The post Why Are Altcoins Stuck and Will 2026 Be Any Different? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin dominance near 59% left most altcoins rangebound inThe post Why Are Altcoins Stuck and Will 2026 Be Any Different? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin dominance near 59% left most altcoins rangebound in

Why Are Altcoins Stuck and Will 2026 Be Any Different?

  • Bitcoin dominance near 59% left most altcoins rangebound in December.
  • Analysts watched reserves and Treasury cash flows for a liquidity turn.
  • Federal Reserve QT ended December 1, but risk appetite stayed selective.

Altcoins stayed rangebound as Bitcoin dominance climbed toward 59% and liquidity stayed tight. Analysts tied the drift to liquidity, not headlines, with Bitcoin absorbing most fresh demand.

Interestingly, analysts claim that this stagnation is not driven by sentiment or weak projects, but by a lack of liquidity across the broader crypto market.

Market data and historical patterns indicate that this phase is not unusual but is a familiar part of the crypto cycle where Bitcoin leads and altcoins wait for conditions to change.

Related: Should You Buy the Dip? Analyzing the Crypto Market Crash After Fed’s 25 bps Cut

Liquidity, Not Sentiment, Is Holding Altcoins Back

Crypto trader VirtualBacon said the main reason altcoins have not moved is simple, there is no excess liquidity. When liquidity is flat, Bitcoin dominance tends to rise while altcoins stay stuck.

This does not signal weakness in the market, but rather a phase where capital remains concentrated in Bitcoin.

Historically, major altcoin rallies have followed the same sequence. Bitcoin breaks out first, then enters a period of consolidation. Only after liquidity expands do altcoins begin to outperform.

Rotating into altcoins too early often leads to slow losses, while rotating too late risks missing the strongest part of the move.

VirtualBacon pointed out clear signals that usually mark the shift, including rising bank reserves, drawdowns in the US Treasury General Account, and accelerating ETF inflows. None of these signals have yet shown up.

What the Fed’s QT Cycle Say About Altcoins

Another analyst, Matthew Hyland, explained the long-term relationship between altcoins and Bitcoin dominance during periods of quantitative tightening, known as QT.

He shared a chart comparing altcoin dominance against Bitcoin dominance over more than a decade, segmented by times when QT was active or inactive.

The data shows that when QT is active, liquidity tightens and Bitcoin dominance tends to rise. During these phases, altcoins usually underperform and remain capped.

On the other hand, when QT is inactive and liquidity conditions improve, altcoin dominance has historically increased for extended periods, often lasting several years.

The chart also shows that each major altcoin cycle began only after QT pressure eased.

Altcoins Are Weak, but Support Is Holding

Meanwhile, Altcoin Vector said that the current market is defined by indecision. Bitcoin has not fully reclaimed leadership, while altcoins remain reactive and unable to break out of established ranges.

However, altcoins continue to hold a multi-month support level against Bitcoin that has been forming for roughly six months. Each pullback has found buyers at similar levels.

According to analysts, this structure means that altcoins do not need a major shift to move higher. A single catalyst tied to liquidity could be enough to restart momentum.

Related: Bitcoin and Altcoins Enter High-Risk Week as Delayed US Jobs Data Meets BoJ Hike Fears

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/altseason-canceled-no-liquidity-means-pain-for-bag-holders-until-2026/

Market Opportunity
WHY Logo
WHY Price(WHY)
$0.00000001529
$0.00000001529$0.00000001529
0.00%
USD
WHY (WHY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Singapore Entrepreneur Loses Entire Crypto Portfolio After Downloading Fake Game

Singapore Entrepreneur Loses Entire Crypto Portfolio After Downloading Fake Game

The post Singapore Entrepreneur Loses Entire Crypto Portfolio After Downloading Fake Game appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief A Singapore-based man has
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/18 05:17
‘Rich Dad Poor Dad’ Author Kiyosaki Breaks Silence on Fed Rate Cut With Bitcoin Call

‘Rich Dad Poor Dad’ Author Kiyosaki Breaks Silence on Fed Rate Cut With Bitcoin Call

The post ‘Rich Dad Poor Dad’ Author Kiyosaki Breaks Silence on Fed Rate Cut With Bitcoin Call appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Robert Kiyosaki is back doing
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/18 05:25