The post Re7 Labs threatens whistleblower over exposure to yield vault collapse appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Risk “curator” Re7 Labs has sent a cease and desist letter to a “whistleblower,” via its legal representative Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP. The letter comes in response to accusations that Re7 Labs failed in its responsibility for managing risk in certain vaults. Depositors to these vaults were exposed to last month’s Stream Finance collapse and the subsequent domino-effect that hit similar projects.  The allegations refer to Re7 Labs’ actions before, during, and after the collapse.  The “whistleblower” contacted Protos Leaks on behalf of a group of affected depositors who claim to have lost money lending into Re7 Labs’ tether (USDT) market on Euler Finance, a DeFi lending platform. The allegations In their tip, the whistleblower specifically lists as Re7 Labs’ failings: Asset selection and LTV configuration Monitoring abnormal borrowing or concentration risk Restricting borrowing during suspicious activity Executing liquidations or parameter changes when collateral deteriorates Incident disclosure and communication with users and partners Re7 Labs has taken issue with a previous report, which was forwarded to media outlets and requested the suspension of the fund’s (ultimately unsuccessful) nomination for the HFM European Performance Awards. The report, which also extended to other firms, described an “attacker” borrowing large quantities of USD1 and USDT against USDX. Later, a series of large USDX sales “intentionally” crashed USDX’s price, depleting on-chain liquidity and causing liquidation of the collateral to fail. The funds were allegedly sourced from addresses linked to Stables Labs, the issuer of USDX. It also slams Euler Finance, which it claims “failed to implement safeguards,” and Binance, which was “allegedly unresponsive to requests from victims to freeze” the proceeds. Read more: High yields to haircuts: Has DeFi learned anything from yield vault collapse? The response A representative of Re7 Labs told Protos that the allegations are “serious, inaccurate and unsubstantiated, and… The post Re7 Labs threatens whistleblower over exposure to yield vault collapse appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Risk “curator” Re7 Labs has sent a cease and desist letter to a “whistleblower,” via its legal representative Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP. The letter comes in response to accusations that Re7 Labs failed in its responsibility for managing risk in certain vaults. Depositors to these vaults were exposed to last month’s Stream Finance collapse and the subsequent domino-effect that hit similar projects.  The allegations refer to Re7 Labs’ actions before, during, and after the collapse.  The “whistleblower” contacted Protos Leaks on behalf of a group of affected depositors who claim to have lost money lending into Re7 Labs’ tether (USDT) market on Euler Finance, a DeFi lending platform. The allegations In their tip, the whistleblower specifically lists as Re7 Labs’ failings: Asset selection and LTV configuration Monitoring abnormal borrowing or concentration risk Restricting borrowing during suspicious activity Executing liquidations or parameter changes when collateral deteriorates Incident disclosure and communication with users and partners Re7 Labs has taken issue with a previous report, which was forwarded to media outlets and requested the suspension of the fund’s (ultimately unsuccessful) nomination for the HFM European Performance Awards. The report, which also extended to other firms, described an “attacker” borrowing large quantities of USD1 and USDT against USDX. Later, a series of large USDX sales “intentionally” crashed USDX’s price, depleting on-chain liquidity and causing liquidation of the collateral to fail. The funds were allegedly sourced from addresses linked to Stables Labs, the issuer of USDX. It also slams Euler Finance, which it claims “failed to implement safeguards,” and Binance, which was “allegedly unresponsive to requests from victims to freeze” the proceeds. Read more: High yields to haircuts: Has DeFi learned anything from yield vault collapse? The response A representative of Re7 Labs told Protos that the allegations are “serious, inaccurate and unsubstantiated, and…

Re7 Labs threatens whistleblower over exposure to yield vault collapse

Risk “curator” Re7 Labs has sent a cease and desist letter to a “whistleblower,” via its legal representative Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.

The letter comes in response to accusations that Re7 Labs failed in its responsibility for managing risk in certain vaults.

Depositors to these vaults were exposed to last month’s Stream Finance collapse and the subsequent domino-effect that hit similar projects. 

The allegations refer to Re7 Labs’ actions before, during, and after the collapse. 

The “whistleblower” contacted Protos Leaks on behalf of a group of affected depositors who claim to have lost money lending into Re7 Labs’ tether (USDT) market on Euler Finance, a DeFi lending platform.

The allegations

In their tip, the whistleblower specifically lists as Re7 Labs’ failings:

  • Asset selection and LTV configuration
  • Monitoring abnormal borrowing or concentration risk
  • Restricting borrowing during suspicious activity
  • Executing liquidations or parameter changes when collateral deteriorates
  • Incident disclosure and communication with users and partners

Re7 Labs has taken issue with a previous report, which was forwarded to media outlets and requested the suspension of the fund’s (ultimately unsuccessful) nomination for the HFM European Performance Awards.

The report, which also extended to other firms, described an “attacker” borrowing large quantities of USD1 and USDT against USDX.

Later, a series of large USDX sales “intentionally” crashed USDX’s price, depleting on-chain liquidity and causing liquidation of the collateral to fail. The funds were allegedly sourced from addresses linked to Stables Labs, the issuer of USDX.

It also slams Euler Finance, which it claims “failed to implement safeguards,” and Binance, which was “allegedly unresponsive to requests from victims to freeze” the proceeds.

Read more: High yields to haircuts: Has DeFi learned anything from yield vault collapse?

The response

A representative of Re7 Labs told Protos that the allegations are “serious, inaccurate and unsubstantiated, and distract from the ongoing legal process and genuine recovery efforts.”

It insists that “responsibility lies with Stream Finance and/or Stables Labs” and that, as a “fellow lender,” it has “also suffered losses.”

The cease and desist letter, seen by Protos, denies any “wrongdoing, misconduct, or breach of any legal or other obligation… in the strongest possible terms.”

As well as the cease and desist demand, the letter also requests a “formal written apology” and corrective statement, confirmation of identity, and the deletion of messages containing the allegations.

Neither response directly addresses the specific claims made by the whistleblower, however. 

Protos sent a follow-up pushing for a response to the specific accusations around collateral selection, and awareness of “abnormal” borrowing, but hasn’t yet received a reply.

Read more: David Sacks sends silly legal threat to the New York Times

Yield vault armageddon

In late October, concerns over a “daisy chain of circular lending” began to circulate among DeFi yield farmers.

Then, on November 4, Stream Finance announced a loss of $93 million, triggering a scramble to withdraw and unwind risky positions across the DeFi yield vault ecosystem.

As confidence in vault tokens such as Stream’s xUSD, Elixir’s deUSD and Stables Labs USDX evaporated, a mass depegging followed.

The tokens had been widely used as collateral to borrow mainstream stablecoins. Along with the collateral’s value, borrowers’ incentive to repay their loans also evaporated.

Some users feel that lending platforms and vault ‘curators’ didn’t do enough to protect depositors, and that risks were opaque. Receipt tokens for stablecoin vaults, many with USD in the name, were seen as pseudo-stablecoins generating yield from “delta-neutral” strategies.

Read more: Stream Finance meltdown: winners and losers in DeFi ‘risk curator’ reckoning

Ultimately, as we saw last cycle, generating high yields on stablecoin deposits requires risky levels of leverage.

Previous statements from Re7 Labs have indicated at least $27 million of exposure to depegged assets deUSD and USDX.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source: https://protos.com/re7-labs-threatens-whistleblower-over-exposure-to-yield-vault-collapse/

Market Opportunity
Octavia Logo
Octavia Price(VIA)
$0.0016605
$0.0016605$0.0016605
-8.86%
USD
Octavia (VIA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Thunderclap Review 2026: Is it the Best Social Media Service for Instant Gains?

Thunderclap Review 2026: Is it the Best Social Media Service for Instant Gains?

TLDR: Is Thunderclap legit? Yes, Thunderclap is a legitimate social media growth service designed to help users increase their followers, engagement, and overall
Share
AI Journal2026/02/20 21:10
The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The post The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Healthy competition drives innovation and better products for consumers; it is at the center of American economic leadership. Unfortunately, now that the bipartisan GENIUS Act has been signed into law, major legacy financial institutions seem to be having second thoughts about the innovations that stablecoins can bring to financial markets. Bank lobbying groups and public affairs teams have been peppering Congress with complaints about the law, urging members to reopen debate and introduce changes to the legislation that will ensure the stablecoin market doesn’t grow too quickly, protecting banks’ profits and stifling consumer choice. This reactionary response is both overblown and unnecessary. What legacy financial firms should do instead is embrace competition and offer exciting new products and services that consumers want, not try to kneecap emerging players through anti-innovation rules and regulations. The GENIUS Act was carefully designed with a thorough bipartisan process to strengthen consumer safeguards, ensure regulatory oversight, and preserve financial stability. Efforts to roll back its provisions are less about protecting families and more about protecting entrenched banking interests from the competition that helps ensure the U.S. banking system stays the strongest and most innovative in the world. Critics warn that allowing stablecoins to provide rewards could lead to massive deposit outflows from community banks, with figures as high as $6.6 trillion cited. But closer examination shows this fear is unfounded. A July 2025 analysis by consulting firm Charles River Associates found no statistically significant relationship between stablecoin adoption and community bank deposit outflows. In fact, the overwhelming majority of stablecoin reserves remain in the traditional financial system — either in commercial bank accounts or in short-term Treasuries — where they continue to support liquidity and credit in the broader U.S. economy. The dire estimates rely on unrealistic assumptions that every dollar of stablecoin issuance permanently…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:39
What next for XRP as volatility sinks to 2024 lows

What next for XRP as volatility sinks to 2024 lows

Markets Share Share this article
Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail
What next for XRP as volatility sinks to 202
Share
Coindesk2026/02/20 21:08