Wisconsin Targets Crypto Firms in Sports Betting Clash

• Wisconsin challenges crypto firms, arguing that event contracts function as unlicensed sports betting.
• Firms defend event contracts as federally regulated derivatives, setting up a major legal showdown.
• Rising state crackdowns on prediction markets increase pressure despite mixed federal regulatory signals.

Wisconsin has escalated a high-stakes legal fight against major crypto and trading platforms over sports event contracts. The state filed complaints in Dane County targeting Kalshi, Coinbase, Polymarket, Robinhood, and Crypto.com. 

Officials argue the firms offer unlicensed gambling products disguised as financial instruments. The lawsuits aim to resolve whether these contracts fall under federal derivatives law or state betting rules.

Attorney General Josh Kaul underscored the state’s position. He said, “Thinly disguising unlawful conduct doesn’t make it lawful.” 

Regulators claim users risk money on real-world outcomes for fixed returns. Hence, they classify the structure as traditional wagering. As a result, Wisconsin rejects the companies’ argument that federal oversight through derivatives law applies.

Legal Battle Over Definitions

However, the companies strongly reject Wisconsin’s claims and anchor their defense in federal law. They argue that event contracts qualify as derivatives under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Kalshi maintains it operates under nationwide regulatory oversight. 

Meanwhile, Robinhood and Coinbase back that position and route trades through Kalshi’s exchange.

Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal also pushed back against the lawsuit. He said, “Wisconsin’s lawsuit today against Coinbase and others − ‘is exactly the patchwork that Congress replaced wholecloth by creating the CFTC.’” 

He added that Congress intended a unified national framework. As a result, the firms warn that state-level enforcement could fracture the market.

Rising State Pressure and Industry Risks

Meanwhile, state enforcement has intensified across the U.S., adding pressure on prediction market platforms. Nevada blocked Kalshi’s sports contracts earlier this month, while Arizona advanced similar actions. Tennessee regulators also issued cease-and-desist orders, directing firms to halt contracts and refund users.

However, federal signals remain mixed, which adds to regulatory uncertainty. Some agencies back classifying event contracts as derivatives under federal law. At the same time, courts have begun to define the limits of state authority. Kalshi recently secured an appellate ruling that narrowed how states can enforce gambling laws.

As a result, there is increased friction amid market expansion. Robinhood and Coinbase have extended their reach by collaborating with Kalshi, directing transactions to their platform. 

They are now processing billions of dollars’ worth of transactions. In addition, individuals can place bets on sporting events, politics, and economics, raising the interest of regulatory authorities.

Related: U.S. Soldier Accused of Using Classified Intel to Win $400K on Polymarket