The post FTX-Tied Lawsuit Asks Clients to Weigh in on Potential $10M Settlement appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. One of the class-action lawsuits filed againstThe post FTX-Tied Lawsuit Asks Clients to Weigh in on Potential $10M Settlement appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. One of the class-action lawsuits filed against

FTX-Tied Lawsuit Asks Clients to Weigh in on Potential $10M Settlement

One of the class-action lawsuits filed against the cryptocurrency-friendly Silvergate Bank in California is calling for claimants with ties to FTX or Alameda Research accounts.

A group of investors asked Silvergate users who deposited fiat “into an FTX- or Alameda-related account” from 2019 to 2022 to submit claims for a settlement filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of California.

According to the lawsuit, investors have until Jan. 30 to opt out or file a claim as part of a $10 million settlement that “resolves a lawsuit over whether Silvergate Bank, Silvergate Capital Corporation, and Alan J. Lane aided and abetted tortious conduct on the part of FTX, Alameda, and Sam Bankman-Fried.”

“The Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate […],” said a Dec. 8 court filing asking for approval. “It marks a significant recovery from the bankrupt Silvergate and will provide additional relief, beyond that obtained in the FTX Bankruptcy, for those affected by the multi-billion-dollar collapse of the FTX cryptocurrency exchange.”

Source: FTXbanksettlement.com

Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro scheduled a final hearing to consider the settlement on Feb. 9, giving any investors tied to FTX and Alameda more than a month to file claims. According to court filings, the FTX bankruptcy case has reached more than 46,000 potential claimants by mail, which could result in proportional payments from the $10 million settlement. 

Related: Judge greenlights class suit alleging Silvergate Bank aided FTX fraud

Silvergate was one of the few crypto-friendly banks in the US that had ties to the FTX exchange at the time of its collapse in November 2022. The bank voluntarily wound down operations in March 2023.

Ongoing saga of FTX criminal charges

Although many of the criminal cases involving former FTX and Alameda executives have concluded in the last three years, there are still some civil matters in courts and one potential prosecution of an individual tied to the exchange.

Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried, former Alameda Research CEO Caroline Ellison and former FTX Digital Markets co-CEO Ryan Salame are serving time in federal prison for their roles in the collapse. Two other FTX executives, Nishad Singh and Gary Wang, were given time served.

Michelle Bond, Salame’s wife, faces campaign finance charges related to FTX funds in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. Her legal team alleged that prosecutors induced a guilty plea from Salame on the promise that they would not pursue a case against Bond. The next evidentiary hearing for Bond’s case is scheduled for March 4.

Magazine: When privacy and AML laws conflict: Crypto projects’ impossible choice

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/silvergate-bank-lawsuit-ftx-alameda-settlement?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Market Opportunity
Lorenzo Protocol Logo
Lorenzo Protocol Price(BANK)
$0.03611
$0.03611$0.03611
+0.30%
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

IN PROTEST. Supporters of the Liberty and Refoundation party protest in front of the presidential palace in support of Honduran President Xiomara Castro in what
Share
Rappler2025/12/19 20:00
UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

After crossing paths in UST for the first time in UAAP Season 86, Kent Pastrana and Eka Soriano leave the Growling Tigresses' lair as two-time champions, reigniting
Share
Rappler2025/12/19 20:21