While crypto-native firms already rely on monitoring tools, the Department of Financial Services now expects banks to use them to detect illicit activity. NYDFS Outlines Compliance Expectations The notice, issued on Wednesday by Superintendent Adrienne Harris, applies to all state-chartered banks and foreign branches. In its industry letter, the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) emphasized that blockchain analytics should be integrated into compliance programs according to each bank’s size, operations, and risk appetite. The regulator cautioned that crypto markets evolve quickly, requiring institutions to update frameworks regularly. “Emerging technologies introduce evolving threats that require enhanced monitoring tools,” the notice stated. It stressed the need for banks to prevent money laundering, sanctions violations, and other illicit finance linked to virtual currency transactions. To that end, the Department listed specific areas where blockchain analytics can be applied: Screening customer wallets with crypto exposure to assess risks. Verifying the origin of funds from virtual asset service providers (VASPs). Monitoring the ecosystem holistically to detect money laundering or sanctions exposure. Identifying and assessing counterparties, such as third-party VASPs. Evaluating expected versus actual transaction activity, including dollar thresholds. Weighing risks tied to new digital asset products before rollout. These examples highlight how institutions can tailor monitoring tools to strengthen their risk management frameworks. The guidance expands on NYDFS’s Virtual Currency-Related Activities (VCRA) framework, which has governed crypto oversight in the state since 2022. Regulators Signal Broader Impact Market observers say the notice is less about new rules and more about clarifying expectations. By formalizing the role of blockchain analytics in traditional finance, New York is reinforcing the idea that banks cannot treat crypto exposure as a niche concern. Analysts also believe the approach could ripple beyond New York. Federal agencies and regulators in other states may view the guidance as a blueprint for aligning banking oversight with the realities of digital asset adoption. For institutions, failure to adopt blockchain intelligence tools may invite regulatory scrutiny and undermine their ability to safeguard customer trust. With crypto now firmly embedded in global finance, New York’s stance suggests that blockchain analytics are no longer optional for banks — they are essential to protecting the financial system’s integrity.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 08:49