The Financial Stability Oversight Council's (FSOC) 2025 annual report dropped digital assets from its list of financial-system vulnerabilities, ending three yearsThe Financial Stability Oversight Council's (FSOC) 2025 annual report dropped digital assets from its list of financial-system vulnerabilities, ending three years

Digital assets have vanished from government “vulnerability” list, officially ending a three-year regulatory chokehold on US banks

The Financial Stability Oversight Council's (FSOC) 2025 annual report dropped digital assets from its list of financial-system vulnerabilities, ending three years of high-alert posture that framed crypto as a budding contagion channel requiring new legislation and cautious bank supervision.

The word “vulnerability” disappeared from the table of contents entirely. Digital assets moved into a neutral “significant market developments to monitor” category, described not as systemic threats but as a growing sector with increasing institutional participation through spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs and tokenization of traditional assets.

The shift is structural, not cosmetic. FSOC's 2022 report under former President Joe Biden's Executive Order 14067 concluded that “crypto-asset activities could pose risks to the stability of the US financial system” and called for fresh legislation on spot markets and stablecoins.

The 2024 report classed digital assets under vulnerabilities and warned that dollar stablecoins “continue to represent a potential risk to financial stability because they are acutely vulnerable to runs” without bank-like prudential standards.

The 2025 report reverses that framing, explicitly noting that US regulators have “withdrawn previous broad warnings” to financial institutions about crypto involvement and suggesting that the growth of dollar stablecoins will likely support the dollar's international role over the next decade.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's cover letter redefines FSOC's mission, arguing that cataloguing vulnerabilities “is not sufficient” and that long-term economic growth is integral to financial stability.

Bitcoin heads into 2026 with the US macroprudential gatekeeper stepping back from systemic-risk language just as ETF channels, bank plumbing, and stablecoin rails are being formalized.

Parallel moves that make this policy, not rhetoric

Three 2025 shifts confirm that the reversal is coordinated across agencies, not isolated to a single report.

First, the White House pivot. President Donald Trump's Executive Order 14178 revoked Biden's crypto EO and set explicit policy “to support the responsible growth and use of digital assets” while banning a US central bank digital currency.

The follow-on Digital Assets Report reads as an industrial policy, emphasizing tokenization, stablecoins, and US leadership rather than containment.

Second, Congress provided the regulatory framework FSOC had demanded. The GENIUS Act, signed in July 2025, creates “permitted payment stablecoin issuers,” requires 100% backing, and grants primary oversight to the Fed, the OCC, the FDIC, and state regulators.

That gives FSOC grounds to stop treating stablecoins as unregulated systemic threats and instead monitor them as supervised dollar infrastructure with specific run and illicit-finance risks.

Third, bank re-engagement is being unclogged at the agency level. In January 2025, the SEC rescinded SAB 121 via SAB 122, removing guidance that required custodial crypto assets to be recorded on banks' balance sheets as liabilities.

The OCC issued Interpretive Letter 1188, allowing national banks to act as intermediaries in “riskless principal” crypto transactions, simultaneously buying from one customer and selling to another without open positions.

Separate OCC guidance permits banks to hold small amounts of native tokens to pay gas fees for custody or stablecoin operations. The OCC then granted preliminary national trust bank charters to Circle, Ripple, BitGo, Paxos, and Fidelity Digital Assets, allowing them to operate as federally supervised trust banks.

FSOC's statutory role adds weight to the timing. Congressional Research Service guidance notes that each council member must either attest that “all reasonable steps to address systemic risk are being taken” or explain what more is needed in the annual report.

When that report stops calling digital assets a vulnerability, the same year SAB 121 is rescinded, a stablecoin law is enacted, and the OCC opens doors to crypto-native banks, it signals coordinated de-escalation rather than isolated messaging.

YearHow FSOC classified crypto / digital assetsKey language / toneMain source
2022Explicit financial-stability risk & “priority area”FSOC’s 2022 Annual Report says it “identified digital assets as a priority area” and points to the separate
“Report on Digital Asset Financial Stability Risks and Regulation,” which lays out “potential vulnerabilities
to the financial system” from crypto and recommends new authorities for spot markets and stablecoins.
2022 Annual Report
2023Listed as a named “financial stability vulnerability”Treasury’s release on the 2023 Annual Report says: “Digital Assets: The Council notes that financial stability
vulnerabilities may arise from crypto-asset price volatility, the market’s high use of leverage, the level
of interconnectedness within the industry, operational risks, and the risk of runs on crypto-asset platforms
and stablecoins,” also citing token-concentration and cyber risk.
2023 Annual Report
2024Still a risk to monitor; stablecoins flagged as potential systemic riskIn the 2024 Annual Report release, FSOC writes: “Digital Assets: The Council continues to monitor risks related
to crypto assets. Though the market value of the crypto-asset ecosystem remains small compared with traditional
financial markets, it has continued to grow. Absent appropriate risk-management standards, stablecoins
represent a potential risk to financial stability because of their vulnerability to runs.”
2024 Annual Report
2025No longer listed as a “vulnerability”; neutral/monitoring toneThe 2025 Annual Report drops the “vulnerabilities” section entirely. Coverage notes that digital assets are no
longer described as a hazard area; instead the report “does not offer recommendations regarding digital assets
nor express explicit concerns,” and mainly recounts how regulators have withdrawn broad crypto warnings, while
only flagging stablecoins in an illicit-finance subsection. Bessent’s letter reframes FSOC’s mission around
growth rather than risk-spotting.
2025 Annual Report

What remains cautious

Global watchdogs have not followed FSOC's lead. The Financial Stability Board's October 2025 review noted crypto's global market cap roughly doubled to $4 trillion and warned of “significant gaps” and “fragmented, inconsistent” implementation of its 2023 crypto standards.

The FSB judges financial stability risks “limited at present” but rising with interconnection and stablecoin use.

The Financial Action Task Force's June 2025 update flagged that only 40 of 138 jurisdictions are “largely compliant” with its crypto anti-money-laundering rules and pointed to tens of billions in illicit flows, arguing that failures in one jurisdiction create global consequences.

Even FSOC's 2025 report maintains that dollar stablecoins can be abused for sanctions evasion and illicit finance, calling for continued monitoring and enforcement.

The de-escalation applies to systemic-risk framing, not to AML or sanctions compliance.

Implications for Bitcoin in 2026

FSOC's decision to drop “vulnerability” language removes macroprudential stigma that made large banks, insurers, and pension funds wary of crypto exposure beyond indirect holdings.

It does not mandate Bitcoin allocations, but it lowers the likelihood that new systemically important financial institution rules or blunt supervisory guidance will choke off ETF, custody, or lending channels in the name of systemic risk.

The SEC's spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF approvals in 2024, combined with the queue of additional crypto ETF filings in 2025, normalized listed exposure to BTC at an institutional scale.

FSOC's new tone treats those ETFs as a market structure to monitor rather than a contagion channel requiring caps.

The GENIUS Act and OCC's riskless-principal guidance give US-regulated banks a cleaner legal path to operate in the plumbing layer: holding stablecoin reserves, intermediating flows between BTC ETFs and stablecoin rails, and tokenizing collateral.

That infrastructure is the channel through which Bitcoin's macro-asset role scales in 2026, not because FSOC endorses BTC, but because systemic-risk concerns are being replaced by standard prudential and AML oversight.

The policy shift does not immunize Bitcoin from political swings. Congress could revisit market-structure rules. The SEC and CFTC continue to dispute jurisdiction over tokens other than Bitcoin or Ethereum.

Global regulators warn that crypto-traditional linkages may pose real stability issues if the market keeps doubling. FATF and FSB reports suggest that international coordination on AML and cross-border flows will tighten regardless of the US de-escalation of systemic risk.

The risk for Bitcoin in 2026 has shifted from outright prohibition toward policy whiplash.

FSOC's reversal opens institutional channels just as election-year politics could disrupt them. The council's willingness to downgrade crypto from “vulnerability” to “development” reflects confidence that existing supervisory tools can handle current exposures.

That confidence holds as long as spot ETF flows remain orderly, stablecoin issuers maintain full backing, and no major custody or bridge failure forces regulators to revisit whether crypto's integration into traditional finance has outpaced oversight capacity.

Bitcoin enters 2026 with a regulatory permission structure in place.

The test is whether that structure survives the next stress event or whether FSOC's “significant development to monitor” language proves to be a placeholder that reverts to “vulnerability” the moment something breaks.

The post Digital assets have vanished from government “vulnerability” list, officially ending a three-year regulatory chokehold on US banks appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Market Opportunity
Talus Logo
Talus Price(US)
$0.01284
$0.01284$0.01284
+4.64%
USD
Talus (US) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Visa Expands USDC Stablecoin Settlement For US Banks

Visa Expands USDC Stablecoin Settlement For US Banks

The post Visa Expands USDC Stablecoin Settlement For US Banks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visa Expands USDC Stablecoin Settlement For US Banks
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/17 15:23
Nasdaq Company Adds 7,500 BTC in Bold Treasury Move

Nasdaq Company Adds 7,500 BTC in Bold Treasury Move

The live-streaming and e-commerce company has struck a deal to acquire 7,500 BTC, instantly becoming one of the largest public […] The post Nasdaq Company Adds 7,500 BTC in Bold Treasury Move appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 02:15
Curve Finance votes on revenue-sharing model for CRV holders

Curve Finance votes on revenue-sharing model for CRV holders

The post Curve Finance votes on revenue-sharing model for CRV holders appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Curve Finance has proposed a new protocol called Yield Basis that would share revenue directly with CRV holders, marking a shift from one-off incentives to sustainable income. Summary Curve Finance has put forward a revenue-sharing protocol to give CRV holders sustainable income beyond emissions and fees. The plan would mint $60M in crvUSD to seed three Bitcoin liquidity pools (WBTC, cbBTC, tBTC), with 35–65% of revenue distributed to veCRV stakers. The DAO vote runs from up to Sept. 24, with the proposal seen as a major step to strengthen CRV tokenomics after past liquidity and governance challenges. Curve Finance founder Michael Egorov has introduced a proposal to give CRV token holders a more direct way to earn income, launching a system called Yield Basis that aims to turn the governance token into a sustainable, yield-bearing asset.  The proposal has been published on the Curve DAO (CRV) governance forum, with voting open until Sept. 24. A new model for CRV rewards Yield Basis is designed to distribute transparent and consistent returns to CRV holders who lock their tokens for veCRV governance rights. Unlike past incentive programs, which relied heavily on airdrops and emissions, the protocol channels income from Bitcoin-focused liquidity pools directly back to token holders. To start, Curve would mint $60 million worth of crvUSD, its over-collateralized stablecoin, with proceeds allocated across three pools — WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC — each capped at $10 million. 25% of Yield Basis tokens would be reserved for the Curve ecosystem, and between 35% and 65% of Yield Basis’s revenue would be given to veCRV holders. By emphasizing Bitcoin (BTC) liquidity and offering yields without the short-term loss risks associated with automated market makers, the protocol hopes to draw in professional traders and institutions. Context and potential impact on Curve Finance The proposal comes as Curve continues to modify…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 14:37