Terraform Labs has filed a $4B lawsuit against Jump Trading, alleging secret deals, market manipulation, and illicit profits tied to UST and LUNA’s collapse.Terraform Labs has filed a $4B lawsuit against Jump Trading, alleging secret deals, market manipulation, and illicit profits tied to UST and LUNA’s collapse.

Terraform Labs administrator sues Jump Trading for $4B

The court-appointed administrator overseeing the closure and bankruptcy proceedings of the now-defunct Terraform Labs has filed a $4 billion lawsuit against Jump Trading, accusing the trading firm of knowingly playing a part in its collapse.

In the complaint filed Thursday in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Terraform Labs blames Jump for unlawfully profiting from Terraform’s rise and fall through “market manipulation, secret agreements, and misuse of digital assets.” 

The Office of the Terraform Labs Plan Administrator claims those actions helped inflate the ecosystem before leaving investors exposed when it unraveled. It is seeking to hold Jump co-founder William DiSomma and president Kanav Kariya accountable for allegedly acquiring wealth at the expense of TerraUSD stablecoin and its sister token, Luna. 

“The action aims to recover value for creditors and hold Jump responsible for exploiting the ecosystem, leaving unsuspecting investors to bear the losses,” the Terra Money Chapter 11 procedural official X account wrote.

Jump trading conducted secret token deals, administrator says

According to the lawsuit, Jump and Terraform supposedly entered into several secret agreements starting in 2019, which gave the former platform preferential access to Luna tokens at deeply discounted prices. Those arrangements allegedly allowed the trading firm to amass profits when Luna’s market value surged to an all-time high in 2022.

Per one agreement cited in the complaint, Jump purchased millions of Luna tokens for 40 cents a pop. At its peak, Luna traded above $110 per token, and according to court filings from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Jump made about $1 billion by selling the token at its highs.

The lawsuit also reiterated these deals were not disclosed to the public market, so Jump had an unfair advantage over retail investors who bought tokens without knowing the true structure of the ecosystem. The arrangements, according to the administrator, distorted market pricing and hid several fundamental weaknesses in the Luna token and Terraform’s business.

Speaking to the Wall Street Journal, a Jump spokeswoman rejected the claims and called the lawsuit an attempt by Do Kwon’s camp to deflect their responsibility in the fall of the digital token issuer. 

“This is a desperate attempt by Terraform Labs to shift blame and financial responsibility away from the crimes that Do Kwon committed. We will defend ourselves vigorously against these baseless claims,” she said.

Jump Trading propped up TerraUSD behind the scenes

Terraform Labs piled on their legal charges against Jump Trading saying it secretly intervened to support TerraUSD, Terraform’s algorithmic stablecoin, and helped trick the public to believe the system was functioning as it was meant to do.

Terraform collapsed in 2022 after TerraUSD lost its one-to-one peg with the US dollar, and Luna, the “system stabilizer,” plunged to near zero merely three days after the depeg. The sudden crash erased roughly $40 billion in market value and left thousands of investors with empty coffers.

The administrator alleges that before the final collapse, Jump had entered into a “gentlemen’s agreement” with Terraform to help keep TerraUSD’s peg. That arrangement was allegedly kept hidden to avoid regulatory scrutiny.

The office insisted that in May 2021, when UST briefly slipped below $1 and recovered, it was from the causality of large-scale purchases by Jump. The Chicago-based algorithmic trading company supposedly “misled the public” by pushing Terraform to tell the public UST’s peg had been restored organically.

Luna Foundation Guard benefited Jump officials and Do Kwon

After the initial depegging took place in 2021, Terraform created the Luna Foundation Guard, a reserve to defend TerraUSD using Bitcoin and other crypto assets. The plan administrator added that the foundation was directed by Terraform founder Do Kwon and Jump’s Kariya.

When TerraUSD depegged again in May 2022 and entered a so-called death spiral, the administrator claims nearly 50,000 bitcoins were transferred from the foundation to Jump without any written agreement of how the assets would be used.

Terraform filed for bankruptcy in January 2024 and agreed to pay about $4.5 billion to settle a civil securities fraud lawsuit brought by the SEC. About $300 million in assets have been recovered so far to compensate creditors, per public filings shared by the fallen crypto company.

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Market Opportunity
Jump Tom Logo
Jump Tom Price(JUMP)
$0.000000000000000000000001
$0.000000000000000000000001$0.000000000000000000000001
0.00%
USD
Jump Tom (JUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness

Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness

The post Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP ETFs have crossed $1 billion in assets
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/20 02:55
Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

The post Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. American-based rock band Foreigner performs onstage at the Rosemont Horizon, Rosemont, Illinois, November 8, 1981. Pictured are, from left, Mick Jones, on guitar, and vocalist Lou Gramm. (Photo by Paul Natkin/Getty Images) Getty Images Singer Lou Gramm has a vivid memory of recording the ballad “Waiting for a Girl Like You” at New York City’s Electric Lady Studio for his band Foreigner more than 40 years ago. Gramm was adding his vocals for the track in the control room on the other side of the glass when he noticed a beautiful woman walking through the door. “She sits on the sofa in front of the board,” he says. “She looked at me while I was singing. And every now and then, she had a little smile on her face. I’m not sure what that was, but it was driving me crazy. “And at the end of the song, when I’m singing the ad-libs and stuff like that, she gets up,” he continues. “She gives me a little smile and walks out of the room. And when the song ended, I would look up every now and then to see where Mick [Jones] and Mutt [Lange] were, and they were pushing buttons and turning knobs. They were not aware that she was even in the room. So when the song ended, I said, ‘Guys, who was that woman who walked in? She was beautiful.’ And they looked at each other, and they went, ‘What are you talking about? We didn’t see anything.’ But you know what? I think they put her up to it. Doesn’t that sound more like them?” “Waiting for a Girl Like You” became a massive hit in 1981 for Foreigner off their album 4, which peaked at number one on the Billboard chart for 10 weeks and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:26
New York Regulators Push Banks to Adopt Blockchain Analytics

New York Regulators Push Banks to Adopt Blockchain Analytics

New York’s top financial regulator urged banks to adopt blockchain analytics, signaling tighter oversight of crypto-linked risks. The move reflects regulators’ concern that traditional institutions face rising exposure to digital assets. While crypto-native firms already rely on monitoring tools, the Department of Financial Services now expects banks to use them to detect illicit activity. NYDFS Outlines Compliance Expectations The notice, issued on Wednesday by Superintendent Adrienne Harris, applies to all state-chartered banks and foreign branches. In its industry letter, the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) emphasized that blockchain analytics should be integrated into compliance programs according to each bank’s size, operations, and risk appetite. The regulator cautioned that crypto markets evolve quickly, requiring institutions to update frameworks regularly. “Emerging technologies introduce evolving threats that require enhanced monitoring tools,” the notice stated. It stressed the need for banks to prevent money laundering, sanctions violations, and other illicit finance linked to virtual currency transactions. To that end, the Department listed specific areas where blockchain analytics can be applied: Screening customer wallets with crypto exposure to assess risks. Verifying the origin of funds from virtual asset service providers (VASPs). Monitoring the ecosystem holistically to detect money laundering or sanctions exposure. Identifying and assessing counterparties, such as third-party VASPs. Evaluating expected versus actual transaction activity, including dollar thresholds. Weighing risks tied to new digital asset products before rollout. These examples highlight how institutions can tailor monitoring tools to strengthen their risk management frameworks. The guidance expands on NYDFS’s Virtual Currency-Related Activities (VCRA) framework, which has governed crypto oversight in the state since 2022. Regulators Signal Broader Impact Market observers say the notice is less about new rules and more about clarifying expectations. By formalizing the role of blockchain analytics in traditional finance, New York is reinforcing the idea that banks cannot treat crypto exposure as a niche concern. Analysts also believe the approach could ripple beyond New York. Federal agencies and regulators in other states may view the guidance as a blueprint for aligning banking oversight with the realities of digital asset adoption. For institutions, failure to adopt blockchain intelligence tools may invite regulatory scrutiny and undermine their ability to safeguard customer trust. With crypto now firmly embedded in global finance, New York’s stance suggests that blockchain analytics are no longer optional for banks — they are essential to protecting the financial system’s integrity.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 08:49