The post TON: Rise or Fall? 15 January 2026 Scenario Analysis appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TON is standing at a critical crossroads at the $1.75 level. The post TON: Rise or Fall? 15 January 2026 Scenario Analysis appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TON is standing at a critical crossroads at the $1.75 level.

TON: Rise or Fall? 15 January 2026 Scenario Analysis

TON is standing at a critical crossroads at the $1.75 level. Although the short-term downtrend dominates, the RSI being in the neutral zone (44.46) and balanced support/resistance levels across multiple timeframes (MTF) make both bullish and bearish scenarios possible. The daily 1.97% loss and narrow range ($1.73-$1.81) may signal a volatility breakout. Traders should be prepared for both directions and monitor trigger levels.

Current Market Situation

TON is currently trading at the $1.75 level and recorded a $84.83M volume with a 1.97% drop over the last 24 hours. The price range is stuck between $1.73-$1.81, reflecting a consolidation phase. The overall trend is downward: Price is below EMA20 ($1.76), MACD histogram is negative and giving a bearish signal, and Supertrend is in bearish mode pointing to $1.84 resistance.

RSI at 44.46 is in the neutral zone, no oversold conditions but momentum is weak. MTF analysis shows 13 strong levels: 1D (4 supports/2 resistances), 3D (1 support/2 resistances), 1W (3 supports/4 resistances). This distribution indicates that resistance weight in higher timeframes supports the downside, but short-term supports offer recovery potential. Key supports: $1.7313 (67/100), $1.6850 (62/100). Resistances: $1.7463 (86/100), $1.8026 (72/100), $1.9500 (66/100). News flow is calm, so technical levels will be decisive. Current R/R ratio is balanced (~1:1.1) based on bull target $1.9500 (+11.4%) and bear target $1.5334 (-12.6%).

Scenario 1: Bullish Scenario

How Does This Scenario Occur?

For the bullish scenario, a strong volume breakout above the $1.7463 resistance (86/100 score) is required first. This level overlaps with short-term EMA20 ($1.76), and a breakout could trigger the MACD histogram to approach the zero line. Momentum then builds toward $1.8026; RSI should rise above 50 and Supertrend should turn bullish. On the 1D timeframe, 4 strong supports (e.g., $1.7313) can hold during pullbacks. Despite 4 resistances on 1W in MTF, they can be overcome with positive catalysts in overall market sentiment (e.g., BTC recovery). Volume increase and candle closes (e.g., bullish engulfing) are confirmation requirements. Invalidation criterion: Loss of $1.7313 support invalidates the scenario and turns it bearish.

Target Levels

First target $1.8026 (72/100), followed by $1.9500 (66/100, 11.4% upside). In more aggressive moves, 1W targets above $2.10 can be tested, but Fibonacci extensions and MTF resistances should be monitored. For protection, a stop-loss below entry at $1.7313 is recommended (for educational purposes). This scenario could trigger short squeezes and momentum buying, providing traders with detailed chart tracking on the TON Spot Analysis page.

Scenario 2: Bearish Scenario

Risk Factors

The bearish scenario is triggered by a volume breakout below the $1.7313 support (67/100 score). This level aligns with the 24h low ($1.73), and a breakout accelerates distance from EMA20. MACD negative histogram expands, RSI drops below 40, and Supertrend strengthens its bearish signal. In MTF, 4 resistances on 1W and 2 on 3D can limit upside moves. Volume increase (especially selling pressure) and bearish candle patterns (e.g., shooting star) provide confirmation. Risk factors include general crypto weakness or liquidity withdrawal. Invalidation criterion: Break above $1.7463 resistance invalidates the scenario and shifts to bullish.

Protection Levels

First protection $1.6850 (62/100), followed by $1.5334 target (12.6% downside). In deeper drops, 1D supports can extend to $1.50, measured with Fibonacci retracements. Wait for $1.7313 breakout for entry, stop-loss above $1.7463. This scenario offers risk management tools on the TON Futures Analysis page for leveraged positions.

Which Scenario to Watch?

Main triggers: For bullish, close above $1.7463 + volume increase + RSI>50. For bearish, close below $1.7313 + no MACD divergence + selling dominance in volume. Confirmation signals: Candle patterns, EMA crosses, and MTF alignment. In both scenarios, the $1.73-$1.75 pivot zone is critical; reaction here determines direction. With low volatility (narrow range), filter breakouts by volume. Traders should manage risks using each scenario’s invalidation (bullish: below $1.7313; bearish: above $1.7463).

Conclusion and Monitoring Notes

Both scenarios for TON are equally likely; while the current downtrend favors bears, support scores offer recovery chances. Monitoring points: 1. $1.7463 resistance test (bull confirmation). 2. $1.7313 support test (bear confirmation). 3. Volume and RSI changes. 4. BTC correlation (positive supports bulls). Prioritize daily closes and MTF levels. This analysis is designed to help traders make their own decisions; markets are dynamic, update continuously. Check relevant pages for spot and futures.

Trading Analyst: Emily Watson

Short-term trading strategies expert

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/ton-rise-or-fall-15-january-2026-scenario-analysis

Market Opportunity
4 Logo
4 Price(4)
$0.02535
$0.02535$0.02535
-5.26%
USD
4 (4) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

X to cut off InfoFi crypto projects from accessing its API

X to cut off InfoFi crypto projects from accessing its API

X, the most widely used app for crypto projects, is changing its API access policy. InfoFi projects, which proliferated non-organic bot content, will be cut off
Share
Cryptopolitan2026/01/16 02:50
X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash

X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash

The post X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X has revoked API access for apps that reward users for
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 03:42
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00