The post Terraform Labs estate files $4B lawsuit against Jump Trading appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A new lawsuit has reopened scrutiny around the collapseThe post Terraform Labs estate files $4B lawsuit against Jump Trading appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A new lawsuit has reopened scrutiny around the collapse

Terraform Labs estate files $4B lawsuit against Jump Trading

A new lawsuit has reopened scrutiny around the collapse of one of crypto’s most damaging failures.

Summary

  • Terraform Labs’ bankruptcy estate is seeking $4B in damages from Jump Trading.
  • The lawsuit alleges undisclosed deals tied to TerraUSD and LUNA’s stability.
  • The case could expose new details about Terra’s collapse through discovery.

The legal fallout from the Terra collapse widened again this week.

The Wall Street Journal reported on Dec. 18 that the court-appointed administrator overseeing Terraform Labs’ bankruptcy has filed a $4 billion lawsuit against Jump Trading and two of its senior figures in U.S. federal court.

Claims tied to Terra’s rise and collapse

The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois by Todd Snyder, the plan administrator tasked with winding down Terraform Labs. It names Jump Trading LLC, co-founder William DiSomma, and former Jump Crypto president Kanav Kariya as defendants.

The complaint claims that before the Terra ecosystem’s collapse in May 2022, Jump was crucial in both sustaining and benefiting from it. According to the filing, Jump allegedly entered into secret agreements with Do Kwon, the founder of Terraform, as early as 2019, enabling the company to purchase significant quantities of LUNA at steep discounts while publicly portraying itself as a neutral market player.

Jump discreetly intervened to reinstate the stablecoin’s dollar peg during a TerraUSD depeg in May 2021 by buying significant amounts of tokens. But in public, Terra’s algorithmic design was credited with the recovery. This deception strengthened trust in the system while assisting Terraform in avoiding regulatory scrutiny.

The lawsuit further alleges that Jump later secured the removal of vesting restrictions on its LUNA holdings, enabling rapid sales at significantly higher prices. Those transactions are described as generating profits approaching $1 billion.

During Terra’s final collapse in May 2022, the complaint says nearly 50,000 bitcoin were transferred from the Luna Foundation Guard to Jump without a formal agreement, adding to claims of self-dealing.

Snyder’s filing characterizes Jump’s conduct as manipulation and concealment that enriched the firm while accelerating losses for investors. The Terra ecosystem’s collapse erased an estimated $40 billion in market value and triggered a broader chain reaction across the crypto market.

Jump Trading has not publicly responded to the lawsuit. DiSomma and Kariya have previously invoked their Fifth Amendment rights in related investigations, and Kariya left Jump last year.

The case adds to a growing list of legal actions tied to Terra. In December 2024, a Jump subsidiary agreed to pay $123 million to settle SEC charges related to misleading statements about TerraUSD’s stability.

Terraform Labs itself reached a roughly $4.5 billion settlement with U.S. regulators, largely addressed through bankruptcy proceedings, while Do Kwon was recently sentenced to 15 years on fraud charges.

If the case moves forward, discovery could surface internal communications and trading records that reshape how Terra’s collapse, and the role of major trading firms, is understood.

Source: https://crypto.news/terraform-labs-estate-4b-jump-trading-lawsuit-2025/

Market Opportunity
Jump Tom Logo
Jump Tom Price(JUMP)
$0.000000000000000000000001
$0.000000000000000000000001$0.000000000000000000000001
-85.71%
USD
Jump Tom (JUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

IN PROTEST. Supporters of the Liberty and Refoundation party protest in front of the presidential palace in support of Honduran President Xiomara Castro in what
Share
Rappler2025/12/19 20:00
UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

After crossing paths in UST for the first time in UAAP Season 86, Kent Pastrana and Eka Soriano leave the Growling Tigresses' lair as two-time champions, reigniting
Share
Rappler2025/12/19 20:21