Solana is facing a potentially important shift in its token economics as validators vote on governance proposals that could reduce the rate at which new SOL enters circulation while significantly incrSolana is facing a potentially important shift in its token economics as validators vote on governance proposals that could reduce the rate at which new SOL enters circulation while significantly incr
Solana Governance Vote Could Boost Daily SOL Burns to $800,000 and Slow Token Issuance
Solana is facing a potentially important shift in its token economics as validators vote on governance proposals that could reduce the rate at which new SOL enters circulation while significantly increasing the amount burned through transaction fees. The changes come as the network continues to expand its activity and debate how much inflation is necessary to support validators.
Two proposals are at the center of the current vote. One would accelerate Solana’s scheduled decline in inflation, while another would introduce a resource-based fee structure that could lift daily SOL burns from roughly 650 tokens to as many as 9,000. At recent prices, that upper estimate translates to approximately $800,000 in SOL burned per day.
The proposals do not automatically make SOL deflationary, but together they could create a considerably tighter supply environment over the coming years.
1.Validators Vote on a New Direction for SOL Supply
Solana validators began voting on three governance proposals on August 23, with the voting period scheduled to run through Thursday, August 27, at approximately 15:30 UTC. Voting power is based on the amount of SOL staked, giving larger amounts of staked SOL greater influence over the outcome.
The supply-focused measures are SGP-0002 and SGP-0003. SGP-0002 is designed to accelerate the network’s existing disinflation schedule, while SGP-0003 proposes changes to transaction fees that would increase the portion of fees permanently removed from circulation.
A third measure, SGP-0001, is different. It would formalize Solana’s governance framework through what the network calls the Solana Constitution and establish the voting infrastructure being used for these decisions.
That makes the current vote notable beyond SOL’s monetary policy. It represents an effort to formalize how major protocol decisions are made while simultaneously deciding on significant changes to the token’s supply dynamics.
2.SGP-0002 Would Accelerate Solana’s Inflation Decline
Under Solana’s existing schedule, the inflation rate declines by 15% each year until reaching a long-term target of 1.5%. SGP-0002 proposes doubling that annual disinflation rate to 30%.
According to the proposal’s authors, this would allow Solana to reach the 1.5% terminal inflation rate in roughly 2.8 years rather than about 5.7 years. The proposal estimates that approximately 18.9 million fewer SOL would be emitted over six years compared with the existing schedule.
The difference is significant because staking rewards are largely tied to newly issued SOL. Faster disinflation would therefore reduce the amount of new tokens distributed through the network’s staking system.
However, lower issuance also comes with trade-offs. The proposal’s modeling indicates that nominal staking yields could fall from around 5.84% to 4.34% in the first year, assuming the proposed schedule is implemented. Smaller validators could also face greater pressure if lower rewards reduce their margins.
In other words, the proposal is not simply about making SOL scarcer. It also changes the economic incentives supporting the network.
3.The Fee Proposal Could Push Daily Burns Toward $800,000
SGP-0003 targets the other side of Solana’s supply equation: tokens already circulating on the network.
The proposal would introduce resource-based transaction fees, meaning the cost of a transaction would be more closely connected to the computational resources it consumes. A portion of the fee would go to the block producer, while another component tied to resource usage would be permanently burned.
That could dramatically increase the amount of SOL destroyed each day.
Current burns are around 650 SOL per day. Under the proposed model, estimates put daily burns between 7,500 and 9,000 SOL. At recent SOL prices, the upper end of that range equates to roughly $846,000 worth of tokens burned each day.
The key point is that the $800,000 figure is an estimate, not a guaranteed daily amount. Actual burns would depend on network activity, transaction demand, SOL’s market price and the amount of computational resources being consumed.
If Solana experiences sustained high activity, however, the mechanism could make network usage more directly connected to SOL’s supply dynamics.
4.Why the Two Measures Matter Together
The most interesting aspect of the proposals is that they approach supply growth from opposite directions.
SGP-0002 would reduce the amount of new SOL entering circulation. SGP-0003 would increase the amount of existing SOL being permanently removed through transaction-related burns.
That combination could materially slow net supply growth.
Still, it would be inaccurate to describe the proposals as an immediate path toward a deflationary SOL. CoinDesk’s analysis found that even 9,000 SOL burned per day would initially be far below Solana’s estimated daily issuance of roughly 60,000 SOL.
This distinction matters for investors and market observers. Burning more SOL does not automatically mean its price will rise. Token prices are also influenced by demand, market liquidity, broader crypto conditions, network adoption and investor sentiment.
The proposals could nevertheless improve SOL’s long-term supply profile by reducing dilution and making network activity more relevant to token economics.
5.What the Vote Could Mean for Solana’s Long-Term Economics
If both supply proposals pass and are implemented, Solana would move toward a lower-emission and higher-burn model.
The accelerated disinflation schedule could bring the 1.5% inflation floor forward to 2029, while the fee changes could substantially increase SOL destruction during periods of heavy network activity. The official proposal estimates that the faster disinflation path alone could reduce emissions by 18.9 million SOL over six years.
There are also potential consequences for validators and stakers. Lower issuance means reduced staking rewards, which could affect the economics of running validators or delegating SOL. At the same time, a healthier relationship between network usage, fees and token supply could make Solana’s economic model more sustainable over the longer term.
The outcome of the vote therefore matters for more than SOL holders. It could influence how validators are compensated, how users pay for network resources and how Solana balances security incentives with supply growth.
6.Conclusion
Solana’s latest governance vote represents a significant test of the network’s future tokenomics. SGP-0002 could accelerate the decline in SOL issuance, while SGP-0003 could increase daily burns from around 650 SOL to as much as 9,000 SOL under high activity.
At current prices, that upper burn estimate is close to $800,000 per day, but it should not be interpreted as a guaranteed figure or an automatic bullish catalyst.
The bigger story is the structural change. By issuing fewer tokens and potentially burning more through network activity, Solana could gradually move toward a tighter supply model. Whether that translates into stronger long-term value will ultimately depend on whether network demand and adoption continue to grow alongside these changes.
Disclaimer:This content is for educational and reference purposes only and does not constitute any investment advice. Digital asset investments carry high risk. Please evaluate carefully and assume full responsibility for your own decisions.
市場の機会
ソラナ価格(SOL)
--
----
USD
ソラナ (SOL) ライブ価格チャート
このページで共有されている記事は公開プラットフォームから収集したものであり、参考情報としてのみ提供されています。MEXCの立場や見解を代表するものではありません。すべての権利は Mubashir に帰属します。第三者の権利を侵害するコンテンツがあると思われる場合は、service@support.mexc.com までご連絡いただければ速やかに削除いたします。MEXCはいかなるコンテンツの正確性、完全性、適時性も保証せず、提供された情報に基づいて取られたいかなる行動についても責任を負いません。本コンテンツは、金融、法律、またはその他の専門的なアドバイスを構成するものではなく、MEXCによる推奨または支持として解釈されるべきものでもありません。専門家の洞察と詳細な分析については、MEXC 学ぶ をご覧ください。
ソラナ についてもっと知る
もっと見る
先物取引に最適な銘柄は？BTCとETHが勝者、ただしその理由は想像とは違います
ほとんどのトレーダーにとって、先物取引に最適な銘柄はBTCまたはETHです。どちらも無期限先物の厚い流動性、狭いスプレッド、そして小型銘柄より安定した資金調達率を兼ね備えています。 次のティアを牽引するのはSOL、XRP、DOGEです。一方、PEPEのようなミームコインは、少額で厳格にリスク管理された戦術的ポジションにのみ適しています。 この6銘柄はすべて、MEXCでUSDT-M無期限先物として取
2026/08/19
Solanaは本当に無料でもらえる？有効な方法とウォレットを空にする罠
多くの「無料Solana」ガイドが明言しない正直な答えは、ゼロから始める場合、実質的な量のメインネットSOLを無料で獲得できる信頼性の高い方法は存在しないということです。 エアドロップ、Learn-to-Earn報酬、紹介報酬など、実際に利用できる方法はあります。しかし、獲得額は小さく、主にすでにSolanaで活動しているユーザーが対象です。また、オンライン上の「無料SOL」オファーの多くは明確な
2026/07/22
Solanaの価格履歴：SOLチャートが示すものと、示していないもの
Solanaはこれまでに2度、史上最高値を記録していますが、この2つにはほとんど共通点がありません。 1回目は2021年11月の約260ドルで、NFTとDeFiの活動によって押し上げられました。 2回目は2025年1月の約294ドルで、ある1つのミームコインに沸いた週末によって押し上げられました。 Solanaの価格履歴を、長く繰り返される1つのサイクルとして読むと、この違いを見落としてしまいます
2026/07/21
ソラナ の最新情報
もっと見る
スポットSOL ETF市場の拡大に伴い、モルガン・スタンレー・ソラナ・トラスト（MSOL）がNYSE Arcaに上場
モルガン・スタンレー・ソラナ・トラスト（ティッカー：MSOL）がNYSE Arcaに上場し、現物SOL ETFの数が9本となり、ソラナエコシステムへの機関投資家のアクセスが深化しました。
2026/07/29
Morgan StanleyがETH・SOL ETFのS-1修正申請：手数料0.14%で業界最安値水準
Morgan StanleyがスポットEthereum TrustとスポットSolana TrustのS-1修正申請を提出し、手数料、カストディアン、ティッカーシンボルに関する情報を開示しました。スポンサー手数料は0.14%で、暗号資産
2026/07/31
暗号資産市場の後退にもかかわらず、Bitcoin、Ethereum、Solanaの検索数が増加
暗号資産の時価総額が下落する中でも、BTC、ETH、SOLに対するGoogle検索の関心は高まっており、価格回復が確定する前に個人投資家の注目が戻りつつあることを示唆しています。
2026/08/03
ホット
現在、市場で大きな注目を集めているトレンドの暗号資産
暗号資産価格
取引高が最も多い暗号資産