A new on-chain report from Lookonchain has reignited debate around Pump.fun’s treasury activity. But the team behind the memecoin launchpad is openly rejecting the claims, calling the circulating numbers “misinformation” and insisting the large transfers reflect internal treasury management, not cash-outs. Lookonchain’s report surfaced major USDC and SOL outflows over the last year, sparking speculation [...]A new on-chain report from Lookonchain has reignited debate around Pump.fun’s treasury activity. But the team behind the memecoin launchpad is openly rejecting the claims, calling the circulating numbers “misinformation” and insisting the large transfers reflect internal treasury management, not cash-outs. Lookonchain’s report surfaced major USDC and SOL outflows over the last year, sparking speculation [...]

Pump.fun Pushes Back Against Lookonchain Claims as Treasury Movements Trigger Debate

2025/11/25 15:07

A new on-chain report from Lookonchain has reignited debate around Pump.fun’s treasury activity.

But the team behind the memecoin launchpad is openly rejecting the claims, calling the circulating numbers “misinformation” and insisting the large transfers reflect internal treasury management, not cash-outs.

Lookonchain’s report surfaced major USDC and SOL outflows over the last year, sparking speculation across X. Pump.fun quickly responded, denying any wrongdoing and arguing that the movements stem from reorganizing treasury funds raised during the PUMP ICO.

The conflicting narratives are now driving one of the platform’s biggest transparency tests to date.

Lookonchain Reports Over $1B in Combined USDC + SOL Movements

Lookonchain’s thread presents a detailed breakdown of on-chain activity involving Pump.fun wallets. The core claims:

436.5M USDC sent to Kraken since October 15

Between October 15 and today, Lookonchain tracked 436.5M USDC flowing from Pump.fun-linked wallets into Kraken.

The on-chain flow also showed:

  •  537.6M USDC leaving Kraken and moving into Circle through wallet DTQK7G
  •  A nearly matching inflow/outflow pattern that raised questions around whether Pump.fun was off-ramping proceeds

Lookonchain framed the activity as part of a broader pattern of exchange deposits and potential cash-outs.

4.19M SOL sold between May 2024 and August 2025

The report also highlighted long-term SOL selling:

4.19M SOL sold in total since May 19, 2024

Valued at $757M at an average price of $181

Of that:

264,373 SOL was sold directly on-chain (~$41.64M)

3.93M SOL (~$715.5M) was deposited into Kraken

This multi-year accumulation of transactions intensified concerns that Pump.fun has been liquidating assets steadily.

The thread triggered immediate reactions across X, from curiosity to outright FUD, partly fueled by its precise numbers and the size of the movements.

Pump.fun Responds: “This Is Misinformation”

Pump.fun publicly rejected Lookonchain’s interpretation.

In multiple posts, the team stated that:

  •  The USDC movements were part of internal treasury management
  •  The funds originated from the PUMP ICO
  •  Transfers involved reorganizing liquidity across wallets
  •  The platform has never worked directly with Circle, despite the flows Lookonchain connected to Circle-related wallets
  •  No evidence supports the idea of coordinated off-ramps or cash-outs by the founders

The team’s position is clear: the transactions represent corporate bookkeeping, not dumping.

Pump.fun emphasized that the company is actively managing its “runway,” reallocating USDC to support growth, operations, and business reinvestment.

They called Lookonchain’s framing inaccurate and misleading, sparking debate over how much on-chain analysis can infer about corporate treasury behavior.

A Closer Look at Treasury Management Claims

Pump.fun’s defense hinges on one central explanation:

The USDC from the PUMP ICO is being moved across internal wallets as part of structured treasury management.

The team provided additional context:

1. Funds were reorganized across multiple treasury wallets

The USDC wasn’t withdrawn into cash, according to Pump.fun, but redistributed for operational planning and financial management.

2. No direct relationship with Circle

While Lookonchain identified USDC eventually reaching Circle’s mint/burn pathways, Pump.fun insists those flows do not imply a business relationship.

Many large exchanges routinely use Circle for settlement.

Kraken → Circle flows do not necessarily indicate Pump.fun’s involvement beyond depositing to Kraken.

3. Treasury tokens from the ICO are being used for runway

Pump.fun states the PUMP ICO raised significant capital, and that treasury diversification is part of long-term sustainability.

They argue it is normal for companies to:

  •  Move funds between wallets
  •  Rebalance holdings
  •  Use centralized exchanges for treasury operations
  •  And adjust capital allocations year-to-year

The team’s stance is that nothing in the transactions signals mismanagement or off-ramping.

Why the Report Triggered FUD So Quickly

The crypto space reacts fast, especially when a thread highlights millions moving through exchanges.

Three factors drove the rapid bearish sentiment:

  • Large Numbers

Seeing $436M USDC and 4.19M SOL tied to one protocol creates immediate alarm, regardless of context.

  • Kraken Deposits

In the industry’s eyes, CEX deposits often equal “preparing to sell.”

The nuance behind treasury management rarely reaches the same virality.

  • SOL Sales Timeline

The SOL sales span over a year, but were summarized in one thread, amplifying the shock.

Together, these points created a narrative that Pump.fun was “cashing out,” even before the team responded.

Ongoing Debate: Transparency vs. Interpretation

This situation illustrates a recurring tension in crypto:

  • On-chain data shows what happens.
  • But it doesn’t always show why it happens.
  • Lookonchain’s report is precise in tracking transactions.

But Pump.fun argues the interpretation misses internal context.

This raises several questions:

  •  Should protocols proactively disclose treasury management updates?
  •  Should analysts label findings more cautiously when intent is unknown?
  •  Should treasury wallets be publicly flagged to avoid misinterpretation?
  •  How should projects communicate large movements without triggering community panic?

These debates will likely continue as protocols grow more sophisticated and their treasuries scale.

Pump.fun hasn’t announced further clarification, but several things are likely:

1. More transparency

After this level of scrutiny, protocols often publish updated treasury overviews or dashboards.

2. Continuous monitoring

Analysts on X will keep watching Kraken-linked wallets for any new deposits or sales.

3. Community stabilization

The initial wave of FUD is cooling as the team’s explanation circulates.

Market sentiment typically normalizes once context becomes clearer.

4. Growth still accelerating

Despite the noise, Pump.fun remains one of the most active platforms in Solana’s ecosystem, powering tens of thousands of launches monthly.

Treasury events rarely slow activity unless tied to confirmed misconduct, and there is no evidence of that here.

Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.

Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news!

Market Opportunity
pump.fun Logo
pump.fun Price(PUMP)
$0.001928
$0.001928$0.001928
-5.30%
USD
pump.fun (PUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam

U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam

The post U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crime 18 September 2025 | 04:05 A Colorado judge has brought closure to one of the state’s most unusual cryptocurrency scandals, declaring INDXcoin to be a fraudulent operation and ordering its founders, Denver pastor Eli Regalado and his wife Kaitlyn, to repay $3.34 million. The ruling, issued by District Court Judge Heidi L. Kutcher, came nearly two years after the couple persuaded hundreds of people to invest in their token, promising safety and abundance through a Christian-branded platform called the Kingdom Wealth Exchange. The scheme ran between June 2022 and April 2023 and drew in more than 300 participants, many of them members of local church networks. Marketing materials portrayed INDXcoin as a low-risk gateway to prosperity, yet the project unraveled almost immediately. The exchange itself collapsed within 24 hours of launch, wiping out investors’ money. Despite this failure—and despite an auditor’s damning review that gave the system a “0 out of 10” for security—the Regalados kept presenting it as a solid opportunity. Colorado regulators argued that the couple’s faith-based appeal was central to the fraud. Securities Commissioner Tung Chan said the Regalados “dressed an old scam in new technology” and used their standing within the Christian community to convince people who had little knowledge of crypto. For him, the case illustrates how modern digital assets can be exploited to replicate classic Ponzi-style tactics under a different name. Court filings revealed where much of the money ended up: luxury goods, vacations, jewelry, a Range Rover, high-end clothing, and even dental procedures. In a video that drew worldwide attention earlier this year, Eli Regalado admitted the funds had been spent, explaining that a portion went to taxes while the remainder was used for a home renovation he claimed was divinely inspired. The judgment not only confirms that INDXcoin qualifies as a…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:14
MSCI’s Proposal May Trigger $15B Crypto Outflows

MSCI’s Proposal May Trigger $15B Crypto Outflows

MSCI's plan to exclude crypto-treasury companies could cause $15B outflows, impacting major firms.
Share
CoinLive2025/12/19 13:17
This U.S. politician’s suspicious stock trade just returned over 200% in weeks

This U.S. politician’s suspicious stock trade just returned over 200% in weeks

The post This U.S. politician’s suspicious stock trade just returned over 200% in weeks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. United States Representative Cloe Fields has seen his stake in Opendoor Technologies (NASDAQ: OPEN) stock return over 200% in just a matter of weeks. According to congressional trade filings, the lawmaker purchased a stake in the online real estate company on July 21, 2025, investing between $1,001 and $15,000. At the time, the stock was trading around $2 and had been largely stagnant for months. Receive Signals on US Congress Members’ Stock Trades Stocks Stay up-to-date on the trading activity of US Congress members. The signal triggers based on updates from the House disclosure reports, notifying you of their latest stock transactions. Enable signal The trade has since paid off, with Opendoor surging to $10, a gain of nearly 220% in under two months. By comparison, the broader S&P 500 index rose less than 5% during the same period. OPEN one-week stock price chart. Source: Finbold Assuming he invested a minimum of $1,001, the purchase would now be worth about $3,200, while a $15,000 stake would have grown to nearly $48,000, generating profits of roughly $2,200 and $33,000, respectively. OPEN’s stock rally Notably, Opendoor’s rally has been fueled by major corporate shifts and market speculation. For instance, in August, the company named former Shopify COO Kaz Nejatian as CEO, while co-founders Keith Rabois and Eric Wu rejoined the board, moves seen as a return to the company’s early innovative spirit.  Outgoing CEO Carrie Wheeler’s resignation and sale of millions in stock reinforced the sense of a new chapter. Beyond leadership changes, Opendoor’s surge has taken on meme-stock characteristics. In this case, retail investors piled in as shares climbed, while short sellers scrambled to cover, pushing prices higher.  However, the stock is still not without challenges, where its iBuying model is untested at scale, margins are thin, and debt tied to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:02