BATANGAS Rep. Leandro Antonio L. Leviste on Wednesday rejected blame over the multibillion-peso fine imposed by the Energy department on numerous delayed energyBATANGAS Rep. Leandro Antonio L. Leviste on Wednesday rejected blame over the multibillion-peso fine imposed by the Energy department on numerous delayed energy

Leviste says he did not receive DoE’s P24-B fine notice

BATANGAS Rep. Leandro Antonio L. Leviste on Wednesday rejected blame over the multibillion-peso fine imposed by the Energy department on numerous delayed energy projects, saying the notice was not sent to a company he owned.

Mr. Leviste said the Energy department’s P24-billion fine for delayed projects was sent to SP New Energy Corp. (SPNEC) and not Solar Philippines Power Project Holdings, Inc., but stopped short of saying that SPNEC should shoulder it.

“It was not Solar Philippines Power Project Holdings that received the letter about the said fine, but SP New Energy Corp.,” he said in a media briefing in Filipino. “I can categorically say that none of my companies received a letter stating there was a P24-billion penalty, and that it was SPNEC which received the letter.”

An SPNEC representative, reached for comment, reiterated the company is not liable for the Department of Energy’s (DoE) multibillion-peso penalty.

The dispute over liability arose after Energy Secretary Sharon S. Garin last week said Solar Philippines would be fined for delays in delivering nearly 12,000 megawatts (MW) of renewable energy. The DoE terminated 33 of its service contracts, accounting for around 64% of more than 18,000 MW of potential capacity.

Mr. Leviste said he had paid other fines imposed by the DoE. “We already paid other penalties… just recently… about P70 million.” — Kenneth Christiane L. Basilio

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.000442
$0.000442$0.000442
+1.12%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Stellar (XLM) Price Analysis for February 1

Stellar (XLM) Price Analysis for February 1

The post Stellar (XLM) Price Analysis for February 1 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The crypto market keeps reaching new local lows, according to CoinStats
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/02 05:21
PEPE Price Prediction: Meme Coin Targets Recovery Despite Technical Weakness

PEPE Price Prediction: Meme Coin Targets Recovery Despite Technical Weakness

The post PEPE Price Prediction: Meme Coin Targets Recovery Despite Technical Weakness appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Timothy Morano Feb 01, 2026 16:58
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/02 05:00