The post Jump Trading sued for $4 billion over Terraform Labs fallout: Report appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Todd Snyder, who manages the liquidationThe post Jump Trading sued for $4 billion over Terraform Labs fallout: Report appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Todd Snyder, who manages the liquidation

Jump Trading sued for $4 billion over Terraform Labs fallout: Report

Key Takeaways

  • Todd Snyder, who manages the liquidation of the Terra ecosystem, is suing Jump Trading for $4 billion.
  • The crash of TerraUSD and LUNA tokens led to significant investor losses and cascading failures in the crypto sector.

The administrator of Terraform Labs’ bankruptcy, Todd Snyder, has filed a lawsuit against Jump Trading, its executives William DiSomma and Kanav Kariya, accusing them of profiting unlawfully and contributing to the crash of Terraform in 2022, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Jump Trading faced scrutiny for its role in the TerraUSD and FTX crises. The TerraUSD/LUNA collapse led to massive losses for investors and a subsequent downturn in the crypto sector.

The administrator is seeking $4 billion in damages, alleging that Jump had a secret deal that affected TerraUSD’s stability.

After heavy losses and downsizing, Jump Trading still operates digital asset trading and market-making worldwide.

The crypto giant is enhancing its US crypto operations by revitalizing its digital asset desk and accelerating hiring for roles such as crypto engineers and policy liaison positions.

Jump Crypto, together with Galaxy Digital and Multicoin Capital, is backing Forward Industries, the largest Solana treasury entity.

Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/terraform-labs-lawsuit-jump-trading/

Market Opportunity
Jump Tom Logo
Jump Tom Price(JUMP)
$0.000000000000000000000001
$0.000000000000000000000001$0.000000000000000000000001
-85.71%
USD
Jump Tom (JUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

IN PROTEST. Supporters of the Liberty and Refoundation party protest in front of the presidential palace in support of Honduran President Xiomara Castro in what
Share
Rappler2025/12/19 20:00
UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

After crossing paths in UST for the first time in UAAP Season 86, Kent Pastrana and Eka Soriano leave the Growling Tigresses' lair as two-time champions, reigniting
Share
Rappler2025/12/19 20:21