OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman and xAI founder Elon Musk exchanged words on the social media platform X, with the latter telling netizens, “not to let their OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman and xAI founder Elon Musk exchanged words on the social media platform X, with the latter telling netizens, “not to let their

Sam Altman clashes with Elon Musk over Tesla and Grok

OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman and xAI founder Elon Musk exchanged words on the social media platform X, with the latter telling netizens, “not to let their loved ones use ChatGPT.” 

According to a report circulating on X, OpenAI’s large language model ChatGPT allegedly contributed to the demise of nine users. Musk took a dig at Sam Altman’s company on Monday, saying the findings were “diabolical.” 

In a response posted on Tuesday, the OpenAI CEO reminded him that he once claimed ChatGPT was excessively restrictive to its userbase and was now blaming it for becoming “too relaxed.”

“Almost a billion people use it, and some of them may be in very fragile mental states. We will continue to do our best to get this right, and we feel a huge responsibility to do the best we can, but these are tragic and complicated situations that deserve to be treated with respect,” Altman wrote.

OpenAI is alleged to have caused five suicidal cases 

According to a BBC report from last October, OpenAI estimated that 0.07% of ChatGPT users active in a given week showed signs of mania, psychosis, or suicidal thoughts. The company also reckoned that 0.15% of users had conversations with explicit indicators of suicidal intent.

OpenAI said it updated the chatbot to recognize and respond “safely and empathetically to signs of delusion or mania.” In his answer to Musk’s allegations, Altman admitted it was genuinely “hard to protect vulnerable users.”

“It is genuinely hard because we need to protect vulnerable users, while also making sure our guardrails still allow all of our users to benefit from our tools,” the CEO surmised.

Musk and Altman co-founded the organization in 2015 as a nonprofit research lab focused on developing artificial intelligence for the public good. Musk left OpenAI’s board in 2018 and later bashed the company for trying to change its non-profitable business structure and its partnership with Microsoft. 

He then created xAI and AI model Grok, which has recently been slammed with legal charges for sexualizing images of minors. “I won’t even start on some of the Grok decisions,” Altman said, insinuating Musk’s product had more problems than ChatGPT.

Since late December 2025, Grok has been responding to prompts to undress people in photographs. xAI issued a statement on January 3, warning “anyone using or prompting Grok to make illegal content,” claiming they would be treated as if they had uploaded illegal content. 

Musk also dismissed the claims that Grok was sexualizing pictures of minors, writing on X: “I am not aware of any naked underage images generated by Grok. Literally zero…Obviously, Grok does not spontaneously generate images; it does so only according to user requests.”

Altman talks Tesla’s safety, electric car autopilot crashes, and deaths

Altman extended his criticism to Musk’s automotive business, Tesla, citing reports of fatal crashes. “Apparently, more than 50 people have died from crashes related to Autopilot. I only ever rode in a car, using it once, some time ago, but my first thought was that it was far from a safe thing for Tesla to have released.”

A late-December Bloomberg report examining fatal crashes in the US identified at least 15 deaths over the past decade, where occupants or rescuers were unable to open Tesla doors after crashes that led to fires. 

The automaker said it was considering engineering changes, including disabling locks automatically when battery voltage drops and releasing doors shortly before battery power is lost. 

Tesla’s design chief told Bloomberg in September that the company was working on a redesign of its door handles to improve electric and manual release prompts. The decision came against the backdrop of a lawsuit in November, when a crash in Wisconsin killed all five occupants of a Model S. 

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Stellar (XLM) Price Analysis for February 1

Stellar (XLM) Price Analysis for February 1

The post Stellar (XLM) Price Analysis for February 1 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The crypto market keeps reaching new local lows, according to CoinStats
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/02 05:21
PEPE Price Prediction: Meme Coin Targets Recovery Despite Technical Weakness

PEPE Price Prediction: Meme Coin Targets Recovery Despite Technical Weakness

The post PEPE Price Prediction: Meme Coin Targets Recovery Despite Technical Weakness appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Timothy Morano Feb 01, 2026 16:58
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/02 05:00