Author: fabiano.sol Compiled by: Tim, PANews There are over a dozen projects on Solana that are currently undergoing buybacks, but: Who is conducting 100% buybacks? Who destroys the tokens after the buyback? A complete guide to Solana's ecosystem buyback program. 1.deBridge deBridge is using 100% of its revenue to buy back its own tokens, and the specific handling plan after the buyback is yet to be announced. To date, they have repurchased 3% of the token supply. At this rate, they will be able to repurchase nearly 20% of the circulating supply within a year. 2. Marinede Marinade uses 50% of its monthly revenue to buy back MNDE tokens. Marinade boasts an annualized revenue of $170 million, which could generate significant buying interest for a token with a market capitalization of only $140 million. The future use of these repurchased tokens will be determined by the DAO. 3. Jupiter Jupiter is using 50% of its protocol revenue to buy back its own tokens. They transferred the repurchased tokens to a burn address. To date, Jupiter has repurchased 95 million JUP tokens, representing 1.37% of the total supply. Tomorrow we will discuss a plan for handling the repurchased tokens. 4. Jito The Jito platform will use 1.5% of TipRouter fees to periodically buy back JTO tokens and then burn them. Based on current market prices, this move will result in the repurchase and burning of more than 11 million JTO tokens annually (representing 1.1% of the total supply). 5. Bonk Bonk has introduced several token buyback and burn measures. In this case, I will only focus on LetsBONK. The LetsBONK project will use 50% of its revenue to buy back BONK tokens from the open market and burn them. 6. Metaplex 50% of the protocol's revenue will be allocated to the DAO each month, specifically for MTPLX token buybacks. In the past 30 days, the Metaplex protocol has generated $1.56 million in revenue, of which 50% (i.e., $780,000) was used to buy back approximately 3.5 million MPLX tokens for the Metaplex DAO, representing more than 0.3% of the total supply. 7. Raydium Raydium tokens have an extremely low annual issuance of only 1.9 million (total supply is 555 million). Raydium will use 12% of its transaction fees to buy back RAY tokens. This brings the repurchase ratio to 5% of the current circulating supply. 8. Pump Fun The Pump.fun platform currently generates over $1 million in daily revenue and uses 100% of that revenue to buy back tokens. In September, they bought back $55 million worth of PUMP tokens, which would allow them to buy back approximately 30% of the circulating supply within a year. 9. Streamflow 39% of the Streamflow protocol's revenue is being used to buy back STREAM tokens and distribute them to stakers. Taking July 2025 as an example, this means that 39% of the $247,000 in revenue that month (i.e., $96,330) will be used for STREAM token buybacks and staking reward distributions. Recently, Magic Eden also launched a token buyback mechanism, which has repurchased 111,000 ME tokens and will use them all for staking rewards (the scale is expected to expand further in the future). Step Finance has also invested all of its platform revenue (including revenue from businesses such as Solanafloor and Remora Markets) into token buybacks.Author: fabiano.sol Compiled by: Tim, PANews There are over a dozen projects on Solana that are currently undergoing buybacks, but: Who is conducting 100% buybacks? Who destroys the tokens after the buyback? A complete guide to Solana's ecosystem buyback program. 1.deBridge deBridge is using 100% of its revenue to buy back its own tokens, and the specific handling plan after the buyback is yet to be announced. To date, they have repurchased 3% of the token supply. At this rate, they will be able to repurchase nearly 20% of the circulating supply within a year. 2. Marinede Marinade uses 50% of its monthly revenue to buy back MNDE tokens. Marinade boasts an annualized revenue of $170 million, which could generate significant buying interest for a token with a market capitalization of only $140 million. The future use of these repurchased tokens will be determined by the DAO. 3. Jupiter Jupiter is using 50% of its protocol revenue to buy back its own tokens. They transferred the repurchased tokens to a burn address. To date, Jupiter has repurchased 95 million JUP tokens, representing 1.37% of the total supply. Tomorrow we will discuss a plan for handling the repurchased tokens. 4. Jito The Jito platform will use 1.5% of TipRouter fees to periodically buy back JTO tokens and then burn them. Based on current market prices, this move will result in the repurchase and burning of more than 11 million JTO tokens annually (representing 1.1% of the total supply). 5. Bonk Bonk has introduced several token buyback and burn measures. In this case, I will only focus on LetsBONK. The LetsBONK project will use 50% of its revenue to buy back BONK tokens from the open market and burn them. 6. Metaplex 50% of the protocol's revenue will be allocated to the DAO each month, specifically for MTPLX token buybacks. In the past 30 days, the Metaplex protocol has generated $1.56 million in revenue, of which 50% (i.e., $780,000) was used to buy back approximately 3.5 million MPLX tokens for the Metaplex DAO, representing more than 0.3% of the total supply. 7. Raydium Raydium tokens have an extremely low annual issuance of only 1.9 million (total supply is 555 million). Raydium will use 12% of its transaction fees to buy back RAY tokens. This brings the repurchase ratio to 5% of the current circulating supply. 8. Pump Fun The Pump.fun platform currently generates over $1 million in daily revenue and uses 100% of that revenue to buy back tokens. In September, they bought back $55 million worth of PUMP tokens, which would allow them to buy back approximately 30% of the circulating supply within a year. 9. Streamflow 39% of the Streamflow protocol's revenue is being used to buy back STREAM tokens and distribute them to stakers. Taking July 2025 as an example, this means that 39% of the $247,000 in revenue that month (i.e., $96,330) will be used for STREAM token buybacks and staking reward distributions. Recently, Magic Eden also launched a token buyback mechanism, which has repurchased 111,000 ME tokens and will use them all for staking rewards (the scale is expected to expand further in the future). Step Finance has also invested all of its platform revenue (including revenue from businesses such as Solanafloor and Remora Markets) into token buybacks.

Solana Ecosystem Buyback Guide: Decoding the Buyback Mechanisms and Real Impact of 9 Major Projects

2025/10/30 16:25

Author: fabiano.sol

Compiled by: Tim, PANews

There are over a dozen projects on Solana that are currently undergoing buybacks, but:

  • Who is conducting 100% buybacks?
  • Who destroys the tokens after the buyback?

A complete guide to Solana's ecosystem buyback program.

1.deBridge

deBridge is using 100% of its revenue to buy back its own tokens, and the specific handling plan after the buyback is yet to be announced.

To date, they have repurchased 3% of the token supply. At this rate, they will be able to repurchase nearly 20% of the circulating supply within a year.

2. Marinede

Marinade uses 50% of its monthly revenue to buy back MNDE tokens.

Marinade boasts an annualized revenue of $170 million, which could generate significant buying interest for a token with a market capitalization of only $140 million.

The future use of these repurchased tokens will be determined by the DAO.

3. Jupiter

Jupiter is using 50% of its protocol revenue to buy back its own tokens.

They transferred the repurchased tokens to a burn address. To date, Jupiter has repurchased 95 million JUP tokens, representing 1.37% of the total supply.

Tomorrow we will discuss a plan for handling the repurchased tokens.

4. Jito

The Jito platform will use 1.5% of TipRouter fees to periodically buy back JTO tokens and then burn them.

Based on current market prices, this move will result in the repurchase and burning of more than 11 million JTO tokens annually (representing 1.1% of the total supply).

5. Bonk

Bonk has introduced several token buyback and burn measures.

In this case, I will only focus on LetsBONK.

The LetsBONK project will use 50% of its revenue to buy back BONK tokens from the open market and burn them.

6. Metaplex

50% of the protocol's revenue will be allocated to the DAO each month, specifically for MTPLX token buybacks.

In the past 30 days, the Metaplex protocol has generated $1.56 million in revenue, of which 50% (i.e., $780,000) was used to buy back approximately 3.5 million MPLX tokens for the Metaplex DAO, representing more than 0.3% of the total supply.

7. Raydium

Raydium tokens have an extremely low annual issuance of only 1.9 million (total supply is 555 million).

Raydium will use 12% of its transaction fees to buy back RAY tokens.

This brings the repurchase ratio to 5% of the current circulating supply.

8. Pump Fun

The Pump.fun platform currently generates over $1 million in daily revenue and uses 100% of that revenue to buy back tokens.

In September, they bought back $55 million worth of PUMP tokens, which would allow them to buy back approximately 30% of the circulating supply within a year.

9. Streamflow

39% of the Streamflow protocol's revenue is being used to buy back STREAM tokens and distribute them to stakers.

Taking July 2025 as an example, this means that 39% of the $247,000 in revenue that month (i.e., $96,330) will be used for STREAM token buybacks and staking reward distributions.

Recently, Magic Eden also launched a token buyback mechanism, which has repurchased 111,000 ME tokens and will use them all for staking rewards (the scale is expected to expand further in the future). Step Finance has also invested all of its platform revenue (including revenue from businesses such as Solanafloor and Remora Markets) into token buybacks.

Market Opportunity
RealLink Logo
RealLink Price(REAL)
$0.07369
$0.07369$0.07369
-0.68%
USD
RealLink (REAL) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Let insiders trade – Blockworks

Let insiders trade – Blockworks

The post Let insiders trade – Blockworks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from The Breakdown newsletter. To read more editions, subscribe ​​“The most valuable commodity I know of is information.” — Gordon Gekko, Wall Street Ten months ago, FBI agents raided Shayne Coplan’s Manhattan apartment, ostensibly in search of evidence that the prediction market he founded, Polymarket, had illegally allowed US residents to place bets on the US election. Two weeks ago, the CFTC gave Polymarket the green light to allow those very same US residents to place bets on whatever they like. This is quite the turn of events — and it’s not just about elections or politics. With its US government seal of approval in hand, Polymarket is reportedly raising capital at a valuation of $9 billion — a reflection of the growing belief that prediction markets will be used for much more than betting on elections once every four years. Instead, proponents say prediction markets can provide a real service to the world by providing it with better information about nearly everything. I think they might, too — but only if insiders are free to participate. Yesterday, for example, Polymarket announced new betting markets on company earnings reports, with a promise that it would improve the information that investors have to work with.  Instead of waiting three months to find out how a company is faring, investors could simply watch the odds on Polymarket.  If the probability of an earnings beat is rising, for example, investors would know at a glance that things are going well. But that will only happen if enough of the people betting actually know how things are going. Relying on the wisdom of crowds to magically discern how a business is doing won’t add much incremental knowledge to the world; everyone’s guesses are unlikely to average out to the truth. If…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 05:16
U Mobile and IGB Collaborate on Malaysia’s 5G Indoor Networks

U Mobile and IGB Collaborate on Malaysia’s 5G Indoor Networks

U Mobile partners with IGB Berhad for 5G indoor network deployment across 20 Malaysian properties.
Share
bitcoininfonews2025/12/21 20:20