Sui says AI agents need shared verifiable state and atomic workflows to avoid partially conflicting actions across services. Sui positions on-chain execution asSui says AI agents need shared verifiable state and atomic workflows to avoid partially conflicting actions across services. Sui positions on-chain execution as

Sui Positions Itself as the Blockchain for Autonomous AI Agents

  • Sui says AI agents need shared verifiable state and atomic workflows to avoid partially conflicting actions across services.
  • Sui positions on-chain execution as provable with permissions that travel with data and final auditable state changes.

Sui Foundation says AI is moving from generating recommendations to completing tasks, a shift it describes as “agentic” execution. In a January post, the foundation argues that once software can book services, allocate resources, or trigger transactions, trust depends on provable outcomes rather than readable outputs.

The network frames the current internet as optimized for human control, with features such as session expirations, manual retries, and dashboards that assume a person will resolve errors. It adds that the state is often fragmented across separate services, making it hard to confirm what happened without interpreting logs. In this view, autonomous agents operating at machine speed can turn partial failures into costly inconsistencies.

Sui’s message is that autonomous execution needs shared truth and enforceable constraints across systems that do not share a single operator. Sui blockchain is an execution environment designed to coordinate multi-step actions and settle them into a single, verifiable result.

In other news, CNF noted that the Sui network is targeting 2026 to introduce protocol-level confidential on-chain payments with controlled audit access for compliance needs. Under the plan, only the sender and recipient would see details such as amounts and addresses, while enabling authorized audits when required.

Sui’s Execution Layer is Built for Agentic Workflows

SUI Foundation outlined four capabilities it considers necessary for autonomous agents. These included shared and verifiable state, permissions that travel with data, atomic execution for workflows, and proof of what occurred. It describes these as requirements for agents that must coordinate across apps and organizations without relying on human cleanup or post-hoc reconciliation.

On Sui, actions can be structured so that data, authority, and history remain tied to what an agent is allowed to change. It also describes a workflow model where multi-step tasks can execute as a unit, completing fully or failing cleanly, to avoid partially committed states. 

For verification, the foundation says the network’s final state change is auditable, showing what happened and under which authority, without requiring log reconstruction. This approach aligns with Sui’s AI positioning, including its published material on building “trusted, verifiable AI systems” using modular components for storage, access control, and verifiable compute.

Moreover, Sui Group plans to launch the yield-earning stablecoin SuiUSDE next month and direct 90% of its fees toward SUI buybacks or DeFi projects on Sui. As we reported, the token will use white-labeled Ethena technology while staying off Ethereum, and it follows the Sui Foundation’s launch of native stablecoin USDsui.

At the time of writing, SUI traded at about $1.21, down 5.57% over the past 24 hours.

]]>
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
This is How Dogecoin Holders Responded After the Market Crash

This is How Dogecoin Holders Responded After the Market Crash

The post This is How Dogecoin Holders Responded After the Market Crash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Dogecoin price dropped sharply over the past several
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/02 03:58
Shiba Inu Price Prediction: How High Can SHIB Go by the End of 2026?

Shiba Inu Price Prediction: How High Can SHIB Go by the End of 2026?

Shiba Inu is back in the conversation, and the talk isn’t all about the recent price action. After the broader market took a hit, the SHIB price slid from around
Share
Captainaltcoin2026/02/02 04:30