Where does the US crypto regulation bill stand in 2026? Track the real-time Senate progress of the CLARITY Act — FIT21's successor — and what its passage (or failure) means for crypto markets worldwide.
Key Takeaways
FIT21 (Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act) passed the US House in May 2024 with a 279–136 bipartisan vote, establishing the first comprehensive regulatory blueprint for digital assets
Its successor, the CLARITY Act, passed the House in July 2025 with an even stronger 294–134 vote, reflecting growing congressional consensus
As of May 2026, the CLARITY Act has not received a single formal Senate committee vote and is racing against the legislative calendar
Senator Bernie Moreno has set an end-of-May deadline, warning the bill risks being shelved indefinitely if Congress misses this window
Galaxy Digital estimates odds of the CLARITY Act being signed into law in 2026 at roughly 50-50, or possibly lower
A key stablecoin yield compromise was reached in early May 2026, removing the biggest single obstacle to a Senate Banking Committee markup
From FIT21 to the CLARITY Act: A Two-Year Legislative Timeline
To understand where things stand today, the timeline matters.
On May 22, 2024, the US House of Representatives passed
FIT21 with a 279–136 vote — 208 Republicans and 71 Democrats in favor. It was the first time Congress had passed comprehensive crypto market structure legislation with meaningful bipartisan support. The bill proposed a clear division of regulatory authority between the SEC and CFTC: digital assets on blockchains deemed "functional" and "decentralized" would fall under CFTC jurisdiction as "digital commodities," while those on functional but not sufficiently decentralized networks would remain under SEC oversight as "restricted digital assets."
However, as
DL News reported at the time, analysts were quick to note that Senate passage was far less certain. There was no companion bill in the Senate, and the chamber included prominent critics such as Senator Elizabeth Warren.
The political landscape shifted dramatically after the 2024 elections. With President Trump explicitly targeting the US becoming "the crypto capital of the planet" — appointing David Sacks as crypto and AI czar, nominating pro-crypto regulators to lead both the SEC and CFTC, and signing executive orders on digital asset policy — the legislative environment became markedly more favorable.
In May 2025, Representative French Hill introduced the
CLARITY Act, which built on FIT21's framework with more detailed provisions. It passed the full House in July 2025 with 294 votes — surpassing FIT21's totals on both sides of the aisle, with 216 Republicans and 78 Democrats in support.
The Senate Bottleneck: What Has (and Hasn't) Happened
The House votes are the easy part. The Senate has proven far more complicated.
According to
Latham & Watkins' US Crypto Policy Tracker, the path the CLARITY Act must travel through the Senate involves multiple sequential hurdles: the Senate Banking Committee must hold a markup and vote; the Senate Agriculture Committee, which oversees the CFTC, must do the same; the two committee versions must be reconciled into a single text; that text must pass the full Senate by at least 60 votes to clear the cloture threshold; and then it must be reconciled with the House-passed version before going to the President.
As of early 2026, the Agriculture Committee had already advanced its version — the Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act — on January 29, 2026. The Senate Banking Committee, however, had not completed a markup. Multiple draft versions were circulated: a 182-page discussion draft in September 2025, and a 278-page draft on January 12, 2026.
The core sticking point has been the stablecoin yield provision. Traditional banks — led by the American Bankers Association and the Bank Policy Institute — have lobbied aggressively against any rule that would allow crypto firms to offer interest or yield on stablecoin balances, arguing it creates unfair competition with bank deposits.
CNBC reported that banking groups have made direct calls to senators in an effort to slow or water down the bill.
May 2026: A Breakthrough Compromise — and a Narrowing Window
The situation shifted materially in the first week of May.
On May 2, 2026, Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks released
compromise text on the stablecoin yield question. The agreement bars crypto firms from paying yield on stablecoin holdings if such yield is functionally or economically equivalent to bank deposits — but explicitly permits rewards tied to genuine user activity, such as using or spending stablecoins. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong immediately called on the committee to "mark it up." Circle's chief strategy officer endorsed the deal without qualification. Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott said the panel is working toward a bipartisan markup in May.
Disruption Banking noted that the announcement immediately lifted crypto markets — Bitcoin briefly topped $80,000 as investors priced in faster regulatory clarity.
Yet the legislative calendar remains unforgiving.
CoinDesk's analysis laid out the math: even after a Banking Committee markup, the bill needs a full Senate floor vote (requiring 60 votes for cloture), reconciliation with the Agriculture Committee version, reconciliation with the House text, and Trump's signature. The Senate breaks in August for recess and enters election mode ahead of November's midterms, leaving roughly 9 to 10 working weeks of actual floor time before the window effectively closes.
Galaxy Digital's Alex Thorn wrote in an
April research note that the odds of the CLARITY Act being signed into law in 2026 stand at "roughly 50-50, and possibly lower," adding: "The uncertainty stems not from any single issue but from the sheer number of unresolved questions that must be settled in sequence under severe time pressure." On prediction market Polymarket, passage odds stood at around 47% in late April — down sharply from 82% in February.
Senator Moreno's warning was unambiguous: miss the end-of-May window, and the bill faces being shelved indefinitely.
What the Bill Would Actually Change
If the CLARITY Act is signed into law, the implications for the crypto industry would be structural, not cosmetic.
Regulatory clarity on asset classification. The binary question — is a given token a security or a commodity? — would be answered by statute rather than by SEC enforcement actions and court rulings. This is perhaps the single most consequential change for the industry.
CFTC gains expanded authority. The CFTC would receive exclusive jurisdiction over spot market digital commodities, a major expansion of its current role. New registration frameworks for digital commodity exchanges, brokers, and dealers would be established under CFTC oversight.
DeFi gets legal breathing room. The bill explicitly carves out users and operators of genuinely decentralized finance networks from most registration requirements, offering meaningful protection for permissionless protocols.
Institutional capital unlocked. CoinDesk cited the GENIUS Act's stablecoin framework as a proof of concept: following its passage, the stablecoin market grew 49% to $306 billion in 2025, Circle and Ripple received provisional national banking charters from the OCC, and institutional capital that had been on the sidelines moved in. The pattern is expected to repeat — at greater scale — if comprehensive market structure rules are established.
Compliance costs rise for intermediaries. Exchanges, brokers, and custodians operating in the US market will face new registration, disclosure, and AML obligations. This is a real cost but one the industry has broadly accepted as the price of regulatory legitimacy.
Who's For It, Who's Against It — and Why It Matters to Global Markets
The CLARITY Act enjoys strong support from major crypto firms including Coinbase, Circle, Kraken, and a16z, as well as industry associations including the Blockchain Association and the Crypto Council for Innovation. The Trump administration has been explicitly supportive.
Opposition comes primarily from the traditional banking lobby, which views stablecoin yield provisions as an existential threat to deposit-taking franchises, and from a subset of Senate Democrats who have raised concerns about financial stability, market integrity, and ethics — the latter largely a reference to the Trump family's multiple crypto ventures, which have generated billions in personal wealth.
The ethics clause — designed to restrict senior government officials from profiting from crypto interests during their tenure — remains a live negotiating point. Democrats are pushing for it to be included; it is not currently in the Banking Committee's version.
For crypto investors outside the United States, this legislation matters regardless of where they trade. A regulated, institutionally accessible US crypto market would represent a fundamental shift in capital flows, liquidity, and global market structure. Traders on
MEXC can track the real-time market impact of each legislative development across thousands of trading pairs.
Key Dates to Watch
Late May 2026: Senate Banking Committee markup — the critical near-term milestone
By July 2026: The window Galaxy Research considers necessary for a viable path to passage
August 2026: Senate recess begins; any bill not moving by then faces severe headwinds
November 2026: Midterm elections — a change in chamber control would reset the legislative landscape
Late 2026: The "lame duck" session offers a theoretical last-ditch opportunity, but with low probability
FAQ
Is FIT21 still relevant, or has it been replaced by the CLARITY Act?
FIT21 is the legislative ancestor of the CLARITY Act. It passed the House in May 2024 but never advanced in the Senate. The CLARITY Act is the current, active legislative vehicle — it incorporates FIT21's core framework but with significantly expanded provisions on DeFi, stablecoin rules, disclosure standards, and registration frameworks. When policymakers and analysts refer to pending crypto market structure legislation in 2026, they mean the CLARITY Act.
What is the SEC/CFTC jurisdictional split under the CLARITY Act?
The bill grants the CFTC exclusive authority over spot markets for "digital commodities" — tokens on blockchains that are both functional and sufficiently decentralized. The SEC retains authority over "investment contract assets," meaning tokens on networks that are functional but not yet decentralized. This framework resolves the central ambiguity that has defined years of US crypto regulatory uncertainty.
What happens if the CLARITY Act fails to pass in 2026?
Industry insiders warn the next realistic legislative window may not arrive until 2028 or beyond. In the interim, the US crypto industry would continue operating under SEC and CFTC enforcement-driven frameworks, while jurisdictions including the EU, Singapore, and the UAE — which have already enacted digital asset market structure rules — would continue gaining ground as destinations for crypto development and institutional engagement.
How does the GENIUS Act differ from the CLARITY Act?
The GENIUS Act, passed in 2025, addresses payment stablecoins specifically — reserve requirements, redemption rights, and issuance rules. It was the narrower, more politically tractable piece of the legislative agenda. The CLARITY Act covers the entire remaining landscape: exchanges, brokers, custodians, token classification, SEC/CFTC jurisdiction, and DeFi treatment. Together, they are designed to function as complementary pillars of a comprehensive US digital asset regulatory framework.
Can crypto traders outside the US be affected by this legislation?
Yes, in several indirect but meaningful ways. US regulatory clarity historically drives institutional capital into crypto markets, increasing global liquidity and reducing volatility. Conversely, continued uncertainty keeps a large portion of institutional capital on the sidelines. Changes in US market structure also affect how global exchanges set compliance standards and how token issuers structure offerings. Any trader tracking macro-level crypto market conditions has a direct interest in following the CLARITY Act's progress.
Disclaimer
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, legal counsel, or any form of financial recommendation. Cryptocurrency investments involve significant risk, including the potential loss of the entire principal invested. The legislative developments described in this article are based on publicly available information and are subject to change. This content does not represent the official position of any government agency or regulatory body. Always conduct your own independent research and consult a qualified professional before making any investment decision.
About the Author
This article was written by the
MEXC Crypto Pulse Team — the research and content division of
MEXC, dedicated to delivering accurate, timely, and in-depth analysis of crypto market developments, regulatory trends, and macroeconomic signals for a global audience. Last updated May 2026.
Sources