Why a $75K Liquidity Test Still Has the Highest Probability! Strong trends don’t break on bad news. They correct when good news stops working. Right nowWhy a $75K Liquidity Test Still Has the Highest Probability! Strong trends don’t break on bad news. They correct when good news stops working. Right now

Bitcoin’s Most Uncomfortable Reality in 2025

2025/12/17 16:32

Why a $75K Liquidity Test Still Has the Highest Probability!

Strong trends don’t break on bad news.
They correct when good news stops working.

Right now, good news isn’t working.

The Narrative Everyone Is Celebrating

  • Multiple Fed rate cuts
  • T-Bill liquidity programs restarting
  • Institutions publicly accumulating
  • Long-term Bitcoin thesis still intact

Yet Bitcoin can’t sustain upside.

That disconnect is not bullish confirmation.
It’s a liquidity signal.

What Price Is Actually Saying

  • BTC is accepted near $87K → post-distribution value
  • Repeated failure to reclaim prior highs
  • Demand is passive, supply is comfortable selling strength
  • Price is not trending, it’s searching

Invalidation:
Only a weekly close above $95,700 negates this structure.

Until then, downside exploration might remains active.

The $75K Zone Is Not Fear — It’s Function

  • High-probability liquidity band: $72K–$78K
  • Volume-weighted equilibrium: ~$76,150
  • This is not a crash call
  • This is where real demand must prove itself
  • Liquidity comes before continuation. Always.

Volume Exposes the Truth

4H execution is consistent:

  • Sell volume expands on downside
  • Buy volume contracts on rebounds
  • Rallies stall quickly
  • Selling accelerates into optimism

This is not panic selling.
This is controlled distribution.

Big players are using bullish narratives as liquidity.

Multi-Timeframe Alignment (Why This Matters)

Weekly

  • Macro uptrend intact
  • Momentum rolling over → normal cycle reset

Daily

  • Lower highs.
  • Failed value reclaim.
  • Momentum shifting negative.

4H

  • Weak absorption.
  • Fast downside legs.
  • Sellers control rebounds.

This is correction within a bull market, not a bear market.

Fed Cuts & T-Bills: The Timing Trap

  • Rate cuts ≠ instant risk-on.
  • Early easing phases often bring volatility, not expansion.
  • T-Bills are long-term bullish.
  • Short-term, they absorb liquidity before releasing it.
  • Liquidity is coming.
    It just hasn’t reached spot demand yet.

Institutional Buying ≠ Immediate Support

  • Long-term allocators buy patiently.
  • They don’t defend short-term structure.
  • Price weakness despite known buyers is the signal.

Accumulation without marginal demand usually precedes:
Lower-liquidity price discovery

The Only Question That Matters

Not:

But:

That answer defines the next leg.

Final Probability Map

  • Volume → distribution
  • Structure → downside exploration
  • Liquidity → patience

Until invalidated by a weekly close above $95,700:
➡️ $75K remains the highest-probability liquidity test before continuation

Markets don’t move on belief.
They move on liquidity.

Closing Thoughts

What do you think will happen when Bitcoin tests the $75K liquidity zone? Drop your thoughts in the comments , the smartest conversations often happen before price moves.

Bitcoin Magazine Nic Carter CoinDesk Messari


Bitcoin’s Most Uncomfortable Reality in 2025 was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.