The post Vitalik Buterin Calls for ‘New Designs’ of DAOs appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has called for new decentralizedThe post Vitalik Buterin Calls for ‘New Designs’ of DAOs appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has called for new decentralized

Vitalik Buterin Calls for ‘New Designs’ of DAOs

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has called for new decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) designs, arguing that the sector needs more than token-voting treasuries if it wants to improve on traditional corporate and political structures. 

In a Monday X post, Buterin said that current DAOs often amount to “a treasury controlled by token holder voting.”

That model is widely copied but it is “inefficient, vulnerable to capture and fails utterly at the goal of mitigating the weaknesses of human politics,” he said.

Buterin argued that DAOs should solve specific infrastructure problems, starting with better oracles, onchain dispute resolution and long‑term project stewardship.

He also highlighted the need for DAOs for subjective disputes (such as insurance outcomes), maintain shared lists like anti‑scam registries and standard formats to spin up short‑lived funding vehicles and keep projects alive after core teams disappear.

Vitalik Buterin calls for new designs of DAOs. Source: Vitalik Buterin

Related: Vitalik calls for a ‘garbage collection’ function to stop Ethereum bloat

Concave vs. convex: different DAOs for different problems

​Buterin framed his thinking using his earlier “convex vs concave” governance lens. For “concave” problems, where compromise is “better than a coin flip,” DAOs should maximize robustness by aggregating input from many sources.

For “convex” problems that require decisive bets, he said it was more appropriate to allow strong leadership and treat decentralization to hold leaders to account, rather than a full replacement.

​To make such systems work in practice, DAOs must solve privacy issues and “decision fatigue,” Buterin said.

Without privacy, governance becomes a “social game,” and if participants are asked to vote constantly, engagement falls off after an initial burst of enthusiasm. He pointed to zero‑knowledge proofs and, in some cases, secure multi‑party computation and fully homomorphic encryption to secure privacy.

He also suggested that artificial intelligence could help reduce decision fatigue by supporting analysis or allowing users to delegate voting to locally controlled models, while cautioning against DAOs being run by AI.

Related: Why Ethereum’s ‘walkaway test’ and quantum readiness matter more than ever

Low turnout, whale capture and the case for next‑gen DAOs 

Buterin’s post comes as DAO ecosystems are growing but struggle with participation and concentration. 

DAO tokens have a market capitalization of at least $17.5 billion, according to CoinMarketCap.

While mature DAOs like Aave DAO and the Optimism Collective have used onchain governance to manage major decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols and fund public goods, Buterin argued that projects designing new oracles or governance systems should treat DAO design and the surrounding communication layer as “50% of their job, not 10%,” if they want Ethereum’s decentralized base layer to carry through to the apps built on top.

Magazine: Ethereum’s Fusaka fork explained for dummies — What the hell is PeerDAS?

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently. Read our Editorial Policy https://cointelegraph.com/editorial-policy

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-calls-new-design-daos?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Market Opportunity
ZeroLend Logo
ZeroLend Price(ZERO)
$0.000006972
$0.000006972$0.000006972
-4.42%
USD
ZeroLend (ZERO) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Ethereum Price Closer to $4,000 Breakout as ETH Whales go on Buying Spree

Ethereum Price Closer to $4,000 Breakout as ETH Whales go on Buying Spree

The post Ethereum Price Closer to $4,000 Breakout as ETH Whales go on Buying Spree appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insights: Large ETH wallets are buying
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/20 10:16
New Zealand Dollar weakens below 0.5800 despite Trump’s tariff threats

New Zealand Dollar weakens below 0.5800 despite Trump’s tariff threats

The post New Zealand Dollar weakens below 0.5800 despite Trump’s tariff threats appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The NZD/USD pair loses ground to around 0.5790
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/20 10:10